Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The CREDE pilot randomized study will compare the intraoperative Crede manoeuver (M1) to preoperative prolapse (POP) reduction cough stress test (M2) for the prediction and prevention of PONSUI. The rates of PONSUI and its effect on patient reported outcomes and quality of life will be determined among women with positive or negative tests, and those with and without concomitant anti-incontinence procedure performed. This information will help inform larger studies on the topic.


Clinical Trial Description

Primary objective - To assess feasibility of a pilot study to test this hypothesis with the goal to conduct a full trial (sample size calculation, validation of instruments used, randomization processes) - To estimate the rate of subjective PONSUI at 6 weeks and at 6 months in continent women undergoing POP surgical repair where a positive intraoperative Crede maneuver (M1) vs. a positive preoperative prolapse reduction stress test (M2) are used to select candidates for concomitant anti-incontinence procedure (either 1. retropubic midurethral sling (MUS) or 2. periurethral bulking injections) Secondary objectives I. To compare the estimated rate of objective PONSUI at 6 weeks and at 6 months (as determined by cough stress test) in continent women undergoing POP surgical repair where a positive intraoperative Crede maneuver (M1) vs. a positive preoperative prolapse reduction stress test (M2) are used to select candidates for concomitant anti-incontinence procedure II. To compare the rate of urinary symptoms and the effect on quality of life at 6 weeks and 6 months between M1 and M2, by Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7) III. To describe the risk of complications in patients having either maneuvers (M1, M2), including bladder perforation, voiding dysfunction, urinary tract infection and mesh exposure IV. To assess the concordance/discordance rate of M1 and M2 to compare the predictive subjective and objective PONSUI values of both maneuvers by test results and by anti-incontinence procedure Methodology This is a pilot randomized controlled study of two parallel groups, in a sample of 110 continent women undergoing surgical correction of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The sample will be drawn from women presenting to three urogynecologists at St-Mary's hospital and McGill University Health Center (MUHC). Intervention: The patients will be randomized in two groups, allocated in a 1:1 ratio. All participants will undergo both methods to evaluate their risk of PONSUI. Method 1 (M1) consists in intraoperative Crede maneuver. Method 2 (M2) consists in a preoperative prolapse reduction stress test. In group A: A positive M1 will determine performance of anti-incontinence procedure. In group B: A positive M2 will determine performance of anti-incontinence procedure. Surgical Procedure In both groups, women will have their planned surgery for POP correction under spinal (regional) or general anesthesia. The POP repair followed by the M1 will be performed for all women. The result of preoperative M2 won't be available to surgeon at the moment of performing M1. If the PONSUI prediction test for which the patient had been randomized to is positive, we will perform the anti-incontinence procedure selected by the patient (1. retropubic midurethral sling (MUS), or 2. periurethral bulking injections) after the POP repair. Placement of MUS and periurethral bulking injections will follow standardized reported technique. After the surgical procedure, a Foley catheter or suprapubic catheter will be inserted, and removed on postoperative day one. After catheter removal, a trial of void protocol is in place at our institutions. If post void residual volume by bladder scanner is over 250 mL, the Foley catheter will be reinserted and left in place for one week (or the suprapubic catheter will be kept for one week), while prophylactic antibiotics are given. Randomization: To address potential imbalances across study groups a computer-generated (SAS version 9.4) randomization schedule will be stratified by surgeon (3-5 different surgeons) and type of incontinence procedure chose (1. MUS, 2. Bulking), using random block sizes of 2 or 4, with an allocation ratio of 1:1. In order to ensure allocation concealment, the research assistant will first verify eligibility and informed consent, and then assign a study ID to each participant. Prior to the surgical procedure, the research assistant will enter this information plus the surgeon and incontinence procedure type into an automated interface prepared by the statistician. The result of randomization will be available to the surgeon only in the operating room (OR), after both the preoperative M2 and the intraoperative M1 have been performed. Specifically, the primary surgeon will be blinded until immediately after the M1 is performed and the result is recorded. The research assistant will have left an envelope with the randomization group in the OR prior to the beginning of the procedure. This envelope will be opened after the M1 is performed. The result of M2 will also be available if the woman is randomized to group B. Sample size consideration: Approximately 200 patients undergo POP surgical repair surgery per year in the two centers where the study will be conducted. For the pilot study, we are planning to recruit 100 eligible patients (50 per group) into the study with an added 10% estimated dropout rate for an overall total of 110 patients (55 per group). To the best of our knowledge, no previous study exists which would allow us to perform the appropriate sample size calculations. To do so, we would need some estimate of the rate of subjective PONSUI after intraoperative Crede maneuver (M1) at 6 weeks and 6 months. It is one of the purposes of this pilot project to determine such a parameter for planning a future randomized controlled trial. The rate of subjective PONSUI after preoperative prolapse reduction stress test (M2) varies around 14%, 54%, 17%, 26% for positive tests with and without anti-incontinence surgery and for negative tests with and without anti-incontinence surgery respectively. We thus estimate an overall rate of 30% PONSUI with the use of the preoperative prolapse reduction stress test. In the absence of an educated guess, we have verified that with our sample size (50 in each group) the minimal significant difference of 22% (30% vs 8%) between two groups PONSUI rates could be detected with a power of at least 80% using Pearson chi-squared and a confidence level of α = 0.05. Also, a set of relevant baseline imbalances will be pre-specified (recruitment site and prolapse stage "II vs III-IV") and a stratified randomization will be performed. Data gathering Variables collected will include age, medication (including hormonal therapy), smoking status, diabetes, past obstetrical history (including parity, vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections), previous surgery for POP (type), previous hysterectomy, menopausal status, daytime frequency and nocturia. Patient will also answer validated questionnaires on urinary symptoms and impact on quality of life including: 1. Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and 2. Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7). At baseline, physical examination will be performed by one of the three participating urogynecologists or one of the urogynecology fellows. It will include POP-Q evaluation, genitourinary atrophy assessment, myofascial pain (pain at palpation of the vaginal muscles), and the preoperative prolapse reduction stress test (M2) for all women (positive/negative). After the exam, women will be asked to urinate and we will estimate the post void residual volume (urine left into the bladder after a micturition) with a bladder scanner. At the moment of the surgery to correct the POP, all of the women will have a Crede maneuver assessment (M1). The result of the test will be noted (positive/negative). Information collected at the time of the surgery will include date, type of surgery, type of anesthesia (general or regional), estimated blood loss, perioperative complications (as bladder and urethral perforation or hemorrhage). Postoperative complications such as postoperative urinary retention (use of Foley/suprapubic catheter for seven days or more), and urinary tract infection will also be recorded. Women will follow the usual postoperative visit calendar used in our institutions (visit 6 weeks and 6 months after the surgery). They will fill the same two questionnaires (UDI-6 and UIQ-7) that they answered at the beginning of the study. A blinded urogynecologist or a fellow in urogynecology will perform an examination. The amount of urine into the bladder will be estimated with a bladder scanner. A cough stress test will be done with an amount estimated between 250-350 mL of urine. The patient will be asked to drink water if the bladder is not full enough. The women have to cough strongly while in supine position. The examiner will note if he sees urine leakage (positive test) or not (negative test). He/she will also do a vaginal examination to note prolapse stage (POP-Q), and if there are any complication including mesh erosion or extrusion and important pain. The research assistant will be involved at the time of women's recruitment, to ensure patient randomization, to coordinate postoperative examinations by a blinded examiner, and for data collection. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT04087642
Study type Interventional
Source McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Contact Maryse Larouche, MD, MPH
Phone 1-514-934-1934
Email ml.larouche@mcgill.ca
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date September 1, 2019
Completion date March 1, 2026

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05422209 - The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05420831 - Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment N/A
Completed NCT05493735 - Lidocaine for Pessary Check Pain Reduction Phase 3
Completed NCT06126328 - Materna Prep Study Phase II Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05542836 - EVeRLAST 2-Year Follow-Up
Recruiting NCT05918367 - Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative
Recruiting NCT04172272 - The Influence of TAP Block in the Control of Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy for Gynecological Procedures N/A
Recruiting NCT04807920 - BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB Phase 4
Completed NCT06268782 - The Effectiveness of an Online Exercise Program on Well-being of Postpartum Women N/A
Recruiting NCT02919852 - Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia N/A
Recruiting NCT03146195 - The 3D Reconstruction Research of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Disease N/A
Completed NCT02925585 - Vaginal Tactile Imaging for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
Not yet recruiting NCT02536001 - Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes N/A
Recruiting NCT02113969 - Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol N/A
Completed NCT02383199 - Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery N/A
Terminated NCT01673360 - Collection of Long Term Patient Outcomes Data Following Implantation of AMS Surgical Devices N/A
Completed NCT01842464 - Sacro-Spinous Ligaments Anterior Apical Anchoring N/A
Withdrawn NCT01530191 - Factors Affecting Perioperative Outcomes N/A
Completed NCT01320631 - Male Sexual Experience and Its Impact on Quality of Life Before and After Their Sexual Partners Undergo Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstruction N/A
Completed NCT00581412 - Composite Graft Use in Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Reduces Erosion Rates N/A