View clinical trials related to Penicillin Allergy.
Filter by:A investigational study to establish: 1. A validated cllinical pathway for delabeling declared Penicillin allergiy outside allergologic departments. 2. A survey to examine anesthesiologists attitudes and knowledge about penicillin delabeling. 3. A qualitative focus group study investigating barriers and facilitators in penicillin delabeling among hospital nurses and physichians. 2. Implement the pathway for delabeling declared penicillin allergy outside allergologic clinics across the Western Norway health region.
The study will identify pediatric patients 3-18 years old who have penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical record. Those who are identified will be stratified into no-risk, low-risk and high-risk category using a screening questionnaire. The following definitions will be followed: No-risk: Patients who are historically labeled with penicillin allergy in the EMR based on family history alone OR those who have tolerated penicillin after a concerning incident without any reaction OR with penicillin allergy label but deny any history of reaction to any form of penicillin on screening questionnaire Low-risk: Patients with previous reaction not suggestive of anaphylaxis (defined below) AND not requiring hospitalization for the reaction OR reaction considered non- immunologic (e.g. diarrhea, nausea, yeast vaginitis) OR exposure to penicillin- containing antibiotic after the date of reported reaction with no anaphylaxis and hospitalization AND no serious types of delayed reactions such as Steven- Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), drug-induced hepatitis or other documented organ injury, drug rash eosinophilia systemic symptoms (DRESS), hemolytic anemia, drug-induced cytopenia, and serum sickness. Patients who had delayed reaction (onset more than 24 hours) of isolated, non-progressive symptoms (such as rash/hives alone) also belong to this group. High-risk: Patients with penicillin allergy label on EMR with previous reaction suggestive of anaphylaxis (defined below) OR requiring hospitalization/epinephrine administration for the reaction OR reactions considered immunologic (angioedema, joint pains) OR involving serious types of reactions such as Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), drug-induced hepatitis or other documented organ injury, drug rash eosinophilia systemic symptoms (DRESS), hemolytic anemia, drug-induced cytopenia, and serum sickness. Patients who were previously diagnosed with penicillin allergy by an allergist also belong to the high-risk group. Patients in the no-risk group will be immediately delabeled. Patients in the high-risk group will be referred to allergy/immunology for further work up. The focus of this study is to identify the patients who belong to the low-risk group. This group of patients will be subjected to graded oral amoxicillin challenge testing. Those who will have reactions compatible with allergy will have their allergy status retained in the electronic medical record. Those that will not have reactions or those that will have reactions that are not compatible with allergy will be delabeled in the electronic medical record.
While reported adverse reactions to penicillins are common, most patients with a penicillin allergy label can safely tolerate penicillins, and elective evaluation for penicillin allergy has been recommended. For low-risk patients, direct oral challenge may be an optimal approach as a delabeling strategy. However, there is a vast disparity between the number of patients with a penicillin allergy label and practicing allergists in the United States, and implementing outpatient primary care-based delabeling strategies in low-risk patients may increase access to delabeling assessments. However, a recent survey of pediatricians identified perceived barriers to implementing penicillin allergy evaluations into their routine care. Significant gaps in knowledge exist regarding the feasibility of this approach involving risk stratification evaluation of reported penicillin adverse reactions and direct amoxicillin challenge procedures in low-risk patients in the pediatric primary care setting. With this, the primary aim of this study is to evaluate the number of patients for which risk-stratification and direct amoxicillin challenge are successfully completed in an outpatient pediatric primary care clinic.
Demonstration project to implement penicillin allergy testing in STD outpatients using a questionnaire and pen allergy testing
Children are often reported to have antibiotics allergies, with approximately 10% of the US population labeled as allergic to an antibiotic. Recent studies have demonstrated that a large majority of children with a penicillin allergy label do not have a true IgE-mediated allergy. Appropriately delabeling antibiotic allergies has been shown to improve patient care outcomes and lower health care costs. However, efforts to implement these assessments in practice are lacking, particularly in the hospital setting. Therefore, there is a need for hospital-based risk assessment and delabeling strategies for hospitalized children. The investigator's objective is to determine the feasibility of implementing a hospital-based approach to penicillin allergy risk stratification and evaluation of patients at low-risk for true allergy.
Penicillin is one of the earliest discovered antibiotics and a drug of choice for several infections. Up to 10 to 20% of all patients in clinical trial are labeled as penicillin allergic. Most of these patients do not have a true allergy but few have had it verified. Approximately 80% of patients with IgE-mediated penicillin allergy lose their sensitivity after 10 years. Several studies have been conducted denying the risk of sensitization following negative testing of penicillin allergy. Investigators have not had the same experience and have therefore decided to conduct a retrospective study review of 83 adult outpatients with a distant penicillin allergy label and evaluate outcomes of skin retesting six weeks following Drug Provocation Test and challenge.
Currently it is estimated that at least 25 million people in the United States are labeled as penicillin allergic although less than 1.5 million of these are truly allergic. Although combined skin testing and oral challenge is an evidence-based de-labeling strategy the high burden of penicillin allergy labels means these services are available only through specialty allergy practices. There is therefore a need to provide evidence for alternative penicillin de-labeling strategies such as direct oral challenge. Previous studies have utilized quasi-experimental designs. Test dose challenges are currently recommended as a strategy for removal of low risk drug allergies, but the current experience is limited to single arm observational studies and evidence-based strategies for identifying low risk patients are lacking. The investigators objective is to demonstrate the benefit of providing risk stratification in removing penicillin allergy labels for low risk penicillin allergy patients in a single arm intervention pilot trial in the ICU setting, which will pave the way for a future stepped wedge randomized control trial (stepped wedge trial entered separately in clinical trials.gov as NCT03702270)
Currently it is estimated that at least 25 million people in the United States are labeled as penicillin allergic although less than 1.5 million of these are truly allergic. Although combined skin testing and oral challenge is an evidence-based de-labeling strategy the high burden of penicillin allergy labels means these services are available only through specialty allergy practices. There is therefore a need to provide evidence for alternative penicillin de-labeling strategies such as direct oral challenge. Previous studies have utilized quasi-experimental designs. Test dose challenges are currently recommended as a strategy for removal of low risk drug allergies, but the current experience is limited to single arm observational studies and evidence-based strategies for identifying low risk patients are lacking. Our objective is to demonstrate the benefit of providing risk stratification in removing penicillin allergy labels for low risk penicillin allergy patients in a randomized controlled trial.
Our primary objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing a novel penicillin allergy questionnaire in the PED to identify a low-risk group of patients who will complete an oral challenge in the PED to test for an IgE-mediated allergic reaction. This was a 3-site pediatric emergency department study in which we challenged patients who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and were deemed low-risk. Original aims included: Aim 1: Demonstrate that a low-risk group of children with reported penicillin allergy will complete an oral penicillin challenge during a pediatric emergency department visit. Aim 2: Conduct follow-up one day after oral challenge for all children and seven days after oral challenge for patients discharged with a prescription antibiotic to determine if a delayed or T-Cell mediated reaction occurs after exposure to multiple doses of penicillin or any other antibiotic prescribed at discharge. Aim 3: Examine health care outcomes and prescription-related costs associated with illness treatment plans in children who are de-labeled as penicillin allergic after an oral challenge. A secondary objective within the IRB protocol reports, "Our secondary objective is to examine whether health care outcomes and prescription-related costs are comparable between children who are de-labeled as penicillin allergic after an oral challenge compared to a standard of care group who are not challenged in the PED." However, we never proceeded with enrolling patients with PCN allergy not challenged in the PED as it was planned for later in the study that did not come to fruition.
The investigators are conducting a prospective study to determine the safety and outcomes of placebo-controlled graded drug challenges without prior skin testing in patients with a low-risk history of antibiotic hypersensitivity reaction based on history alone. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of reaction to graded drug challenges without prior skin testing in patients with a low-risk history of drug hypersensitivity reaction based on history alone will not be meaningfully more than the rate of reaction to placebo. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of adverse reactions to drug challenges without prior skin testing will not be meaningfully more than the rate of adverse reactions with prior skin testing as was observed in the investigators' historical clinic cohort.