Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05725083
Other study ID # Epidural vs ESPB in PCNL
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date January 11, 2024
Est. completion date December 2025

Study information

Verified date January 2024
Source Assiut University
Contact keroles Heshmat Ghaly, MBBS
Phone 01271655519
Email kero.heshoo@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

compare the efficacy of Lower Thoracic Epidural with Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for post-operative analgesia after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with a hypothesis that both Lower Thoracic Epidural and Erector spinae plane block are effective in providing post-operative analgesia.


Description:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple or complex kidney or upper urinary tract stones, which necessitates the meticulous multi-modality analgesia due to mild to moderate pain originated from renal capsule dilation or nephrostomy-tube-related stress during the first 24 h after operation. The main sources of the acute pain after PCNL are visceral pain originating from the kidneys and ureters, and somatic pain from the site incision. Renal pain is conducted through T10-L1 spinal nerves while ureter pain is conducted through T10-L2. Moreover, cutaneous innervation of the site of the incision is predominantly supplied by T10-T11 (T8-T12) because the incision site and tract for PCNL is usually used in the tenth to eleventh intercostal space, or in the subcostal area Blockade of both somatic and visceral nerves that innervate skin, muscle, kidneys, and ureters is required for the achievement of adequate analgesia after PCNL. Complete blockade of unilateral spinal nerves from T10 to L2 can provide sufficient analgesia during PCNL. This can be achieved by several regional techniques such as Lower Thoracic Epidural , Thoracic paravertebral block, Transversus abdominis block, Erector spinae block, and peri-tubal local anaesthetic infiltration . PCNL surgery also has an increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications because the procedure is performed near the diaphragm, especially, when approached through the upper pole of the kidney which increases the possibility of pleural and lung injuries. with poor control of the postoperative pain, this can result in decreased inspiratory and vital capacities and increase the incidence of lung atelectasis and postoperative hypoxemia. Multimodal analgesia techniques are utilized broadly to manage postoperative pain. The concept of multimodal analgesia implies not only providing analgesic drugs, but also performing nerve blocks with local anaesthetics. Since Forrero et al. first described the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB), the indications and clinical use of the block for different surgical interventions have been growing . Although, ESPB is an interfascial plane block, anatomical studies support the idea that some of its clinical benefit may derive from spread to the paravertebral and epidural space. Regional anesthesia may reduce the rate of chronic pain after surgery . Thoracic epidural blockade (TEB) using local anesthetic agents has been widely regarded as the gold standard for analgesia and reduction of associated complications following surgery. Epidural analgesia was first accomplished by blockage with local anesthetics, and bupivacaine has been called the local anesthetic of choice for epidural infusion.. Epidural local anesthetics have been administered by continuous infusion in an attempt to minimize side effects , Nevertheless, hypotension as well as motor block , numbness , nausea and urinary retention have occurred. Good analgesia from an epidural block can result in relieving postoperative pain , early extubation, better ventilatory mechanics and gas exchange and reduced rates of lung collapse, pneumonia and pain . However, the technique requires highly trained medical staff not only for insertion and removal of the epidural catheter but also for the management of the continuous infusion of pain medication. The risks associated with insertion of the epidural include accidental dural puncture, inadvertent high block, local anesthetic toxicity and total spinal anesthesia (inadvertent spinal injection of an epidural dose of local anesthetic), nerve injury, epidural hematoma and abscess are rare but serious complications. Epidural is not a suitable technique for all patients and is contraindicated in patients with local infection, previous spinal surgery, disorders of blood clotting and in those taking anti-coagulant and anti-platelet therapy . Thus, in the current study the investigators aim to compare the post-operative analgesic effect of Lower Thoracic Epidural with that of ESPB after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 42
Est. completion date December 2025
Est. primary completion date December 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18 and 65 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m2 - patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II, - Patients scheduled for elective Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Exclusion Criteria: - Contraindication to local anesthesia : Allergy to local anaesthetics , Infection at the site of injection , Coagulopathy - Chronic pain syndromes - Prolonged opioid medication - Patients who received any analgesic 24 h before surgery.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Lower thoracic epidural
before induction of anesthesia,first the investigators identify the correct targeted thoracic level. All epidural block will be performed under all aseptic precautions with a 17-gauge Tuohy needle and 19 G flex-tip catheters. Using the loss of resistance to saline technique, catheter will be inserted 4 cm into the epidural space and a suitable test dose will be administered to exclude intravascular or sub-arachnoid injection. Bupivacaine 0.25% of 7.5-12 ml volume will be given bolus through the epidural catheter then continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% will be infused at a rate of 5 ml/h up to 15ml/h .for breakthrough pain patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using nalbuphine 1 mg bolus , 10 min lockout period . The catheter will be removed under complete aseptic precautions after 48 hrs.
Erector spinae plane block
before induction of anasthesia ,highfrequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation 2.5-3 cm lateral to the T9 spinous process. A 21G 10 cm needle will be inserted using an in plane approach. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the erector spinae muscle.confirmed by visible fluid spread lifting the erector spinae muscle off the bony shadow of the transverse process on ultrasonographic imaging.Then the catheter placement 5cm into the space under the erector spinae muscle and suitable test dose will be administered . Bupivacaine 0.25% of 7.5-12 ml volume will be given bolus through the catheter then continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.1% will be infused at a rate of 5 ml/h up to 15 ml/h , for breakthrough pain patient controlled analgesia (PCA) using nalbuphine 1mg bolus,10 min lockout period.The catheter will be removed under complete aseptic precautions after 48 hrs.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assiut University

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Total opioid consumption Total opioid used 48 hours postoperatively
Secondary First analgesic request When the patient first time need analgesia 48 hours postoperatively
Secondary Pain scores Numerical rating scale 48 hours postoperatively
Secondary Analgesic drug consumption other than Nalbuphine Another drug needed and it's consumption 48 hours postoperatively
Secondary Ambulation Time The time the patient first ambulated following the surgical procedure 48 hours postoperatively
Secondary Patient satisfaction with anathesia If the patient feels pain using Visual Analogue Scale 48 hours postoperativelyi
Secondary Heart rate in beats per minute Heart rate be stable during operation Intraoperatively
Secondary Mean arterial pressure in mmHg Be stable during operation Intraoperatively
Secondary Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting If the patient feels vomiting and nausea and when 48 hours
Secondary Block related complication If there is any complications as local anesthetic toxicity , pneumothorax and vascular puncture during block procedure 48 hours postoperatively
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05574517 - Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Without Reverse Insertion of a Ureteral Catheter N/A
Completed NCT02764008 - The Comparison of Low Thoracic Paravertebral Block Versus Peritubal Infiltration Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT06266793 - Comparison of Holmium Laser and Thulium Laser for Mini PCNL N/A
Recruiting NCT03907930 - Conventional PCNL Versus Tubeless PCNL N/A
Completed NCT05467878 - The Effect of Anesthesia on Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Completed NCT04340037 - Prediction of Sepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Not yet recruiting NCT03178292 - Conventional Antibiotic Prophylaxis Versus Add-On 5 Days Levofloxacin Before Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A
Completed NCT04346134 - Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04943081 - Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients With Stage 2-4 Chronic Kidney Disease N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04196270 - The Minimal Effective Volume (MEV90) of Ropivacaine 0.75% for Ultrasound-guided Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT03016650 - Opioid-sparing Effect of Intravenous Ibuprofen Phase 4
Completed NCT05855057 - Effectiveness of US-Guided PCNL Different Positions in Renal Stones Treatment
Completed NCT05947435 - Tranexamic Acid in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A
Recruiting NCT05077007 - Evaluation of Renal Damage After PCNL and ESWL Using Novel RNA Based Biomarkers N/A
Completed NCT03897933 - Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Patients: a Retrospective Study
Recruiting NCT05661175 - Application of One-handed Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A
Recruiting NCT06393062 - Gram Stain of the First Urine After Puncture in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A
Recruiting NCT05012215 - Paravertebral Versus Caudal Block in Pediatric PCNL N/A
Recruiting NCT04856722 - Mini-PNL, RIRS, and ESWL for Treatment of Medium-Sized, High-Density, Non-Lower Pole, Renal Stones N/A
Recruiting NCT04852874 - Quadratus Lumborum Block as an Anesthetic Method for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy N/A

External Links