View clinical trials related to Perennial Allergic Rhinitis.
Filter by:Single dose (four sprays) bioequivalence study of Azelastine Hydrochloride/ Fluticasone Propionate 137 microgram/50 microgram Nasal Spray and 'DYMISTA' (Azelastine Hydrochloride/Fluticasone Propionate) Nasal Spray 137 microgram/50 microgram in healthy adult human subjects.
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter of 3 active treatment groups, compared to 1 placebo group, for the determination of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (intermittent or persistent) allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and/or Dermatophagoides farinae.
Allergic rhinitis in children is common. According to the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC) phase III, the global prevalence of allergic rhinitis among children is increasing to 40.1% and the prevalence of allergic rhinitis in Bangkok area in 2018, among children aged 6-7 and 13-14 years was 16.32%. This disease is a global health problem affecting quality of life of patients in daily life, work, study and sleep. Intranasal corticosteroid is the most effective treatment for allergic rhinitis. From real world evidence; most of allergic rhinitis patient use the drug when symptoms worsen. In children, the use of intranasal corticosteroid may cause minor local side effects such as dryness, burning sensation or epistaxis. In some intranasal corticosteroid, long-term use may result in decreased growth compared to placebo which make parents concern. The investigators interested in studying the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid comparing between daily use and as needed use in children with allergic rhinitis. To study the appropriate form of treatment to increase cooperation. Patient will have a better quality of life and reduce the risk of side effects from prolonged use of intranasal corticosteroid. From the literature review, it was found that most studies were conducted among adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis In Thailand in 2020, Thongngam et al. studied the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid was compared between daily use and as needed use in adult patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. The results of the study concluded that the daily use group can reduced more TNSS (total nasal symptoms score) but was not statistically significant and had a greater increase in peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) compared to as needed group. Interestingly, the quality of life assessment (RCQ-36 score) in both2 groups improved equally, In as needed group, the cumulative dose was 51% lower than the daily dose group. The investigators want to compare the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid between daily versus as needed use in children with perennial allergic rhinitis which had not been studied before.
Alleviation of allergic symptoms induced by house dust mites when using the medical device AM-301. This clinical investigation explores the efficacy and safety of AM-301 when used to reduce symptoms of house dust mite sufferers. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of AM-301 Device between treated and non-treated subjects in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).
Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter of 3 active treatment groups, compared to 1 placebo group, for the determination of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis (intermittent or persistent) due to hypersensitivity to house dust mites (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and / or D. farinae) and grass pollen
Investigator examines the past prescription patterns and the reasons for the change of prescription to Monterizine capsules for Perennial Allergic Rhinitis patients with Asthma who will be taking Monterizine capsules to treat allergic rhinitis. After being given Monterizine capsules, Investigator evaluates the therapeutic effectiveness and safety for 3 months (or 6 months).
This prospective multicentric academic NAPT study aims to compile a database of all patients who initiate immunotherapy. The NAPT will take place before, during and after AIT to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of the treatment. The study consists of 4 visits and 2 telephone contacts that are repeated annually for 3 years. This study will be conducted in 2 hospitals: UZ Leuven and AZ ST. Jan Brugge on the consultation Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases (ENT) and the department of Internal Medicine / Allergology
Phase III Study to Demonstrate the non inferiority of PLURAIR® branded nasal topical Fluticasone Propionate (FP) in relation to the FLIXONASE® brand reference drug in the control of nasal symptoms related to perennial allergic rhinitis.
Efficacy and safety of HCP1102 in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis : A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter phase 3 clinical trial
In recent years, a number of randomized controlled trials have confirmed the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Indeed, the latest American clinical guidelines recommended acupuncture treatment for AR patients who are interested in non-pharmacological treatment. In conventional acupuncture treatment for AR, needles are inserted at specific acupoints in the body; with several studies demonstrating acupuncture of sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) to improve nasal symptoms and quality of life in nasal inflammatory diseases. The investigators hypothesize that, compared with sham acupuncture and rescue medication (RM), active SPG acupuncture combined with RM would lead to greater improvements in symptoms score and reduction in overall need for antihistamines. To test this hypothesis the investigators design a randomized, double blind, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of SPG acupuncture in perennial AR patients (allergic to indoor allergens, including house dust mite, fungi, animal dander and so one) and to explore the potential underlying mechanisms.