Pelvic Organ Prolapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Continuous Suture for Mesh Fixation
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation.
Introduction Pelvic-organ prolapse, in which the pelvic organs (uterus, bladder, and bowel)
protrude into or past the vaginal introitus, is a condition often treated with surgery. Women
have an 11 percent risk of surgery for prolapse or urinary incontinence by 80 years of age,
and of this 11 percent, almost one third of the women have a second surgery. This fact points
to the need for improved treatment of pelvic-floor disorders. Numerous surgical procedures
have been described for the management of POP. Vaginal surgery may be associated with less
postoperative pain and a more rapid return to daily living than abdominal repair. However, in
a randomised study, sacrocolpopexy was twice as likely to result in optimal anatomical
outcome as vaginal surgery. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides the potential to combine the
success rates of an abdominal approach with the faster recovery associated with a minimally
invasive technique. Tissue dissection and mesh placement may also be facilitated by the
magnification and field of view permitted by the laparoscopic approach. These benefits must
be balanced against a longer operating time from 150 to 250 minutes according to surgeons'
experience. In addition, this procedure is often associated to subtotal hysterectomy (LSH)
for the reasons of prevention (post-menopause age) or uterine diseases, which improve still
more the operating time.
This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a
standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment
of POP could be further reduced using using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional
5-points single suture for anterior mesh fixation.
Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative
complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of
hospitalization and costs for the health care system.
Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized
clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.
To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.
Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.
There will be recruited 20 patients to treat using continuous locked suture and 20 patients
to treat with standard 5-points single suture for mesh fixation comparing these two
techniques in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss and other intra- or post
operative complications, postoperative pain, days of hospitalization, costs. All patients
will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an
informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be
prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with
intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a
database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment
(analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery).
Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery
according to Dindo's classification.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05422209 -
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05420831 -
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05493735 -
Lidocaine for Pessary Check Pain Reduction
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06126328 -
Materna Prep Study Phase II
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05542836 -
EVeRLAST 2-Year Follow-Up
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05918367 -
Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04172272 -
The Influence of TAP Block in the Control of Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy for Gynecological Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04807920 -
BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06268782 -
The Effectiveness of an Online Exercise Program on Well-being of Postpartum Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03146195 -
The 3D Reconstruction Research of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Disease
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02919852 -
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02925585 -
Vaginal Tactile Imaging for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02536001 -
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02113969 -
Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02383199 -
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01673360 -
Collection of Long Term Patient Outcomes Data Following Implantation of AMS Surgical Devices
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01842464 -
Sacro-Spinous Ligaments Anterior Apical Anchoring
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01530191 -
Factors Affecting Perioperative Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01320631 -
Male Sexual Experience and Its Impact on Quality of Life Before and After Their Sexual Partners Undergo Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00581412 -
Composite Graft Use in Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Reduces Erosion Rates
|
N/A |