View clinical trials related to Pelvic Tumor.
Filter by:Background: Acetabular reconstruction in situ after extensive pelvic resection is technically challenging because the significant loss of bone stock and bony landmarks. The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of an individualized navigation template for acetabular reconstruction following pelvic malignancy resection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent type II or II+III pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction using a modular hemipelvic prosthesis. In the template-guided group (n = 10), a navigation template was designed and applied to assist acetabular reconstruction. In the traditional operation group (n = 14), the patients underwent the same surgery but without the navigation template. To compare the displacement of the hip rotation center before and after surgery between the two groups, an innovative method based on pelvic CT was developed and a validation group of cases was used to assess the effectiveness of this measurement approach. In the validation group (n = 12), patients undergoing periacetabular puncture or curettage without hip joint reconstruction were included. The displacements for the validation group were calculated and compared with 0 cm, the theoretical value. Subsequently, the displacements between the template-guided group and the traditional operation group were compared.
Radiotherapy (combined with chemotherapy) is commonly used in the curative treatment of pelvic tumours, such as in cervical, vulvar and anal cancer. In these patients, cure rates are high but may be associated with significant treatment-related toxicities, especially dermatologic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary and hematologic toxicity. Accurate treatment planning and dose delivery is essential for radiotherapy in order to be effective in terms of local tumour control and to reduce radiation-induced side effects. However, accuracy is challenged by tumour and organ motion from fraction to fraction (interfraction movements). At present, radiotherapy treatment planning is typically performed on one planning-CT scan which is performed before the start of the treatment. However, interfraction set up variations and organ motions can lead to differences between the calculated dose distribution on the planning-CT and the radiation dose actually received by the tumour and normal organs (actual given dose). Current photon radiotherapy of the pelvic area is relatively insensitive to these changes and margins from CTV to PTV ensures an adequate dose coverage of the tumour area. Despite newer techniques in photon therapy, like intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), critical organs still receive a substantial amount of dose leading to clinically relevant acute and late side effects. With proton beam therapy, the amount of radiation dose to the organs at risk can be significantly reduced. For proton beam therapy (PBT) however, knowledge of tumour and organ motion will be more important. The major potential advantages of PBT for tumours in the pelvic area in terms of prevention of radiation-induced side effects are challenged by differences in bladder volume, rectal filling and air gaps especially in the small bowel, sigmoid and rectum. Setup errors and organ motion cause geometric displacement of the tumours and normal tissues, which deteriorates the dose gradients from target volume to normal tissue. Furthermore, it can result in changes in tissue densities in the beam path, which can alter the position of the Bragg peaks, in turn leading to distorted dose distributions, usually manifesting as significant local under and/or over dosage. In this study, the investigators want to evaluate the impact of inter and intrafractional tumour and organ motion on photon and proton radiotherapy treatment planning in order to create robust intensity modulated photon- and/or proton treatment plans (IMRT, IMPT) with the final aim to lower treatment related toxicity. Objective: To explore the extent of inter- and intrafraction anatomical changes of the tumour and surrounding normal tissues, throughout the full course of treatment, and to subsequently assess the impact of these changes on the nominal planned dose. This information is required to design robust treatment plans (photon and/or proton) that will ensure optimal local tumour control while reducing toxicity. Study design: Pilot-study (40 patients). Study population: Patients with cervical, vulvar or anal cancer, who are planned for radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy) with curative intent. Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable. Main study parameters/endpoints: Robustness parameters (homogeneity index; coverage of clinical target volume), dose to organs at risk (OARs), such as the small bowel, rectum, bladder and bone marrow. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: During the radiotherapy treatment course, patients will undergo weekly repeat planning CT scans without contrast agents in order to evaluate the impact of intra and inter-fraction tumour and organ motion. The additional radiation dose of these 5 extra CT's is relatively low (5 x 8 mSv, plus 1 x 22 mSv for the 4D CT scan) in relation to the therapeutic radiation dose (50.4-85 Gy). The risks are therefore negligible and the burden is low.