Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare one material called "Mucograft" with another material called "Dynamatrix." These materials are used as a type of a barrier (made from pig material also known as porcine material) in a preservation technique to increase the thickness and width of tissues at a tooth extraction site. The investigators want to see if one works better than the other or if they work equally as well. These materials are made up of collagens, which are naturally occurring proteins found in the skin, specifically connective tissue. Dynamatrix is made up of many types of collagens whereas Mucograft is only made of fewer collagens. These materials have been given something called a 510(k) status by the FDA. This means that the FDA determines them to be equivalent to another product that they have previously approved. You will be put into one of two groups at random, and will not know which one you are in. Like flipping a coin, you will have a 50/50 chance to be in either one of the two groups. You will either be in a group using Mucograft or in a group using Dynamatrix. Both of these materials are regularly used in the dental clinics.


Clinical Trial Description

A) Aim/Hypothesis/Objective The objective of this study is to compare two different membranes, Mucograft and Dynamatrix, clinically, radiographically, and histologically when used for the ridge preservation procedure in combination with bone allograft at the extraction site in terms of soft and hard tissue remodeling after 4 months healing period.

Hypothesis

1. MucograftTM will exhibit greater increase or preservation of the thickness and width of keratinized tissue than DynamatrixTM at the extraction site.

2. MucograftTM will exhibit greater preservation of the alveolar bone width and height than DynamatrixTM at the extraction site.

3. MucograftTM will exhibit greater preservation of the soft and hard tissue height than DynamatrixTM at the adjacent teeth.

4. MucograftTM will exhibit a better outcome than DynamatrixTM in the histological and histomorphometric results of the soft and hard tissue healing.

Specific Aims

1. Primary aim The primary aim is to compare MucograftTM when used as a barrier membrane in the ridge preservation technique to increase or preserve the thickness and width of keratinized tissue at the extraction site in comparison to DynamatrixTM.

2. Secondary aims

The secondary aims are to compare clinically, radiographically, and histologically MucograftTM with DynamatrixTM in relation to:

1. Changes of the alveolar bone height and width at the extraction site.

2. Changes of the soft and hard tissues at the adjacent teeth.

3. Histological and histomorphometric assessment of the soft and hard tissue healing at the extraction site. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT01808794
Study type Interventional
Source Tufts University
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date January 2013
Completion date January 2016

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT00713206 - Prospective Study of NanoTite Implants Placed Into Fresh Sinus-Lift Augmentation Sites (VSSL) N/A
Completed NCT03283241 - Zolidd One ExHex Dental Implant Compared to Uncoated One ExHex Dental Implant in Subjects With Partial Edentulism N/A
Completed NCT00728884 - Study of Certain Prevail Implants Used to Treat All Types of Edentulism in the Maxilla and Mandible
Completed NCT01529775 - Randomized Study of Osseotite Certain Tapered Prevails vs. Osseotite Certain Tapered N/A
Completed NCT03934853 - Study to Confirm Accuracy and Safety of the Inliant Surgical Navigation System N/A
Completed NCT03769376 - Histologic Comparison of Healing After Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Two Different Xenografts N/A
Completed NCT01953991 - OHQoL With Removable Partial Dentures; a Pilot Study N/A
Completed NCT02387970 - Immediate or Delayed Provisionalization in Posterior Healed Sites N/A
Completed NCT02158377 - TM vs TSV Implants Loaded Early vs Conventional in Anterior and Posterior Areas N/A
Completed NCT01324778 - Multi Centre Study Comparing OsseoSpeed TX With OsseoSpeed N/A
Terminated NCT02188212 - Nobel Procera Crown Shaded Zirconia and NobelProceraTM Full Contour Crown IPS e.Max CAD N/A
Completed NCT00728962 - A Study of Osseotite Certain Prevail Implants Used to Support Short Fixed Bridges With Immediate Occlusal Loading.
Completed NCT00728754 - A Study of Certain Prevail Implants Used for the Preservation of Crestal Bone in Short Fixed Bridge Cases. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03558347 - CF41102 5-year Clinical Evaluation of Conelog® Implant With 7 mm Length N/A
Withdrawn NCT02590861 - Improving Oral Health Function With Implant Supported Partial Dentures N/A
Completed NCT02507661 - Effect of Alveolar Ridge Preservation on Implant Esthetic Outcomes Phase 4
Completed NCT02703168 - Long-term Performance of SLActive Implants After Immediate or Early Loading N/A
Completed NCT02404649 - Comparing Conventional Dental Implants and Trabecular Metalâ„¢ Dental Implants After Sinus Floor Elevation N/A
Completed NCT01529814 - Assessment of Integration Success of an Implant System With a Novel Abutment Attachment Design in Early Loaded Cases N/A
Completed NCT00782171 - Evaluation of Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Dental Implants With a Modified Surface Phase 4