Partial-Onset Seizures Clinical Trial
— RESTORE1Official title:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-Group Phase 3 Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Retigabine (1200 mg/Day) Used as Adjunctive Therapy in Refractory Epilepsy Patients With Partial-Onset Seizures
Verified date | September 2011 |
Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
This Phase 3 study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of retigabine dosed at 1200 mg/day, in three equally divided doses, compared with placebo in patients with epilepsy who are receiving up to three established antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 306 |
Est. completion date | January 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | January 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosis of refractory epilepsy with simple or complex partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization - 28-day partial seizure frequency rate of four or more partial seizures over the 8-week baseline phase - Currently treated with up to three established AEDs - Vagal Nerve Stimulator may be included Exclusion Criteria: - Existing medical or psychiatric condition which could affect patient's health or compromise ability to participate in the study - Clinically significant abnormalities on physical exam, vital signs, ECG, or liver function tests - Impaired renal function (creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/minute) - Evidence of progressive central nervous disease, lesion, or encephalopathy - History of primary generalized seizures - History of clustering or flurries or status epilepticus within 12 months of study entry |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Argentina | Hospital General de Agudos "Dr. J.M. Ramos Mejia" | Capital Federal | CBA |
Argentina | Hospital General de Agudos "Dr. Teodoro Alvarez" | Capital Federal | CBA |
Argentina | Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires | Capital Federal | CBA |
Argentina | Fundacion Lennox | Cordoba | CRD |
Argentina | Hospital Privado Centro Medico de Cordoba | Cordoba | CRD |
Argentina | Sanatorio del Salvador II | Cordoba | CRD |
Brazil | Hospital das Clinicas de Ribeirao Preto -- Universidade de Sa Neurologia | Ribeirao Preto | SP |
Brazil | Hospital Universitario Prof Edgard Santos -- UFBA | Salvador | BA |
Brazil | Hospital das Clinicas da Fac de Medicina de Sao Paulo | Sao Paulo | SP |
Brazil | Hospital Sao Paulo -- Escola Paulista de Medicina -- UNIFESP | Sao Paulo | SP |
Canada | Foothills Medical Center | Calgary | Alberta |
Canada | Glenrose Rehabilitation Center | Edmonton | Alberta |
Canada | CHUM -- Hôpital Notre-Dame | Montréal | Quebec |
Canada | Health Sciences Centre | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador |
Mexico | Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara | Guadalajara | Jalisco |
Mexico | Instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia | La Fama | DF |
Mexico | Centro Medico | Mexico | DF |
Mexico | Hospital de Psiquiatria San Fernando, IMSS | Mexico | DF |
Mexico | instituto Nacional de Neurologia y Neurocirugia | Mexico, DF | |
Mexico | Hospital y Clinica OCA S.A. de C.V. | Monterrey | Nuevo Leon |
Mexico | Hospital Central Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto | San Luis Potosi | SLP |
Mexico | CIF BIOTEC, Medica Sur | Tlalpan | DF |
United States | McFarland Clinic | Ames | Iowa |
United States | Asheville Neurology Specialists | Asheville | North Carolina |
United States | Mid-Atlantic Epilepsy and Sleep Center | Bethesda | Maryland |
United States | University of Alabama -- Department of Neurology/Epilepsy Center | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | University of Virginia Comprehensive Epilepsy Program | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | The Comprehensive Epilepsy Care Center for Children and Adults | Chesterfield | Missouri |
United States | Delta Waves | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | Medical City Dallas Hospital | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Neurological Clinic of Texas | Dallas | Texas |
United States | University of Colorado Health Science Center | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania |
United States | Memorial Hermann Hospital | Houston | Texas |
United States | North Alabama Neuroscience Research Associates | Huntsville | Alabama |
United States | University of Florida -- Shands Jacksonville | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | UCSD Thornton Hospital | La Jolla | California |
United States | University of Kentucky | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Clinical Trials Inc. | Little rock | Arkansas |
United States | University of Southern California | Los Angeles | California |
United States | West Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center | Los Angeles | California |
United States | University of Miami | Miami | Florida |
United States | Meharry Medical College | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Beth Israel Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | Neurology Clinic | Northport | Alabama |
United States | Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Barrow Neurological Institute | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center | Richmond | Virginia |
United States | Lovelace Scientific Resources | Sarasota | Florida |
United States | Minnesota Epilepsy Group, P.A. | St. Paul | Minnesota |
United States | Medical University of Ohio at Toledo | Toledo | Ohio |
United States | Oregon Neurology PC | Tualatin | Oregon |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
GlaxoSmithKline | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. |
United States, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico,
JA French, MD; BW Abou-Khalil MD; RF Leroy, MD; EMT Yacubian, MD; P Shin MS,5 S Hall PhD, H Mansbach MD, and V Nohria MD7 on behalf of the RESTORE 1/Study 301 Investigators. Retigabine Efficacy and Safety Trial for Partial Onset Epilepsy (RESTORE 1): Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of retigabine 1200 mg/day as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures. [Neurology].
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change in the 28-day Total Partial Seizure (PS) Frequency From Baseline (BL) to the End of the Double-blind (DB) Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases) | 28-day total PS (PSs [also called focal seizures] are seizures limited to a specific area of the brain) frequency in the BL period = (Number [No.] of total PSs reported in the BL period divided by the No. of days of available total PS data in the BL period) x 28 days. 28-day total PS frequency in the DB period = (No. of total PSs reported in the DB period divided by the No. of days of available total PS data in the DB period) x 28 days. Percent change = ([value in the DB period minus value at BL] divided by the BL value) x 100%. Negative values indicate a reduction in seizure frequency. | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Week 1 through Week 18 | No |
Primary | Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Non-responders in the Maintenance Phase | Responders were participants with at least a 50% reduction in the 28-day total partial seizure frequency in the Maintenance Phase as compared to the Baseline period. | Week 7 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Were Responders and Non-responders in the DB Phase | Responders were participants with at least a 50% reduction in the 28-day total partial seizure frequency in the DB Phase as compared to the Baseline period. Participants without any post-baseline data were considered non-responders. | Week 1 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline (BL) in the 28-day Total Partial Seizure Frequency During the Maintenance Phase | 28-day total partial seizure frequency in the BL period = (No. of total partial seizures reported in the BL period divided by the No. of days of available total partial seizure data in the BL period) x 28 days. 28-day total partial seizure frequency in the Maintenance Phase = (No. of total partial seizures reported in the Maintenance Phase divided by the No. of days of available total partial seizure data in the same phase) x 28 days. Percent change = (value in the Maintenance Phase minus value at BL divided by the BL value) x 100%. Negative values indicate a reduction in seizure frequency. | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Week 7 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With a Reduction in the 28-day Total Partial Seizure Frequency From Baseline to the End of DB Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases) by Indicated Quartile Reduction Categories | Participants who experienced a reduction from Baseline in the 28-day total partial seizure frequency were categorized as having a reduction of 75-100%, 50-<75%, 25-<50%, or <25%, in addition to having no reduction. This quartile cutting was specified in the study protocol. Participants without any post-baseline data were included in the "No reduction" category. | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Week 1 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With a Reduction in the 28-day Total Partial Seizure Frequency From Baseline to the End of the DB Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases) by Indicated Decile Reduction and Increase Categories | Participants who experienced a reduction from Baseline in the 28-day total partial seizure frequency were categorized in decile cutting, i.e., reduction categories of 90-100%, 80-<90%, 70-<80%, 60-<70%, 50-<60%, 40-<50%, 30-<40%, 20-<30%, 10-<20%, >0-<10%, and increase categories of 0-10%, >10-20%, >20-30%, >30% (FDA endpoint). Participants without any post-baseline data were included in the 0-10% increase category. | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Week 1 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reduction From Baseline in the 28-day Total Partial Seizure Frequency During the Maintenance Phase | Participants who experienced a reduction from Baseline in the 28-day total partial seizure frequency were categorized as having a >75%, a 50-75%, or a <50% reduction, in addition to having no reduction (EMEA endpoint). | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Week 7 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Experienced the Indicated Level of Exacerbation and Reduction in the 28-day Total Partial Seizure Frequency From Baseline During the Maintenance Phase | Participants who experienced an exacerbation from Baseline in the 28-day total partial seizure frequency were categorized as having a 0-25% or a >25% increase (EMEA endpoint). The number of participants experiencing a >0% reduction from Baseline in the 28-day total partial seizure frequency are also presented. | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Week 7 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Reporting New Seizure Types in the Indicated Categories During the DB Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases) That Were Not Reported at Baseline | New seizure types included those seizures which were not reported by any participant at Baseline. | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Week 1 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Were Seizure-free During the DB Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases) | Participants were considered to be seizure-free if they had not reported any seizures during the DB treatment period (Weeks 1-18). For a participant to be seizure free during the DB Phase, the participant had to be seizure free both Week 7 to Week 18 and Week 1 to Week 6. A participant could be seizure free Week 7 to Week 18 (during the Maintenance Phase), but not seizure free Week 1 to Week 6. Hence, there are fewer participants being reported as seizure free from Week 1 to Week 18 than from Week 7 to Week 18. | Week 1 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Were Seizure-free During the Maintenance Phase | Participants were considered to be seizure-free if they had not reported any seizures during the Maintenance Phase. | Week 7 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Seizure-free Days During the DB Phase (Titration and Maintenance Phases) | A seizure-free day was a day without any seizures. For a participant to be seizure free during the DB Phase, the participant had to be seizure free both Week 7 to Week 18 and Week 1 to Week 6. A participant could be seizure free Week 7 to Week 18 (during the Maintenance Phase), but not seizure free Week 1 to Week 6. Hence, there are fewer participants being reported as seizure free from Week 1 to Week 18 than from Week 7 to Week 18. The percentage of seizure-free days was calculated as the total number of days without seizures in the DB period divided by the number of days in DB period x 100%. | Week 1 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Seizure-free Days During the Maintenance Phase | A seizure-free day was a day without any seizures. The percentage of seizure-free days was calculated as the total number of days without seizures in the DB period divided by the number of days in the DB period x 100%. | Week 7 through Week 18 | No |
Secondary | Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at the End of the Maintenance Phase | Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the treatment. Scores on the scale are rated as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. | Week 18/end of treatment phase | No |
Secondary | Patient Global Impression (PGI) Score at the End of the Maintenance Phase | PGI is a participant-rated scale of improvement that was administered at the end of the Maintenance Phase in order to assess the participant's impression of his or her own improvement. PGI assessments were scored using a 7-point scale: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; or 7, very much worse. | Week 18/end of treatment phase | No |
Secondary | Quality of Life (QOL) Assessed by QOL in Epilepsy-Problems Questionnaire (QOLIE-31-P) at Baseline (Week 0) and Weeks 6, 10, and 18 | The QOLIE-31-P is a 31-item questionnaire evaluating a participant's QOL perception in 7 domains: seizure worry, emotional well being, energy/fatigue, cognitive functioning, medication effects, social functioning, overall QOL. Precoded numeric values for some domains are such that a higher number reflects a more favorable health state; others are such that a higher number reflects a less favorable state. Precoded values are first converted to 0-100 point scores; higher converted scores always reflect better QOL. The overall score is derived by weighting and then summing the 7 domain scores. | End of Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 6, 10, and 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Whose Clinical Laboratory Values Were Deemed an Adverse Event by the Investigator (>=2% in Any Treatment Arm) | Clinically important changes in laboratory values were to be reported as an adverse event if they met one of the following criteria: (1) intervention required; (2) change in dose of study drug required; (3) other treatment/therapy required; (4) association with other diagnoses. | Week 1 through Week 24 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Reported the Indicated Renal and Urinary Disorder Adverse Events at a Frequency Threshold of 2% (in Any Treatment Arm) | A summary of the adverse events classified as renal or urinary disorders and in which at least 2% (rounded to an integer) of participants in any treatment arm reported during the study is presented. | Week 1 through Week 24 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Post-void Residual Urine Volume at Weeks 10 and 18 of the DB Treatment Phase | Post-void residual (PVR) urine refers to the amount of urine remaining in the bladder after normal urination. To investigate the possible effects of retigabine on bladder function, all participants underwent post-void residual bladder ultrasound at Baseline and during the Maintenance Phase. The PVR bladder ultrasound was performed by a urologist, a qualified ultrasound technician, or a qualified study nurse who was certified to do PVR bladder ultrasound. Change from Baseline in PVR residual volume was calculated as the values at Week 10 and Week 18 minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Week -7 through Week 0), Weeks 10 and 18 | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With a >=7% Increase in Body Weight During Weeks 2, 4, and 6 of theTitration Phase and Weeks 7, 8, 10, 14, and 18 of the Maintenance Phase | The number of participants with recorded weight gain of >=7% over their baseline weight was measured. | Weeks 2, 4, 6 of Titration Phase and Weeks 7, 8, 10, 14, and 18 of Maintenance Phase | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04015141 -
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Pediatric Participants With Childhood Epilepsy
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01618695 -
A Study With an Open-label Extension Phase to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Perampanel (E2007) Administered as an Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Refractory Partial-onset Seizures
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01832038 -
Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Long-term Adjunctive Therapy With Lacosamide in Adults With Partial-onset Seizures
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02192814 -
Open-label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of iv Lacosamide in Japanese Adults With Partial-onset Seizures
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00235755 -
Retigabine Efficacy and Safety Trial for Partial Onset Refractory Seizures in Epilepsy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02736162 -
Study to Investigate Dosage, Efficacy, and Safety of Perampanel Given as Monotherapy in Patients With Epilepsy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02124564 -
A Trial to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Tolerability of Lacosamide Taken as Monotherapy in Adults With Partial-onset Seizures
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04230044 -
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Fycompa® (Perampanel) as Add-on Therapy in Participants With Epilepsy
|