Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05508828
Other study ID # DRUMPCILAMS
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date January 1, 2019
Est. completion date August 14, 2022

Study information

Verified date January 2019
Source Chinese Medical Association
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is the most severe form of acute pancreatitis (AP) and Infection of pancreatic necrosis (IPN) have shown to be one of the decisive factors defining the severity of illness. Minimally invasive techniques including endoscopy, laparoscopy, retroperitoneal approaches, etc., have recently been widely used for debridement because the procedure can further reduces surgical stress and performed not require general anesthesia, thereby reducing complications. Studies have shown that endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy can significantly reduced the proinflammatory response, complications, and hospital stay. Despite these advantages, there are some limitations with this approach. First, transgastric necrosectomy should be performed as late (about 4 weeks) in the course of the disease as possible to allow necrosis to wrap, since early debridement may result in a higher patient fatality rate. However, patients with SAP are often in a severely ill state due to sepsis or MODS at an early stage, which causes them unable to adhere to necrotic tissue encapsulation by conservative treatment. Second, the ideal patient to select for this approach has necrosis confined in the vicinity of gastroduodenal location. Last, up to 27% of IPN patients require additional percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) after undergoing endoscopic transluminal therapy. This may be explained by the fact that dissemination of necrosis, digestive enzymes and inflammatory mediators from the necrotic tissue lumen to other parts of the abdominal cavity during endoscopic procedures. Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) has always been the principal treatment measure for patients with AP at early stage (< 4 weeks) or those with collections or necrosis extending into deeper anatomical planes. Irrigation through peripancreatic drainage placed after open laparotomy has been the standard treatment for patients with AP who had undergone surgical necrosectomy. However, this proactive approach has not been widely used in the setting of PCD. To adequate drainage and removal of necrosis, an early percutaneous continuous irrigation assisted vacuum drainage in combination with subsequent endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy which has not been reported so far was applied in critically ill patients with SAP.


Description:

Severe Acute Pancreatitis (SAP) Treatment Protocol After admission, patients were given intravenous analgetics, omeprazole and somatostatin, and nasojejunal tubes were placed for EN. Once fever developed, broad-spectrum antibiotics were given empirically. If the patient was concomitant with shock, respiratory failure, and acute kidney injury, appropriate organ support was provided. Patients with biliary pancreatitis was given encoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreato graphy (ERCP) within 24 h after admission. When the patient was diagnosed with hyperlipidemic pancreatitis and plasma triglyceride ≥11.3 mmol/L, plasma exchange was administered immediately. All patients were given contrast enhanced CT within 48 hours after admission to identify the location and range of the necrosis and calculate the CT severity index (CISI). Procedure All PCD and endoscopic procedures were performed under conscious sedation or local anesthesia. If the patient's condition progressively worsened, a multifunctional irrigation-assisted vacuum drainage tube was placed by the CT-guided Seldinger technique in each of the necrosis cavity. The tube was administered with continuous internal irrigation and vacuum drainage as described in below: (1) the end of the drainage tube (the adapter) was connected to a vacuum device that delivers a controlled negative pressure within the range of 8-10 kPa. (2) a large volume of 0.9% normal saline was infused into the necrosis cavity constantly (1500mL a day, 65mL an hour) through the durg entrance, allowing for continuous irrigation; (3) the inside drainage tube was flush by rapid manual injection of 50-100 mL 0.9% normal saline twice a day through the drug entrance and inject 20-50 mL of 0.9% normal saline daily through water entrance to prevent the tube from becoming blocked by necrosis, debris or omentum; (4) total irrigation and drainage volume were checked every 8 hours to keep the irrigation-drainage balanced. All tubes were checked daily and replaced when the tube was translocated or blocked. When the volume of irrigation exceeds the drainage 500 mL/day or if there were serious complications associated with the drainage tube, continuous irrigation and vacuum drainage should be stopped immediately and the tube was the traditional drainage was performed. Approximately 4 weeks after disease onset or the formation of well-defined wall was confirmed by repeat CT scan, transgastric necrosectomy were performed by one or two experienced endoscopist under conscious sedation. Transgastric necrosectomy was repeated, mostly every three to five days, until all loosely adherent necrotic material were cleared and replaced by granulation tissue. In the course of the procedure, antibiotic administration was adjusted based on the results of the microbiological culture results. Subsequently, percutaneous irrigation was stopped and replace with simple drainage if the patient's condition continues to improved and the cavity confirmed by CT was resolution. If the drainage volume was less than 10 mL/day for 3 consecutive days, clamp the drainage tube and remove it finally.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 8
Est. completion date August 14, 2022
Est. primary completion date May 9, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Diagnosed with SAP - Concurrent IPN Exclusion Criteria: - Age <18 years or > 80 years - Patients or family members disagreed with this study

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Percutaneous Continuous Irrigation assisted Vacuum Drainage Combined With Transgastric Necrosectomy
All patients with SAP were given contrast enhanced CT scan within 48 hours after admission to identify the location and range of the necrosis. If the patient's condition progressively worsened, a multifunctional irrigation-assisted vacuum drainage tube was placed by the CT-guided Seldinger technique in each of the necrosis cavity. Subsequently, transgastric necrosectomy were performed by one or two experienced endoscopist under conscious sedation. The procedure was repeated until all loosely adherent necrotic material were cleared and replaced by granulation tissue. Percutaneous irrigation was stopped and replace with simple drainage if the patient's condition continues to improved and the cavity confirmed by CT was resolution. If the drainage volume was less than 10 mL/day for 3 consecutive days, clamp the drainage tube and remove it finally.

Locations

Country Name City State
China Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Nanjing Jiangsu

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Chinese Medical Association

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (5)

Jagielski M, Smoczynski M, Studniarek M, Adrych K. Endoscopic drainage combined with percutaneous drainage in treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis - a single-center experience. Prz Gastroenterol. 2018;13(2):137-142. doi: 10.5114/pg.2018.72604. Epub — View Citation

Lee JK, Kwak KK, Park JK, Yoon WJ, Lee SH, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Yoon YB. The efficacy of nonsurgical treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis. Pancreas. 2007 May;34(4):399-404. — View Citation

Ross A, Gluck M, Irani S, Hauptmann E, Fotoohi M, Siegal J, Robinson D, Crane R, Kozarek R. Combined endoscopic and percutaneous drainage of organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.037. Epub 200 — View Citation

Sahar N, Kozarek R, Kanji ZS, Ross AS, Gluck M, Gan SI, Larsen M, Irani S. Do lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) improve treatment outcomes of walled-off pancreatic necrosis over plastic stents using dual-modality drainage? Endosc Int Open. 2017 Nov;5(11) — View Citation

van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, Hofker HS, Boermeester MA, Dejong CH, van Goor H, Schaapherder AF, van Eijck CH, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Timmer R, Laméris JS, Kruyt PM, Manusama ER, van der Harst E, van der Schelling GP, Ka — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary mortality 28day-mortality Day28 after enrollment
Secondary PCD duration of PCD From the first catheter placement to total catheter removal
Secondary endoscopic procedures number of endoscopic procedures through study completion, an average of 3 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03002051 - EUS-guided Transenteric Drainage With a Novel Lumen-apposing Metal Stent N/A
Completed NCT04113499 - Endoscopic Necrosectomy Versus Step-up Endoscopic Intervention N/A
Recruiting NCT05601687 - Endoscopic Step-up Approach vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis N/A
Recruiting NCT06179459 - Registry of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections
Not yet recruiting NCT03788928 - Predicting Pancreatic Necrosis Using mitDNA
Not yet recruiting NCT06134024 - The Role of Double Pigtail Plastic Stents During Endoscopic Transmural Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections. N/A
Terminated NCT02673541 - Study of a Lumen- Apposing, Covered, Self-Expanding Metal Stent (Axios™) Versus Multiple Double Pigtail Stents N/A
Recruiting NCT05252897 - Timing of Necrosectomy After Endoscopic Drainage of Walled-off Pancreatic Necrosis (WON) N/A