Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of Different Suction Techniques for EUS-FNB of Pancreatic Solid Lesions

Pancreatic Mass Clinical Trial

Official title: Comparing the Diagnostic Efficacy of Different Suction Techniques for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy of Pancreatic Solid Lesions Using 25G Procore Needle: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicentric Clinical Study

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

There are many factors that can affect the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA, including lesion factors, the endoscoist experience, the needle size, the number of needle passes, and the suction technique. since diagnostic efficacy of different suction techniques for EUS-FNB is still uncertain, thus we decided to compare the diagnostic efficacy of three common methods: the 10 ml standard negative pressure, slow pull and wet suction.

Clinical Trial Description

the standard suction: after the needle is inserted in the mass, removing the stylet before performing EUS-FNA. Then attach a 10mL syringe to the end of needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured.

slow-pull : after the needle is inserted in the mass, slowly pull the stylet out while performing EUS-FNA with 20 times for-backward.

wet suction: after removing the stylet, the needle was flushed with 5mL of saline solution to replace the column of air with saline. A 10mL syringe was attached to the end of the needle. 20 times of for-backward Suction was applied after the lesion was punctured. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pancreatic Mass

• NCT number: NCT04100941
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Changhai Hospital
• Contact: Wei Zhou, M.D.
• Phone: +8618021009362
• Email: zhou_wei0012@163.com
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 10, 2019
• Completion date: November 30, 2020