View clinical trials related to Partial Edentulism.
Filter by:This prospective, randomized study will evaluate the performance of the Osseotite Certain Prevail implant when compared to that of the non-lateralized version of the implant. Study (null) hypothesis: the crestal bone changes that take place after placement and loading of the Osseotite lateralized implants will be the same as for a similar but non-lateralized Osseotite Certain implant.
This study will evaluate the contributions of the Nanotite implant design when used by graduate students in their first year of placing implants.
This prospective randomized study will evaluate the integration success while supporting a prosthesis for short implants placed into maxillary sites having minimal bone height that would otherwise need sinus augmentation. The resources utilized during treatment will be assessed. Study (null) hypothesis: the overall benefit of using short length implants to avoid sinus augmentation procedures will offset differences in the cumulative implant survival rates observed between treatment groups.
This prospective, randomized study evaluates the performance and crestal bone changes difference between the Osseotite Certain Prevail vs the non-lateralized design of the implant. Study (null) hypothesis: the crestal bone changes that take place after placement and loading of the Osseotite lateralized implants will be the same as for similar but non-lateralized Osseotite Certain implants.
This prospective, randomized-controlled, clinical study evaluates the ability of the NanoTite implant system to achieve integration and provide long-term support of a prosthesis when placed immediately in fresh sinus augmentation material. Control cases will be those where the sinus augmentation material is allowed four months of healing prior to NanoTite implant placement. In addition to implant performance, radiographic evidence of crestal bone regressive modeling will be used to evaluate differences between test and control cases. Study (null) hypothesis: The implants placed into sinus augmentation sites at the time of grafting will have the same integration success and maintenance of integration as for the implants placed after four months of graft healing.
Objectives: The purpose of this research was to determine the clinical success rate of a lithia-disilicate-based core ceramic (Ivoclar, Vivadent Corp.) for use in posterior fixed partial dentures (FPDs) as a function of bite force, cement type, connector height, and connector width. Methods: Thirty ceramic FPD core frameworks were prepared using a hot-pressing technique and a lithia-disilicate-based core ceramic. The maximum clenching force was measured for each patient prior to tooth preparation. Connector heights and widths were measured for each FPD. Patients were recalled yearly after cementation for two years and evaluated using eleven clinical criteria. All FPDs were examined by two independent clinicians and rankings for each criterion were made from 1 to 4 with 4 = excellent and 1 = unacceptable. The aims of this research were: 1. To test the hypotheses that three-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs) of a high-strength core ceramic will exhibit good-to-excellent clinical performance (based on 11 evaluative criteria) and that they will adequately resist fracture in posterior situations (excluding third molars) if fabricated with the minimal connector size (4 mm x 4 mm). 2. To test the hypothesis that a reinforced glass ionomer cement (ProTec CEM, Ivoclar, Vivadent), when used to cement core ceramic crowns in posterior FPDs, will be associated with significantly less marginal quality, but similar fracture resistance of the ceramic crowns compared with the marginal quality associated with a dual cure resin cement (Variolink® II, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein). 3. To test the hypothesis that there is no significant difference in tooth sensitivity associated with FPDs cemented with the glass ionomer cement and dual-cure resin cement.