Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05573399 |
Other study ID # |
ChanghaiH-PP11 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 1, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
October 2022 |
Source |
Changhai Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study intends to retrospectively analyze the patients who underwent
pancreatoduodenectomy and compare the safety and feasibility between early enteral nutrition
through nasojejunal tube and early oral feeding after pancreatoduodenectomy. This study is
expected to revise the guidelines for early nutritional support after
pancreaticoduodenectomy, reduce postoperative complications, and provide better guidance for
clinical work.
Description:
Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the standard treatment for periampullary and pancreatic head
carcinomas, with the high incidence of perioperative complications ranging from 40% to 60%.
Malnutrition is a relevant predictor of post-operative morbidity and mortality after
pancreatic surgery. Adequate nutrition is the key to reduce perioperative complications,
including abdominal infection, poor healing of wounds, and even gastrointestinal anastomotic
leak. The optimal nutritional support method after Pancreaticoduodenectomy is still
uncertain, and the current nutritional support methods are diverse. The results of an
international survey showed that there was very poor or no agreement on postoperative
strategies for the management of nutrition after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Therefore, the
investigators designed this retrospective study to evaluate which was safer and more feasible
between early oral feeding and nasojejunal early enteral nutrition after
Pancreaticoduodenectomy, using the method of propensity score weighting.