Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05707533 |
Other study ID # |
2021833 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
November 30, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2023 |
Source |
West China Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
After obtaining an institutional ethics approval (#2021833), the investigators
retrospectively reviewed patients with Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who underwent Transvaginal
Mesh (TVM) in their hospital during June 2008 and December 2020. The goal of this
observational study is to introduce the Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant
Technique in Transvaginal mesh surgery, and to report long term efficacy and safety results
of this technique. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How to reduce the potential risk of mesh-related complications when performing TVM?
- How effective is the use of the Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant
Technique when performing TVM? Participants will be asked to fill the Pelvic Floor
Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) at final follow-up, and the Prosthesis/Graft Complication
Classification Code was used to record the mesh-related complications.
Description:
Patients and materials The investigators retrospective reviewed consecutive patients with
stage II to IV Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) who underwent Transvaginal Mesh (TVM) at their
center from June 2008 to December 2020. The Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical
Implant Technique was performed on all patients. Informed consent was obtained from all
included patients. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee of our
hospital (West China Hospital, Sichuan University).
The pre-cut mesh kits including Gynecare Prolift® (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ, USA), Perigee
(AMS, Minnetonka, MN, USA), and Gynecare Prosima® (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ, USA) and
self-cut mesh Gynemesh (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ, USA) were applied for transvaginal mesh
repair in this study. Surgery was performed by an experienced surgeon (Dr. HS), utilizing the
vaginal adventitia reserved and anatomical implant technique.
Outcome measures The effect of operation was assessed using both objective and subjective
measures. The objective assessment (anatomic assessment) of success was that the nadir of
prolapse never reached the point 0 (the level of hymen). The subjective assessment of success
was the absence of prolapse symptoms. Chinese version of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
(PFDI-20) was also utilized for assessing the outcomes. Prosthesis/Graft Complication
Classification Code was used to record the mesh-related complications.
Data analysis Statistical analysis was performed via the commercially available statistical
package (SPSS) 22.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables were
represented using frequency and percentages and compared using the chi-square test.
Continuous variables in accord with normal distribution were described using means and
standard deviations (SDs) and analyzed using the Student's t-test. Statistical significance
was defined at P < 0.05.