Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03647735
Other study ID # FF-2017-265
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 22, 2017
Est. completion date May 3, 2018

Study information

Verified date August 2018
Source Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Orthopaedic surgeries involving the legs can be done under nerve block, where patients will be numb of pain at the operated site but awake during surgery. Sedation can be given to allay anxiety and provide comfort throughout the surgery. Sedation can be given by the anaesthetic doctors by using target-comtrolled infusion pump, or self-administered by patients by means of specialised machines. This study compares two method of administration of sedation, patient-controlled sedation (PCS) versus target-controlled infusion sedation (TCIS) by anaesthetic doctors, in people undergoing orthopaedic surgeries under nerve block.


Description:

Central neuraxial block (CNB) is one of the mainstays of anaesthesia methods in various disciplines particularly orthopaedic surgeries. However the state of consciousness can potentially cause patient anxiety thus sedation is often utilized as a mean to improve patient satisfaction and increase patient acceptance of CNB.

Conventionally, the anaesthesiologist administers sedatives for the patients. Propofol is the commonly used drug for sedation due to its favourable pharmacokinetic profile, which results in fast induction, easy control of depth of sedation and rapid recovery. It can be infused by using target-controlled infusion (TCI) devices where the anaesthetists titrates propofol by setting desired target plasma and effect site concentration. However it is difficult to judge precisely patient requirements for adequate patient sedation, comfort and analgesia as patients' needs differ.

Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is a valid option, initially adapted from post surgery patient-controlled analgesia. It allows patients to titrate sedative medication to their comfort and therefore present an option that addresses the needs of patients with strong desire to maintain sense of control during procedures.

This study was designed to compare total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS), complications and patient satisfaction, in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 78
Est. completion date May 3, 2018
Est. primary completion date May 3, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II.

2. Aged 18-65 years.

3. Elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB anticipated to last for 1.5 to 2 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30kg/m2

2. Unable to cooperate (eg. mental disorders, language barrier)

3. Drug abuse

4. Alcoholism (chronic daily alcohol intake greater than 75 g of pure alcohol for = 2 years, where 75g of alcohol = 5 cans of beer, 1 bottle of wine or half a pint of distilled spirit)

5. Contraindications to the study drugs

6. Pregnancy

7. Significant pulmonary or cardiovascular diseases, including obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity hypoventilation syndrome

8. Features of difficult airway

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
patient-controlled sedation
Patient-controlled propofol boluses for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under central neuraxial block

Locations

Country Name City State
Malaysia Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Cheras Kuala Lumpur

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Malaysia, 

References & Publications (3)

Ekin A, Donmez F, Taspinar V, Dikmen B. Patient-controlled sedation in orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia: a new approach in procedural sedation. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013 Sep-Oct;63(5):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2012.07.012. — View Citation

Singh T, Ravishankar M. Conscious sedation with propofol for surgeries under spinal anaesthesia: anaesthesiologist versus patient controlled. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 21:169-173, 2005.

Wahlen BM, Kilian M, Schuster F, Muellenbach R, Roewer N, Kranke P. Patient-controlled versus continuous anesthesiologist-controlled sedation using propofol during regional anesthesia in orthopedic procedures--a pilot study. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS) Total propofol requirement in both groups was calculated in mg/kg/hour. Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes
Secondary Patient satisfaction assessed by a 10-point numerical scale Assessed using a 10-point verbal numerical rating scale (1 to 10), where 1 was regarded as extremely dissatisfied and 10 extremely satisfied. Within one hour after recovery from sedation
Secondary Complications including incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, hypopnea, oxygen desaturation and over sedation Documented as Yes or No for each specified complication Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes