View clinical trials related to Peri-implant Mucositis.
Filter by:Repeated removal and re-placement of healing and prosthetic abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues. The purpose was to evaluate the effect of repeated removal and re-placement of laser microgrooved and smooth/machined healing and prosthetic abutments during restorative stages, and 1 year after functional loading, on proinflammatory cytokine levels around dental implants.
Due to the limited efficacy of its treatment modalities, there is a stringent need to improve the prevention and early diagnosis of peri-implantitis. In fact, to date clinical and radiographic tools are not able to discern which patients are going to develop peri-implantitis and, among the ones already with peri-implantitis, which ones are currently loosing bone and which ones are going to progress. This project aims to analyze for the first time the whole large scale proteome and metabolome of peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) with an integrated approach from implants with peri-implant diseases. Twenty-five patients with at least one implant with peri-implant mucositis and one implant with peri-implantitis will be selected. For each of the selected participants, the PICF from an implant with peri-implant mucositis and from an implant with peri-implantitis will be sampled two different times before treatment. One year after the corresponding treatment is provided, the PICF of the treated implants with peri-implantitis will be sampled again. Both proteomic and metabolomic profiling of the samples will be carried out. The most important strength of this project will be the ability to evaluate together the whole proteome and the whole metabolome and to integrate them in the same framework.
The objective of this study was to perform the first clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of propolis extract, nanovitamin C and nanovitamin E gel as adjuvant to mechanical debridement in clinical and microbiological parameters of implants with peri-implant mucositis
This double arm, split-mouth, single centre, controlled, randomised clinical study is designed to examine the effect of implantoplasty in treatment of peri-implantitis. Peri-implantitis will be treated with open flap debridement, with or without implantoplasty.
The present study aimed to increase the thickness of the gingiva and prevent possible crestal bone resorption by placing the CTG or T-PRF membrane under the mucosa immediately after the implant treatment in individuals with thin gingival phenotype. The null hypothesis was that T-PRF used simultaneously with implant placement can be considered an alternative to CTG.
The aim of this study is to determine the relative abundances of the different bacterial phyla and families in the microbiota present on the surface of PEEK implant-supported provisional abutments compared to titanium implant-supported provisional abutments, as well as the effect of both materials on the presence of antibiotics resistance genes.
Peri-implant mucositis is an important disease entity as a result of its high prevalence and the lack of a standard mode of therapy. Non-surgical therapy of peri-implant mucositis appears to be partially effective in resolving the disease. In several cases, however, only limited improvements have been reported in the main clinical parameters (bleeding partial resolution and presence of pocket at follow-up visits) and there is a clear tendency to relapse of the disease. In these cases it is therefore recommended to consider adjunctive therapies. Numerous approaches have been used for implant surface decontamination including mechanical, chemical and treatments by means of air-powder or laser. The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial will be to assess the efficacy in improving clinical parameters of two further methods of implant surface decontamination (Er:YAG laser or air-abrasive device) after mechanical cleaning during non surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis.
This a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial comparing two techniques for the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis. The main objective of the present randomized controlled clinical trial is to determine whether the application of a novel treatment strategy for peri-implant mucositis could lead to significantly improved clinical parameters as compared to standard treatment. Half of the patients receives treatment with manual instruments and chlorhexidine gel 1%, half receives treatment with submucosal biofilm removal by erythritol powder.
In patients presenting peri-implant mucositis, effective sub-mucosal debridement is crucial to prevent peri-implantitis. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the 3-month clinical and microbiological effects of a locally delivered liquid desiccant agent with molecular hygroscopic properties, in association with sub-gingival manual debridement, in sites with peri-implant mucositis. Twenty-three patients presenting at least one implant with no radiographically detectable bone loss, a pocket probing depth ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing, were included in a 3-month randomized, parallel-groups, single-blind, prospective study. At baseline (T0), patients were randomly assigned to receive a desiccant liquid agent with molecular hygroscopic properties before debridement (Test-Group), or a Chlorhexidine 1% disinfectant gel after debridement (Control-Group). Treatments were performed also after 7 and 14 days. Peri- implant soft tissues assessment (PPD, BOP, mBI, VPI, mPLI) and microbial sampling were assessed at baseline and at 3-month follow-up (T1).
The present study aimed to investigate clinically the cleaning effectiveness of different treatment modalities, that is, oral irrigator or interdental brush usage addition to routine brushing and examine TGF-β1, IL-1β, t-PA, and PAI-1 levels in periimplant crevicular fluid of patients with periimplant mucositis. The null hypothesis was that oral irrigators would be effective compared to interdental brush in the oral care of individuals who use implant-supported protheses.