Evaluation of the Decision-making During Multidisciplinary Meetings for

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

Nowadays, the recommended approach for decision-making for oncology patients is based on multidisciplinary meetings (MDT). However, the quality of decision-making during MDT depends on other factors such as the quality of presentation of clinical cases, the degree of participation of different specialists.

In this study, the investigators will evaluate the decision-making during digestive oncology MDT using the validated "Metric Of Decision-Making" tool (MDT-MODe), in the national institute of oncology (Rabat, Morocco).

Clinical Trial Description

Multidisciplinary cancer meetings are a multidisciplinary discussion and decision-making process for a patient with cancer. It allows a sharing of knowledge and decision-making, taking into account the opinion of all the specialists involved in the treatment of cancer, in order to propose the best possible decision for the patient. Nevertheless, the quality of decision-making during CPR depends on other factors such as the quality of presentation of clinical cases, the degree of participation of different specialists and the dynamics of meetings.

There are several validated tools for the quantitative assessment of the decision-making mode during CPRs. The best known is the Metric Of Decision-Making (MDT-MODe). MDT-MODe is a validated tool for the observational evaluation of teamwork and the quality of decision-making during cancer CPR.

MDT-MODe is designed to encourage teams to make holistic decisions tailored to each patient and allows an observer to assess, on a case-by-case basis, in a quantitative and objective way:

The quality of the clinical information (antecedents, radiological pathologies, pathological, comorbid, psychosocial problems and patients' points of view) Contribution to decision-making in teams of key professional groups (surgeons, physicians, oncologists, nurses, health professionals, radiologists, pathologists) Taken together, these notes provide an indication of the quality of team decision-making.

In this study, the investigators will evaluate the decision-making during digestive oncology MDT using the validated "Metric Of Decision-Making" tool (MDT-MODe), in the national institute of oncology (Rabat, Morocco). ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04000802
Study type	Observational
Source	Moroccan Society of Surgery
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	May 23, 2019
Completion date	September 1, 2019

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT01799291` - Cognitive De-Biasing and the Assessment of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03886025` - Combined Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Training and Decision-making	N/A
Completed	`NCT03185715` - Oocyte Recipient's Decision in the Number of Embryos to be Transferred	N/A
Completed	`NCT05974943` - The Effect of Problem Solving and Decision Making Training Given to Nurses Managers	N/A
Terminated	`NCT05024903` - A Novel E-health Platform	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT04509063` - Investigating Public Enthusiasm for Mammography Screening in Denmark	N/A
Completed	`NCT03762239` - Effect of Air Pollution on the Cognitive Function of Adolescents	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06081842` - Strengthening Contraceptive Counseling Services: Research Protocol for a Multi-phase Complex Intervention in Pakistan and Nigeria	N/A
Completed	`NCT01190488` - Feasibility Of An Advanced Care Decision Aid Among Patients And Physicians_Matlock	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT04466865` - A Communication Tool to Assist Older Adults Facing Dialysis Choices	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT06046625` - Needs and Preferences of Patients With Head-neck Cutaneous SCC
Completed	`NCT03181841` - Effects of PF-06412562 on Value-based Decision-making in Healthy Individuals	Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT03554694` - Gut-brain Axis, Brain Function, and Behaviour.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05201534` - Interventions in Mathematics and Cognitive Skills	N/A
Completed	`NCT04034979` - Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Life-sustaining Therapies	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05173922` - "Safety in Dementia": An Online Caregiver Intervention	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT01098864` - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Prefrontal Cortex: Effects on Risky Decision Making and Temporal Discounting.	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05364801` - Impact of Anxiety on the Decision-making Processes of Anesthesiologists
Completed	`NCT06355999` - Levari Exp.20: 2D - Partial Feedback	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT05390411` - Seeking Objectivity in Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure (SOCIAL HF) Therapies Trial	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Evaluation of the Decision-making During Multidisciplinary Meetings for Digestive Cancers

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms