Bacterial Infection Due to Helicobacter Pylori (H. Pylori) Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Long-term Prospective Cohort Study of Testing for Helicobacter Pylori and the Long-term Risk of Peptic Ulcer Bleeding With Low-dose Aspirin
Low-dose aspirin (ASA) has emerged as the most important cause of peptic ulcer bleeding
worldwide. In western countries, ASA has overtaken non steroidal antiinflammatory drugs
(NSAIDs) as a major cause of peptic ulcer bleeding in the elderly population [1,2].
Management of peptic ulcer bleeding in patients receiving ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases
is a clinical dilemma. In a randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted ASA therapy
after endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding, patients who discontinued ASA had a
10-fold increased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to those who received continuous
ASA therapy. On the other hand, patients receiving continuous ASA therapy had a two-fold
increased risk of early rebleeding [3]. Thus, preventing the occurrence of peptic ulcer
bleeding in ASA users is important in reducing morbidity and mortality.
Given the uncertain clinical utility of Helicobacter Pylori (Hp) testing in ASA users, this
prospective cohort study aims to determine whether testing for Hp will have any impact on
the long-term incidence of ulcer bleeding in ASA users with high ulcer risk. The
investigators hypothesize that among ASA users with Hp infection and ulcer bleeding, the
long-term incidence of recurrent ulcer bleeding with ASA use will be low after eradication
of Hp alone.
Low-dose aspirin (ASA) has emerged as the most important cause of peptic ulcer bleeding
worldwide. In western countries, ASA has overtaken NSAIDs as a major cause of peptic ulcer
bleeding in the elderly population [1,2]. Management of peptic ulcer bleeding in patients
receiving ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases is a clinical dilemma. In a randomized trial of
continuous versus interrupted ASA therapy after endoscopic treatment of peptic ulcer
bleeding, patients who discontinued ASA had a 10-fold increased incidence of all-cause
mortality compared to those who received continuous ASA therapy. On the other hand, patients
receiving continuous ASA therapy had a two-fold increased risk of early rebleeding [3].
Thus, preventing the occurrence of peptic ulcer bleeding in ASA users is important in
reducing morbidity and mortality.
Emerging evidence from secondary analysis of cardiovascular trials suggests that aspirin
also reduces the risk of all cancers, even at cardioprotective doses [4]. With increasing
use of ASA for cardiothrombotic diseases and cancer prevention, the global burden of
ASA-associated peptic ulcer disease is expected to increase.
A number of risk factors are known to increase the risk of peptic ulcer bleeding with ASA
use. These include a history of peptic ulcer or ulcer bleeding, old age, renal failure,
concurrent use of ASA and clopidogrel, and Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection [5-7]. Among
these risk factors, concomitant use of clopidogrel and a history of peptic ulcer bleeding
and are important predictors of ulcer bleeding with ASA use [7]. On the other hand, Hp is
the only risk factor that can be modified. Eradication of Hp therefore offers a hope of
reducing the risk of ulcer bleeding in ASA users.
Current European and U.S. guidelines unanimously recommend test-and-treat Hp infection in
ASA users who are at risk of ulcer bleeding [8-10]. Despite these guidelines, the long-term
benefit of eradicating Hp in high-risk ASA users is uncertain.
In a 6-month randomized trial of ASA users with Hp infection complicated by ulcer bleeding,
patients were randomized to one-week of Hp eradication therapy alone or maintenance
treatment with omeprazole after ulcers has healed. Our results showed that the incidence of
recurrent ulcer bleeding was comparable between the group receiving Hp eradication alone
(1.9%) and the group receiving omeprazole (0.9%) [11]. In another 12-month randomized trial,
ASA users with Hp infection complicated by ulcer bleeding were randomized to one-week of
eradication therapy alone or one week of eradication therapy plus maintenance treatment with
lansoprazole. In this study, up to 15% of ASA users developed recurrent ulcer bleeding after
eradication of Hp alone. Among the ASA users who developed recurrent ulcer bleeding,
however, over two-thirds had failure Hp eradication or used concomitant NSAIDs [12].
In light of these conflicting findings, current guidelines recommend that co-therapy with a
proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) is still needed in high-risk ASA users after eradication of Hp
[8-10]. Since PPIs are more effective in preventing ASA-associated ulcers in the presence of
Hp infection [13], the clinical relevance of testing for Hp in high-risk ASA users becomes
even more questionable. To date, the strategy of test-and-treat Hp for ASA users is not
popular among primary care doctors or specialists.
One alternative gastroprotective strategy is to prescribe PPIs to all ASA users at high risk
of ulcer bleeding and ignore Hp testing. However, poor compliance to gastroprotective
co-therapy limits its effectiveness. Recently, health authorities issued warning about the
the use of PPI and the risk of hip fractures and potential adverse drug-interactions between
PPI and clopidogrel [14,15]. Clopidgorel is commonly used in combination with ASA for
preventing coronary stent thrombosis but dual anti-platelet therapy will substantially
increase the risk of ulcer bleeding [5]. If eradication of Hp can reduce the long-term risk
of ulcer bleeding with ASA use, there may be a potential hope of limiting PPI use to very
high risk ASA users.
Given the uncertain clinical utility of Hp testing in ASA users, this prospective cohort
study aims to determine whether testing for Hp will have any impact on the long-term
incidence of ulcer bleeding in ASA users with high ulcer risk. The investigators hypothesize
that among ASA users with Hp infection and ulcer bleeding, the long-term incidence of
recurrent ulcer bleeding with ASA use will be low after eradication of Hp alone.
;
Observational Model: Case Control, Time Perspective: Prospective
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02553083 -
High Dose Dual Therapy (HDDT) for Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01897909 -
The Impact of Helicobacter Pylori Infection on Immune Regulation and Clinical Course in HIV Patients in Ghana
|
||
Completed |
NCT02160860 -
Epidemiology of Helicobacter Pylori Infection Among Shanghai Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03367897 -
Bleeding Ulcer and Erosions Study "BLUE Study"
|
||
Completed |
NCT01506986 -
Helicobacter Eradication Aspirin Trial
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01572597 -
Increased Re-eradication Rate of Helicobacter Pylori by Adding N-acetylcystein or Metronidazole to the Triple Therapy
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02164409 -
Changes Associated With H. Pylori and Gastric Carcinogenesis
|
||
Completed |
NCT01623154 -
POCone-UBiT-IR300 Pediatric Comparison Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03124199 -
Rifaximin Associated With Classic Triple Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02674802 -
Reinfection After Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori Infection
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02092506 -
RCT: Triple vs Sequential vs Concomitant Therapy H Pylori
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01902589 -
Resistance of Helicobacter Pylori to Antibiotics in Children
|
N/A |