Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05791903
Other study ID # Ebkrkpln
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 3, 2023
Est. completion date June 6, 2024

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Nurses aim to care for people who can no longer carry out their life activities and needs, and to ensure that they can continue to live their lives as well as possible. The aim is to improve the quality of life by making life more comfortable through care. Comfort in care means solving the patient's problems, being peaceful and content, and relieving pain/suffering. Kolcaba explained that comfort theory can be used as a guide to meet the comfort needs of individuals in the care process. The theory explains the concept of comfort as relaxation, refreshment and the ability to overcome problems (superiority). According to this theory, the nurse identifies the comfort needs of the patient and family and plans and implements interventions to meet these needs. There are no studies in the literature that have investigated the effect of nursing care based on Kolcaba's comfort theory on the comfort, satisfaction and sleep quality of ICU patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of nursing care based on Kolcaba's Comfort Theory on the comfort, satisfaction and sleep quality of ICU patients.


Description:

The study is a randomised controlled experimental study to determine the effect of nursing care based on Kolcaba's comfort theory on comfort, care satisfaction and sleep quality of intensive care patients. Power analysis was used to determine the sample size of the study. As a result of the power analysis, it was determined that a total of 44 participants, 22 participants in each group, should be reached to achieve 80% power with an effect size of 0.87, a margin of error of 0.05% and a confidence interval of 0.95%. To increase the reliability of the study, a total of 80 participants, 40 in the intervention group and 40 in the control group, should be included in the study, taking into account data loss. In this study, the control group will receive standard care and the intervention group will receive care based on Kolcaba's comfort theory. Data will be collected using the General Comfort Scale, the Newcastle Satisfaction Scale, the Richard Campbell Sleep Scale and the Comfort Behaviours Checklist.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 80
Est. completion date June 6, 2024
Est. primary completion date July 5, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Volunteering to participate in the research, - 18 years of age or older, - Being open to communication, - Clear state of consciousness - Staying in the intensive care unit for at least 24 hours Exclusion Criteria: - The patient is taking sedative medication - Being diagnosed with a sleep disorder, - The use of sleeping pills, - Loss of hearing and/or vision - Use of a hearing aid - Dependence on mechanical ventilator - illiteracy

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Nursing Care Based on Kolcaba's Comfort Theory
Comfort-orientated care

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Van yüzüncü yil university Van

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC) Yuzuncu Yil University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary General Comfort Scale The scale, which was developed by Katharine Kolcaba in 1992 in order to determine the comfort needs of individuals, to evaluate the nursing initiatives that can provide comfort and the increase in comfort, was adapted to Turkish society by Kuguoglu and Karabacak in 2004.The scale, which is a four-point Likert-type scale with 48 items, was created by guiding the taxonomic structure consisting of the theoretical components of comfort, including 3 levels and 4 dimensions. Level; While the dimension is evaluated as relief (16 items), relief (17 items) and overcoming the problems (15 items); It is evaluated in three parts: physical (12 items), psychospritual (13 items) and socio-cultural (10 items). Negative expressions in the scale are calculated by reverse coding during the evaluation phase. While the lowest total score that can be obtained from the scale is 48, the highest total score is 192. 24 hours later
Primary Comfort Behaviors Checklist The Comfort Behaviour Checklist was developed by Katharina Kolcaba in 1989. The checklist is completed by the observer when it is not possible for the person to complete the questionnaire. The Comfort Behaviour Checklist consists of 30 behavioural indicators. In addition to these, Kolcaba suggests that if the checklist is the only tool used to measure comfort, the individual should give a numerical score for pain and comfort so that comfort can be objectively assessed. 24 hours later
Primary Richard-Campbell Sleep Scale The scale was developed by Richards et al. (1987) to assess sleep quality in intensive care units (Richards, 1987; Richards et al., 2000). The RQAS includes six items (depth of sleep, time to fall asleep, frequency of awakening, duration of wakefulness, quality of sleep and ambient noise level). The scale score is evaluated with the sum of the first five items. A score of 25 and below indicates very poor sleep, while a minimum score of 76 and above indicates very good sleep. 24 hours later
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04079543 - NPO and Patient Satisfaction in the Cath Lab N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05053958 - Using Superimposition of Intra-Oral Scan and CBCT in Single Implant Restorations in Aesthetic Zone. N/A
Completed NCT04204785 - Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions N/A
Completed NCT04774562 - The Effect of Video-Assisted Discharge Education After Total Hip Replacement Surgery N/A
Terminated NCT04604340 - Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Access for Cerebral Angiography in Adolescents N/A
Recruiting NCT04539210 - Screw-retained Maxillary Complete Denture With Electric Welded Metal Framework Versus Cast One, Patient Satisfaction Assessment. N/A
Completed NCT02924974 - Spinal Morphine in Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT01052415 - POL and Access Intervention to Reduce HIV Stigma Among Service Providers in China N/A
Recruiting NCT06044103 - Patient-controlled Sedation During Repair of Obstetric Perineal Lacerations Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05670080 - Does MI Have a Therapeutic Role in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? N/A
Completed NCT06114524 - Effect of Binaural Beats on Level of Anxiety and Toleration in Patients Undergoing Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Without Sedation N/A
Completed NCT06141122 - The Colonoscopy Booklet:Effect of a Recipe Resource on Quality of Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation and Patient Experience N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04534868 - Patient Acceptance And Satisfaction of Teledermoscopy In General Practice In a Belgian Rural Area N/A
Completed NCT04823390 - Anesthetist Controlled Versus Patient-controlled Sedation: Risks and Benefits Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05884684 - What is the Potential Impact of Reviewing Post-procedure Images With Patients Following Interventional Spine Procedures. N/A
Recruiting NCT05613439 - The Fast-track Centre for Hip and Knee Replacement Database
Recruiting NCT06451510 - Knee Osteoarthritis in the Region of Norrbotten
Completed NCT04420000 - Effects of Mindfulness Therapy in Patients With Acromegaly and Cushing N/A
Withdrawn NCT04625842 - Focus Group Interview Study on Patient Experiences and Satisfaction N/A
Recruiting NCT04842240 - Comparison of Patient Reported Outcome Measures Using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Pre Versus Sub-pectoral Implant Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.