Clinical Trials Logo

Peer Review, Publishing clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Peer Review, Publishing.

Filter by:
  • Completed  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT03751878 Completed - Clinical trials for Peer Review, Publishing

Evaluating the Impact of Assessing During Peer Review the CONSORT Checklist Submitted by Authors

Start date: December 7, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Randomised trials are considered the gold standard in medical research. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement aims to improve the quality of reporting of randomised trials. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings, and therefore these findings cannot inform clinical practice. Different stakeholders, including biomedical journals, have taken different actions to try to improve author adherence to CONSORT. The most popular action among biomedical journals is to instruct authors to submit a completed RG checklist with page numbers indicating where the CONSORT items are addressed when they submit their manuscript. However, this measure alone has been proven not to be effective. In this study, the investigators intend to evaluate in a real editorial context whether assessing during peer review the consistency between the submitted CONSORT checklist and the information reported in the manuscripts of randomised trials, as well as to provide feedback to authors on the inconsistencies found, improves the completeness of reporting of published trials.