View clinical trials related to Perforated Diverticulitis.
Filter by:Perforated diverticulitis of the colon can be complicated by peritonitis, either purulent or fecal. Both are life threatening conditions requiring emergency surgery. The background in terms of reasons for inflammation (diverticulitis) and perforation to develop is unknown. In this study we focus on specific changes associated with inflammation, both in tissues and of fecal and mucosal microbiota.
The best approach for the treatment of perforated diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon is still under debate. Concurrent techniques are 1) resection with primary colorectal anastomosis with or without additional loop ileostomy; 2) end colostomy (Hartmann´s procedure); 3) Damage control strategy; 4) laparoscopic lavage and placement of a drainage. It is hypothesized, that the use of the damage control strategy leads to a significant reduction of the stoma rate. The damage control strategy constitutes a two stage procedure. Emergency surgery: limited resection of the diseased colonic segment with oral and aboral blind closure, abdominal lavage, temporary vacuum assisted abdominal closure Second look surgery (48-72 hours later): Reexploration with 1. definite reconstruction (Colorectal anastomosis -/+ diverting ileostomy vs. end colostomy) 2. lavage, vacuum assisted abdominal closure, third look 72 hours after emergency surgery Within the study, data of DCS-procedures will be collected retrospectively in a multicentric and transnational approach. Those will be compared to a cohort of patients treated with a "no-DCS"-technique (resection with primary anastomosis or Hartmann´s procedure).
The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical results and effect on health and well-being in patients operated for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis by laparoscopic lavage in Sweden when used outside of prospective studies/trials and in comparison with the traditional treatment, i.e. colon resection with or without stoma formation. A secondary aim is to evaluate the outcome after fecal peritonitis. The hypothesis is that laparoscopic lavage as treatment for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis is safe, efficient and cost saving, when used in routine health care.
The first objective (LOLA) of this integrated trial is to determine whether laparoscopic lavage leads to better clinical outcomes compared to sigmoidectomy in patients with perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis in terms of mortality and major morbidity. The second objective (DIVA) is to determine whether sigmoidectomy with anastomosis or sigmoidectomy with end-colostomy is the superior approach in patients with perforated diverticulitis with either purulent or faecal peritonitis in terms of stoma free survival. The study is designed as a multicenter and randomised trial.