Laparascopic Keyhole vs Sugarbaker Repair in Parastomal Hernia

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a non-randomised case-controlled prospective study of consecutive patients with parastomal hernia, comparing the laparoscopic Keyhole repair with the modified Sugarbaker repair.

Clinical Trial Description

Objective: To compare the laparoscopic Keyhole repair with the modified Sugarbaker repair in a nonrandomised case-controlled prospective study of consecutive patients with parastomal hernia.

Summary Background Data: Two reviews of uncontrolled studies concluded that the Sugarbaker repair is superior to the Keyhole repair. The present study challenges the claim.

Methods: In two time periods 135 patients with a parastomal hernia were repaired with the Keyhole technique (74 patients, using a two-layer mesh of polypropylene and ePTFE with a self-cut slit, 1997- 2009) or the Sugarbaker technique (61 patients, using a coated polypropylene mesh, 2009-2015). The patients in the two groups matched with regard to age, gender, ASA score, colostomy or ileostomy hernia, previous repairs, size of fascial defect and simultaneous repair of a concurrent incisional hernia. Observation time was defined as time to recurrence, stoma re-siting, mesh removal, death, or last non-event visit ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT04187235
Study type	Observational
Source	Aalborg University Hospital
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase
Start date	January 1, 1997
Completion date	December 30, 2015

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Terminated	`NCT05514600` - Fascial Defect Closure for Minimally Invasive Parastomal Hernia Repair	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04311333` - Endostomal Three-dimensional Ultrasonography for Parastomal Hernia	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06077318` - Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia
Completed	`NCT01380860` - Primary Prevention of Peristomial Hernias Via Parietal Prostheses	N/A
Completed	`NCT00908661` - Effectiveness of a Lightweight Mesh in the Laparoscopic Prevention of Parastomal Hernia	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04282473` - Peristomal Hernia Rate 5 Years After a Terminal Colostomy With the Parietex ™ TCM Parietal Prosthesis Versus Without Mesh
Completed	`NCT03792243` - Outcomes After Parastomal Hernia Repair
Recruiting	`NCT01955278` - Role of Prosthetic Mesh in Preventing Parastomal Hernias	Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT00641342` - Prevention of Parastomal Hernia by Primary Mesh Insertion	Phase 2/Phase 3
Terminated	`NCT04966065` - Evaluation of the Parietex TM Parastomal No Hole Mesh for Repair of Parastomal Hernias in End-colostomies
Recruiting	`NCT04440514` - Endoscopic Preperitoneal Parastomal Hernia Repair (ePauli Repair)
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04950140` - Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Parastomal Hernia of the Oncology Patient	N/A
Terminated	`NCT02489175` - Stomaplasty Ring (KoringTM) for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03667287` - Stoma Hernia Intraperitoneal Full-Thickness Skin	N/A
Completed	`NCT01722565` - Prospective Study of the Use of a Mesh to Prevent Parastomal Hernia After Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02368873` - the Use of a IPOM Mesh for Prevention of Parastomal Hernia	N/A
Completed	`NCT02233465` - Treating Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00917995` - Trial Concerning the Frequency of Parastomal Hernia With or Without a Mesh	Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed	`NCT01484743` - Risk Factors for Morbidity After Parastomal Hernia Repair
Completed	`NCT00509054` - Prevention of Parastomal Hernia With a Mesh	Phase 4