Early Oral Feeding Versus Traditional Delayed Oral Feeding Post-perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair

Peptic Ulcer Perforation Clinical Trial

Official title: Early Oral Feeding Versus Traditional Delayed Oral Feeding Post-perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: A Comparative Study in Egyptian Tertiary Health Care Center

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

This study aims to evaluate safety and benefits of early oral feeding compared to traditional delayed oral feeding in patients undergoing perforated peptic ulcer repairs. Study population & Sample size :(

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design:

This study is a single-center, prospective, parallel arm, randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive either delayed oral feeding or early oral feeding.

Methods:

Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A patients followed an early oral feeding protocol(12 hours), and Group B received delayed oral feeding (72 hours).

Outcome parameter :

The outcomes are incidence of postoperative complications including Postoperative repair leakage, Infection-related postoperative complications , Number of days of hospital stay and return of bowel function and Diet intolerance. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Peptic Ulcer
• Peptic Ulcer Perforation
• Ulcer

• NCT number: NCT06042933
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: mohammed elshwadfy
• Phone: 00201025524630
• Email: m.elshwadfy1988@gmail.com
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 2, 2023
• Completion date: November 1, 2023