View clinical trials related to Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage.
Filter by:Find out if there is a significant difference between clinical outcome among the patients with bleeding peptic ulcer treated with oral omeprazole compared to those treated with intravenous omeprazole.
We prepare this study to compare the efficacy of intermittent intravenous PPI infusion (relatively low dose PPI therapy) than continous PPI infusion method. Our hypothesis is that intermittent (40mg as a bolus injection daily for 72 hours) PPI therapy is not inferior to conventional high dose therapy.
Acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with the use of low-dose aspirin (ASA) is a major cause of peptic ulcer bleeding worldwide. Among survivors of acute myocardial infarction, a study of over 14,000 patients reported that the risk of life-threatening GI bleeding in the first two months is 7 times higher than that in the subsequent months. After endoscopic control of ulcer bleeding, most patients with cardiovascular (CV) diseases will need to resume ASA. However, the investigator found that immediate resumption of ASA saves life but at the expense of higher risk of recurrent bleeding. Peptic ulcer bleeding associated with ASA is a major cause of hospitalization in Hong Kong. Currently, ASA use has contributed to about one-third of the bleeding ulcers admitted to our hospital that serves a local population of 1.5 million. Accordingly, current international guidelines recommend early resumption of ASA but the optimal timing is unknown. Clinicians often face the dilemma: when should ASA be resumed? Furthermore, patients who suffer from acute peptic ulcer bleeding are often elderly patients with significant co-morbidities. Mortality in these patients remains high. Clinicians are facing an increasing number of patients who are on antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants. The investigator proposes a open-label randomized-controlled trial to evaluate the optimal timing of resuming ASA in patients with CV diseases complicated by peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients will be randomized to resume the standard treatment within first few hours or only to resume the standard treatment 72 hours after endoscopic haemostasis.
The most common cause of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is non-variceal, where peptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) remains the single most common cause, accounting for 25% to 67% of the causes of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Despite major advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, PUB remains a significant problem and an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Given the imperative therapeutic role of endoscopic management in achieving hemostasis in NVUGIB, new modalities to improve the current treatment strategies continue to be developed. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a widely used throughout many fields of medicine for improving tissue regeneration. PRP contains a higher concentration of platelets than whole blood, and represents a pool of many growth-factors.
To compare in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial the efficacy and safety of OTSC versus TTS clip for first-line hemostasis of high risk bleeding peptic ulcers
This is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CEGP003 in patients with acute peptic ulcers bleeding, compared to endoscopic epinephrine injection therapy.
The purpose of this phase study is to confirm the efficacy and safety by compare ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcer bleeding were enrolled in a multi-center, stratified randomized, non-inferiority test, double-blind, parallel and positive-controlled trial. They were randomly assigned into two groups, ilaprazole and omeprazole, to be treated for up to 30 days. The primary endpoint was the hemostasis rate at the end of 72 hours. Secondary end points include ulcer staging changes within 72 hours, effective rate of hemostasis, hemostasis duration, average blood transfusion and rebleeding rate, etc.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole and omeprazole in the treatment and prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients with endoscopically diagnosed peptic ulcer bleeding were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel and positive-controlled trial. They were randomly assigned into two groups, ilaprazole and omeprazole, to be treated for up to 30 days and be seen at day 3, 4, 7, 14 and 30. The primary endpoint was the hemostasis rate (hemostatic groups with endoscopy check ) and re-bleeding rate ( bleeding groups with endoscopy check) within 72 hours. Secondary end points include effective rate of hemostasis, mean volume of blood transfusion, the length of stay and re-bleeding rate, etc.
Determining the efficacy of low dose of PPI in management acute peptic ulcer bleeding
Evaluate the efficacy of Two different regimens of proton pump inhibitors High against Low in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding