Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT02998086 |
Other study ID # |
SC-N120 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
December 5, 2016 |
Est. completion date |
December 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2021 |
Source |
Seattle Children's Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Parenting a child with cancer is highly stressful. The investigators have designed a
promising parent-centered intervention to bolster parent resilience and reduce stress and
distress. This study will test 2 formats of the intervention (individual or group-based) and
compare them to usual care.
Description:
Parenting a child with cancer is highly distressing. Both during and after cancer therapy,
parents may suffer from poor mental health, risky health behaviors, and financial hardship,
all of which may impact patients, siblings, and the family unit. Positive psychological
resources can mitigate negative outcomes. In this regard, resilience is particularly
important, describing an individual's ability to maintain psychological and/or physical
well-being in the face of stress.
The investigators have previously described the "Promoting Resilience in Stress Management"
(PRISM) intervention for adolescent and young adult patients with cancer. This brief, 1:1
intervention targets four "resilience resources" over approximately 3 months: skills in
stress-management/mindfulness, goal-setting, cognitive restructuring, and meaning-making.
Notably, every parent whose child received the PRISM requested a similar intervention for
him- or herself. Hence, the investigators adapted two versions of the intervention for
parents (the "PRISM-P"). First, using the same 1:1 format, they piloted the PRISM-P amongst
12 parents of children with cancer. Feedback was highly positive; however, many parents
requested additional group-based social support. Second, they conducted a half-day symposium
and administered small-group adaptations of the PRISM-P to 70 parents of children with
serious illness. Feedback was again positive; however, the opportunity to develop individual
skills was limited.
This application proposes a pilot Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to evaluate and compare
these 2 formats of the PRISM-P with usual care, in order to determine optimal methodologies
and preferences for future, larger studies. Consecutive eligible parents of children with
newly diagnosed cancer will be randomly assigned to one of the 3 options (N=75 total, n=25
per arm). Secondary aims will assess parent-reported stress, burden of care, hope, goals,
optimism, benefit-finding, psychological distress, and health behaviors, and ongoing
perceptions of usefulness, feasibility, and preference.