View clinical trials related to Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing.
Filter by:The LPN procedure is performed under general anesthesia. The transperitoneal access to peripancreatic space is via the gastro-colic ligament and greater omentum, effusion and pus is removed by laparoscopic forceps and suction. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is performed during the LPN procedure on patients with indication. The NPN procedure is followed by the standard retroperitoneal approach. After the catheter is exchanged over a guide wire and serially dilated up from 6F to 24F followed by Seldinger technique, the access track to the necrotic cavity is established. A nephroscope is inserted into the cavity through the track for debridement. Using forceps and suction, the peripancreatic solid necrotic tissue and pus is grasped and removed. A large-bore irrigating drain is left in the cavity, with continuous irrigation by warm normal saline solution at a rate of 100-125 ml/h after surgery.
The infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) should be treated by debridement and drainage. In recent years, the results of clinical research show that minimally invasive debridement such as video-assisted (laparoscope, nephroscope, endoscopy, etc.) and total laparoscopic debridement can significantly improve the prognosis of IPN patients. After a long period of clinical practice, laparoscope-assisted debridement was selected as the main surgical method in our center. In many large-scale clinical studies, patients after surgery underwent necrotic cavity lavage (such as small omental sac lavage, retroperitoneal space lavage, peripancreatic lavage, etc.), but its necessity and clinical significance were not clearly stated in the guidelines. At present, the clinical research mainly focuses on the improvement of minimally invasive debridement, and less on the necessity of lavage. In the past, necrotic cavity lavage was performed in IPN patients, but long-term clinical observation showed that lavage may lead to spread of infection and increase the incidence of lower extremity venous thrombosis which is not accorded with ERAS(Enhanced Recovery After Surgery). Therefore, since 2012, our center has stopped necrotic cavity lavage for IPN patients after debridement. We retrospectively analyzed the therapeutic effect from February 2014 to August 2017 and found that even without necrotic cavity lavage, better therapeutic effect could be achieved. Meanwhile it can simplify the operation process and avoid infection spread. This treatment method provides a new idea. However, it is a retrospective study not a randomized controlled trials(RCT) which is low effectiveness of proof. Therefore, we design this RCT to verify the necessity of necrotic cavity lavage after laparoscope-assisted debridement for patients with infected pancreatic necrosis.
This trial is to compare clinical outcomes between patients undergoing immediate endoscopic necrosectomy compared to step-up endoscopic interventions in patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis.
While the majority of patients with acute pancreatitis suffer a mild and uncomplicated course of disease, up to 20% develop a more severe course with development of pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necroses. With time, these necroses become encapsulated with a well-defined inflammatory wall, so called walled-off necroses (WON). Up to 30% of WONs become infected, which prolongs the length of hospital stay, increases morbidity and mortality significantly, and generally requires an invasive intervention. During the last decade, minimally invasive therapies consisting of percutaneous and endoscopic, transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by percutaneous or endoscopic necrosectomy, have replaced open surgery as the standard treatment resulting in better patient outcomes. The investigators have for nearly two decades been practicing an endoscopic step-up approach as standard treatment for infected WON. Recently, lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been introduced for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections. The stent is fully-covered and shaped with two bilateral anchor flanges with a saddle in between. A dedicated through-the-scope delivery system, where the tip serves as an electro cautery device enables extra-luminal access and deployment of the stent. Initial results from primarily retrospective case series were promising. However, a recent randomized controlled trial failed to demonstrate superiority in terms of number of necrosectomies needed, treatment success, clinical adverse events, readmissions, length of hospital stay (LOS), and overall treatment costs. Furthermore, a number of serious adverse events with development of pseudoaneurisms probably due to collapse of the cavity have led to alterations in treatment with sequential computed tomography (CT) scans and insertion of double pigtail stents within the metal stent. In that trial, the mean diameter of the treated necroses was limited and in addition, the study was launched before the introduction of a novel 20 mm in diameter LAMS. The investigators hypothesize, that use of a 20 mm LAMS in large caliber WON is superior to the standard double pigtail technique. Aim To compare the use of a novel 20 mm lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) (Hot Axios, Boston Scientific) with a conventional double pigtail technique for endoscopic transluminal drainage of large (> 15 cm) pancreatic and/or peripancreatic walled-of necrosis (WON).
The open abdomen can occur as a result of various diseases. After infections of the abdomen, compartment syndromes or traumata, it is essential for survival (1). This condition of the open abdomen lasts from days to months. Within a very short time, the fascia and abdominal wall structures retract in such a way that direct abdominal closure is often impossible. In addition, there is a pronounced intraabdominal oedema, which additionally increases the space required by the abdominal organs. Therefore, it is clinically indispensable to increase the space of the intraabdominal organs in this life-threatening situation. After the laparotomy (opening of the abdomen) has been performed, it is therefore not closed. However, the natural traction on the abdominal wall, in particular on the fascia, the attached musculature as well as skin and subcutis, no longer exists in this situation. As a result, these structures retract over the period of the existing laparostoma. In the present study, the CE-certified medical device Fasciotens Abdomen will be used to prove the functionality of this device and the user feasibility. The basic principle of Fasciotens Abdomen is the ventrally directed pulling force on the two fascial edges via an external device with support on the thorax and pelvis. The possibility to apply a traction to the fascia from the moment of opening the abdomen without reducing the intraabdominal space is absolutely new and the rationale of this technique. The objective of this study is to prove the obvious prevention of fascial retraction through the Fasciotens Abdomen device.
A prospective randomized cohort study to compare whether the placement of a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPS) within a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) may improve the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided transmural drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) and thus prevent potential adverse events related to LAMS insertion.
A prospective, single arm, open label, multi-center, trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Interscope EndoRotor® Resection System in subjects requiring direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) with walled off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN).
With the development of endoscopic technology, ERCP has been widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatobiliary diseases, and has become the first treatment for most of the biliary and pancreatic diseases. Postoperative ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication after ERCP. The purpose of this study was to explore methods for preventing postoperative pancreatitis. 1. Participants: Patients with high-risk factors associated with PEP were included in the no-obvious patients who underwent therapeutic ERCP in our hospital from June 2018 to December 2019. 2. Research methods: Patients were randomly divided into indometacin suppositories, indomethacin suppositories and pancreatic stents. 3. Statistical methods: SPSS 13.0 statistical software was used. The measurement data was expressed as x± s, and t-test or non-parametric test was used. Chi-square test was used for count data.
To demonstrate safety and effectiveness of lumen-apposing metal stents for resolution of walled off pancreatic necrosis (WONs) in patients with WONs with solid component >30%.
Walled of necrosis (WON) is severe local complication of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome(DPDS) is commonly seen (50-60%) after necrotizing pancreatitis and has long term implication like recurrent pancreatic fluid collections (PFC)] requiring re-intervention. Incidence of recurrent PFC is more common in patients with DPDS (17-50%) compared to others. Studies has shown permanent in-dwelling transmural stent reduces recurrence of PFC (1.7% vs 17.4%, p<0.001). Nowadays,WON is effectively managed with endoscopic step up approach (96%). Several studies showed dedicated self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) are effective compared to the plastic stents in management of WON with decreased need of re-intervention. However, SEMS cannot be kept for longer duration because of associated adverse events. So, experts recommend to remove SEMS within 4-6 weeks of placement. Considering this background, study is planned with aim to see the effect of transmural plastic stenting on recurrence of PFC after SEMS removal in walled off necrosis with DPDS.