Pelvic Organ Prolapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Evaluation of the Uphold Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Uterine-predominant Prolapse: a Prospective, Multicenter Trial
Verified date | January 2017 |
Source | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the UpholdTM LITE mesh over a 12 month follow up period, using a composite outcome including a good anatomical correction for both anterior and apical compartments (stage 0 or 1), no prolapse (bulge) symptoms (answer "no" at question 3 of the PFDI-20) and no reintervention for recurrent prolapse of the anterior or apical compartment.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 121 |
Est. completion date | July 15, 2016 |
Est. primary completion date | July 15, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 50 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent - The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan - The patient is available for 12 months of follow-up - Patients with symptoms and altered quality of life in relation to uterine or post-hysterectomy vault prolapse - Patients who are receiving the UpholdTM LITE mesh Kit - Female patients >= years who have no desire of future pregnancy - Diagnosed with pelvic organ prolapse and >= ICS POP-Q Stage 2 Symptomatic Prolapse apical compartment (uterine or vault), associated with ICS POP-Q Stage 2 or 3 Symptomatic Prolapse anterior compartment (point Ba >= -1 - Patients willing to complete quality of life questionnaire at baseline (pre-procedure) and at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-procedure Exclusion Criteria: - The patient is participating in another study - The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study - The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship - The patient refuses to sign the consent - It is impossible to correctly inform the patient - The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding - Patients who are not receiving the UpHoldTM LITE mesh Kit - Patients < 50 years - Patients qho, according to the clinical judgment of the investigator, are not suitable for this study - Patients who are considering future pregnancies - Patients whose pelvic organ prolapse is a <= 1 ICS Stage - Patients requiring Posterior Graft procedure - Patients with known or suspected hypersensitivity to polypropylene - Patients with any pathology which ould compromise implant placement - Patients with any pathology which ould compromise implant placement as mentioned in the device instruction manual - Patients with any pathology that would limit blood supply and compromise healing - Patients with blood coagulation disorder (associated current level coagulation) - Patients with autoimmune connective tissue disease - Patients with upper urinary tract obstruction and renal insufficiency - Patients with local or systemic infection |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | CH Camille Guérin | Châtellerault Cedex | |
France | CHU de Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital Estaing | Clermont Ferrand | |
France | CH de Dunkerque | Dunkerque | |
France | CH de Gonesse | Gonesse | |
France | CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre | Lille Cedex | |
France | CHRU de Lyon - Hôpital de la Croix Rousse | Lyon Cedex 4 | |
France | APHM - Hôpital de la Conception | Marseille Cedex 5 | |
France | CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie | Montpellier | |
France | Clinique Beau Soleil | Montpellier | |
France | CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau | Nîmes Cedex 09 | |
France | CH Louis Giorgi | Orange | |
France | CHU de Poitiers | Poitiers | |
France | Hôpital Foch | Suresnes |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes |
France,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Apical anatomical success | Presence/absence: anatomical success as concerns apical (uterine) support, defined as point C <= stage 1 per POP-Q scoreing (ICS) | 12 months | |
Primary | Anterior vaginal wall anatomical success | Presence/absence: anatomical success on anterior vaginal wall support, defined as point Ba < = stage 1 per POP-Q scoring (ICS) | 12 months | |
Primary | Change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores | baseline to 12 lines | ||
Secondary | Anterior vaginal wall anatomical success | Presence/absence: anatomical success on anterior vaginal wall support, defined as point Ba < = stage 1 per POP-Q scoring (ICS) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Apical anatomical success | Presence/absence: anatomical success as concerns apical (uterine) support, defined as point C <= stage 1 per POP-Q scoreing (ICS) | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Apical anatomical success | Presence/absence: anatomical success as concerns apical (uterine) support, defined as point C <= stage 1 per POP-Q scoreing (ICS) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Anterior vaginal wall anatomical success | Presence/absence: anatomical success on anterior vaginal wall support, defined as point Ba < = stage 1 per POP-Q scoring (ICS) | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores | baseline to 6 weeks | ||
Secondary | Change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores | baseline to 6 months | ||
Secondary | Change from baseline in PFIQ-7 scores | baseline to 6 weeks | ||
Secondary | Change from baseline in PFIQ-7 scores | baseline to 6 months | ||
Secondary | Change from baseline in PFIQ-7 scores | baseline to 12 months | ||
Secondary | Change from baseline in PISQ-12 scores | baseline to 6 months | ||
Secondary | Change from baseline in PISQ-12 scores | baseline to 12 months | ||
Secondary | length of hospital stay (days) | 6 weeks | ||
Secondary | Number of days necessary for return to normal activities | 6 weeks | ||
Secondary | Visual analog scale for post-operative pain | score ranging from 0.0 to 10.0 | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Visual analog scale for post-operative pain | score ranging from 0.0 to 10.0 | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Visual analog scale for post-operative pain | score ranging from 0.0 to 10.0 | 6 months | |
Secondary | Visual analog scale for post-operative pain | score ranging from 0.0 to 10.0 | 12 months | |
Secondary | Mesh related morbidity | Presence/absence of mesh related morbidity (infection, erosion, pain, dyspareunia) | Day 1 | |
Secondary | Mesh related morbidity | Presence/absence of mesh related morbidity (infection, erosion, pain, dyspareunia) | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Mesh related morbidity | Presence/absence of mesh related morbidity (infection, erosion, pain, dyspareunia) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Mesh related morbidity | Presence/absence of mesh related morbidity (infection, erosion, pain, dyspareunia) | 12 months | |
Secondary | Mesh contraction (cm) | Mesh contraction as determined by ultrasound measurement (cm) | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Mesh contraction (cm) | Mesh contraction as determined by ultrasound measurement (cm) | 6 months | |
Secondary | Mesh contraction (cm) | Mesh contraction as determined by ultrasound measurement (cm) | 12 months | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction (PGI index) score | 6 weeks | ||
Secondary | Patient satisfaction (PGI index) score | 6 months | ||
Secondary | Patient satisfaction (PGI index) score | 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05420831 -
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05422209 -
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05493735 -
Lidocaine for Pessary Check Pain Reduction
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06126328 -
Materna Prep Study Phase II
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05542836 -
EVeRLAST 2-Year Follow-Up
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05918367 -
Multicenter Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Registry Collaborative
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04172272 -
The Influence of TAP Block in the Control of Postoperative Pain After Laparotomy for Gynecological Procedures
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04807920 -
BOTOX® at the Time of Prolapse Surgery for OAB
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06268782 -
The Effectiveness of an Online Exercise Program on Well-being of Postpartum Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02919852 -
Laparoscopic Retrovesical Colpopectinopexia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03146195 -
The 3D Reconstruction Research of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02925585 -
Vaginal Tactile Imaging for Pelvic Floor Prolapse
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02536001 -
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02113969 -
Conservative Management of Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using Vaginal Pessaries: Generation of a Standardized Management Protocol
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02383199 -
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT01673360 -
Collection of Long Term Patient Outcomes Data Following Implantation of AMS Surgical Devices
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01842464 -
Sacro-Spinous Ligaments Anterior Apical Anchoring
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01530191 -
Factors Affecting Perioperative Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01320631 -
Male Sexual Experience and Its Impact on Quality of Life Before and After Their Sexual Partners Undergo Polypropylene Mesh Augmented Pelvic Floor Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00581412 -
Composite Graft Use in Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Reduces Erosion Rates
|
N/A |