View clinical trials related to Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:This study is expected to include 166 subjects and Conducted at 11 research centers；The expected 12 month treatment success rate of using research instruments is 65%. Principle evaluation indexes： 1. Immediate success rate of surgery Immediately success of the surgery: complete pulmonary vein electrical isolation was achieved after ablation. 2. Immediate success rate of surgery=number of patients with immediate success of surgery/number of cases in subjects × 100% 3. Treatment success rate at 12 months after surgery Treatment success: Between 3 months and 12 months after ablation, there were no episodes of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia (duration ≥ 30 seconds, with clear electrocardiogram confirmation) without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Treatment success rate=number of successful cases of postoperative treatment in subjects/number of cases in subjects × 100% Secondary evaluation indexes： 1. The occurrence of hospitalization or emergency treatment due to symptoms caused by atrial arrhythmias during follow-up at 6 and 12 months after surgery; 2. Device performance evaluation; Safety evaluation indexes： 1. The occurrence of death, stroke, or transient ischemic attack; 2. The occurrence of surgical related complications, such as vascular puncture complications (pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, etc.), heart perforation, atrial esophageal fistula, phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis (symptomatic), etc; 3. Clinically significant vital signs and related examinations; 4. The occurrence of other adverse events and serious adverse events during the trial period.
The purpose of this study is to verify the safety and efficacy of the cardiac pulse ablation system in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to provide the basis for product registration and clinical application. The trial will be conducted at a clinical center with appropriate clinical cases, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation procedures will be performed by an authorized investigator using the trial product. The effectiveness and safety of the cardiac pulse ablation system in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will be verified by collecting the treatment success rate, immediate ablation success rate, procedure time and device use evaluation within 12 months after the procedure.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel method, pulse-field ablation (PFA) using the FARAPULSE catheter, has recently been introduced (FARAPULSE PFA, Boston Scientific). However, whether FARAPULSE PFA provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that FARAPULSE PFA has shown in studies not to cause any of the severe complications reported in association with traditional PVI while being highly effective, it might be even safer and more effective for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of PVI using FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for PVI and the FARAPULSE PFA is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The null hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the FARAPULSE PFA (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence, the alternative hypothesis postulates that the FARAPULSE PFA is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.
The real world study is a retrospective and/or prospective, single-center, single-arm observational study to observe the safety and effectiveness of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System for treatment of recurrent, symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF) in a Chinese population.
This is a post-market study collecting real-world clinical data on safety, effectiveness and procedural success of Boston Scientific Cardiac Cryoablation System (POLARx™ System)
The Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up trial is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, single-arm clinical follow-up study designed to provide long-term safety feasibility, effectiveness and performance of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System for the treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF).
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Single shot devices are increasingly used for PVI. Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel cryoballoon technology has recently been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific). However, whether PolarX provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that PolarX was developed considering the reported limitations and potential failures associated with the Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon, it might be even more effective and safe for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for single shot PVI and the PolarX is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence the alternative hypothesis postulates that the PolarX Cryoballoon is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.
This is a prospective, adaptive, multi-center, randomized safety and effectiveness pivotal study comparing the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System with standard of care ablation with force-sensing RF catheters and cryoballoon catheters indicated for the treatment of PAF.
A single-center, real word study of consecutive subjects who undergo radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal AF using THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH®SF (STSF) Catheter guiding by Ablation Index (AI). Prospectively or retrospectively record 150 eligible subjects since 1st Jan 2019 to evaluate effectiveness and safety of STSF with AI.
To obtain data for the Rhythmia™ Mapping System in conjunction with Boston Scientific Open-Irrigated (OI) Catheters for ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF) according to current international and local guidelines. Primary objective: To assess acute and long-term outcomes for the Rhythmia Mapping System in conjunction with Boston Scientific Open-Irrigated Ablation Catheters to treat de novo Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. De Novo PAF is defined as subjects undergoing first ablation procedure for PAF with no prior left atrial ablation (RF, Cryo, Surgical).