View clinical trials related to Partial-thickness Burn.
Filter by:The goal of this study is to test a new gelling fiber wound dressing with silver on patients with a partial thickness burn wound, which is infected or at risk of infection. Participants will be asked to wear the test dressing in a two weeks period(+/- 2 days) consisting of 3-4 study visits, and will have the dressing changed once pr. week at the research facility. The wound will be cleaned, assessed and photos will be uploaded to a digital software system.
The purpose of this study is to test the following hypotheses: 1. Early use of water-soluble surfactant dressing (WSD) on partial-thickness burn wounds will result in tissue salvage and reduce surgical burden. 2. Early use of WSD on partial-thickness burn wounds will result in faster healing. 3. Use of WSD on partial-thickness burn wounds will result in less painful wound care. 4. Early use of WSD on partial-thickness burn wounds will result in less infection. 5. Early use of WSD on partial-thickness burn wounds will result in lower hospital costs.
This a multi-center, open label, non-comparative, study that will evaluate the clinical safety and performance of Exufiber Ag+ and Exufiber dressings, separately, when used as intended in moderate to high exuding partial thickness burns (PTBs) through assessment of wound progression from baseline to the Subject's last clinical follow-up visit. Sixty-eight (68) eligible subjects, with moderate to high exuding partial-thickness burns, will be selected for treatment with either Exufiber Ag+ silver-coated gelling dressing, or Exufiber gelling dressing. The study will last 5 weeks, with a requirement of 5 study visits in total, including dressing changes at each study visit.
Patients with 10 to 20% Superficial partial thickness fresh flame burn will be recruited. Burn thickness will be confirmed by using Laser Doppler. After randomly allocating into two groups, one group will receive enteral supplemental albumin in the form of boiled egg along with routine diet while other group will receive only routine diet. Effect of burn healing will be noted in terms of epithelization, oedema, pain and redness and days of hospital stay
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the wound dressings currently used at our institution for partial-thickness burn wounds: PermeaDerm® (PermeaDerm, Inc., Carlsbad, California, USA) and silver impregnated foam dressing (Mepilex Ag®, Health Care, Göteborg, Sweden)
A randomized, controlled, 30-subject, within-subject trial for examining the effectiveness of KeraStat Gel, as opposed to the institutional standard of care, silver sulfadiazine, in improving cosmesis of the healed wound.
Burn injury is the result of an energy transfer that destroys the skin and adjacent tissues. Partial thickness burn wounds are painful and difficult to manage. The aim of burn treatment in partial thickness burns is to promote rapid wound healing, decrease pain, protect wound from infections, minimize scar formation and functional impairment In recent years, there are progressive development of new dressing material with a variety of option for depth adapted wound management. Many wound dressings are available for superficial and partial thickness burns. Hydrogel based wound dressing provides good biocompatibility with the skin and mucosa and promotes hydration of the wound bed. Aluminaid wound dressings is a hydrogel based wound dressing that is integrated with aluminium that was designed to reduce acute pain in the treatment of superficial and partical thickness burn injuries. Up to date, no evidence regarding integrated with aluminium sheet in hydrogel based wound dressings for the use in partial thickness burns. Therefore this trials is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Aluminaid versus Hydrogel for the treatment of partial thickness burns.
Evaluation of the SpinCare™ System in the Treatment of Partial Thickness Burns. A prospective, single arm, safety and efficacy, open labeled multi-center study
This study is designed to assess the efficacy and economics of two NPWT (negative pressure wound therapy) branded devices of wound healing outcomes. It is also designed to assess the effectiveness of negative pressure and negative pressure with continuous irrigation on multiple parameters of wound healing. It is a single-center, open-label, active controlled, parallel-group trial that aims to determine the efficacy of Quantum with simultaneous irrigation in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Specifically, eligible participants will be randomized to receive either PRO negative press therapy with simultaneous irrigation; or PRO negative pressure therapy without irrigation; or KCI Ulta negative pressure therapy. Outcomes will include rates of wound healing, time to closure, number of surgeries, length of stay, and days to heal.
The objective of this Trial is to evaluate the performance of RPh201 as a treatment for the healing of partial thickness burns. It is further postulated that deep second degree lesions will benefit from the RPh201 treatment promoting granulation and epithelialization as well as wound closure.