D1 and D2 Dopamine Receptors in Gambling and Amphetamine Reinforcement — HFDEX  

Pathological Gambling Clinical Trial

Official title: Comparative Effects of a D2 and Mixed D1-D2 Dopamine Antagonist on Gambling and Amphetamine Reinforcement in Pathological Gamblers and Healthy Controls

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

To determine if:

1. pathological gambling is similar to psychostimulant addiction as reflected by parallel roles for D1 and D2 receptors in gambling and stimulant reinforcement.

2. these parallel roles are linked with gambling pathology or if they are evident in both gamblers and controls.

Clinical Trial Description

BACKGROUND: No previous research appears to have investigated the role of dopamine (DA) D1 or D2 receptors in psychostimulant reinforcement in pathological gamblers. Effects of haloperidol vs. placebo will reveal the role of D2 and the effects of fluphenazine vs. haloperidol will reveal the role of D1 in this process.

OBJECTIVE: This study will begin to define the neurochemistry of Pathological Gambling by examining the roles of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in gambling reinforcement and psychostimulant reinforcement, and exploring genetic predictors of response to DA probes in Pathological Gambling subjects (subjects) and healthy controls.

METHODS: A double-blind, placebo controlled, counterbalanced between-within design will be employed. Each participant will attend 4 sessions with a minimum of 1 week between sessions to ensure drug washout. Responses to the slot machine will be assessed in sessions 1 and 2 (Phase I), and responses to amphetamine will be assessed in sessions 3 and 4 (Phase II). A second capsule (dummy) will be administered at expected peak levels for each antagonist on sessions 1 and 2 to standardize the procedure across sessions.

Subjective reinforcement self-report scales will be administered at key intervals throughout the study.

HYPOTHESIS: It is hypothesized that haloperidol (3-mg) will increase priming (Desire to Gamble, Gambling word salience) and pleasurable effects (e.g., Enjoyment/Liking) induced by playing a slot machine in Pathological Gambling subjects (N = 40). If gambling and stimulant reinforcement are mediated by common mechanisms, haloperidol will also increase priming and pleasurable effects of amphetamine (20-mg) in Pathological Gambling subjects.

If D1 mediates effects of haloperidol, the mixed D1-D2 antagonist, fluphenazine (fluphenazine; 3-mg) will decrease or not alter responses to the slot machine and amphetamine in Pathological Gambling subjects. If D2 deficits are linked with gambling pathology, haloperidol will not affect slot machine or amphetamine reinforcement in controls (N= 40).

If D1 deficits are linked with gambling pathology, fluphenazine will increase gambling and amphetamine reinforcement in controls, by mitigating undue D1 activation in subjects with high baseline D1 function. If D1 or D2 genes contribute to gambling or amphetamine reinforcement, genotype will predict responses to the manipulations. ;

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Diagnostic

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Gambling
• Pathological Gambling

• NCT number: NCT02203786
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: September 2009
• Completion date: September 2015