View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Fistula.
Filter by:Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the standard treatment for tumors of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, duodenum, and ampulla of Vater. With advances in surgical experience and instrumentation, the mortality rate of PD has decreased to below 5% in high-volume pancreatic centers. However, the postoperative complication rate remains high at 25%-50%, limiting the development and application of PD. The main postoperative complications of PD are postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and biliary leakage (BL). POPF, BL, and the subsequent abdominal infection, PPH, etc. are the main causes of death during hospitalization. Even in large, relatively mature pancreatic centers, the incidence of POPF remains as high as 10%-40%. In recent years, various methods have been used to prevent and treat POPF and BL after PD, such as pancreatic duct stent external drainage and external biliary drainage. To date, there have been many studies by domestic and foreign scholars on the advantages and disadvantages of biliary and pancreatic duct external drainage versus internal drainage in PD in terms of perioperative POPF incidence, mortality rate, etc., but the research results are not consistent. Overall, pancreatic duct stent external drainage is only recommended for patients with a high risk of pancreatic fistula during PD. Currently, there have been a few relevant studies exploring and verifying the preventive effect of pancreatic duct stent external drainage on pancreatic fistula in patients with high risk of pancreatic fistula. For example, a retrospective study of 98 patients with soft pancreatic parenchyma by Teruyuki Usub et al. found that there was no significant difference between groups with and without pancreatic duct stent in preventing pancreatic fistula. However, due to the low level of evidence, only a few risk factors such as pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct diameter were included, and the risk of POPF was not systematically evaluated. Further clinical exploration and verification are needed. In 2013, Mark P Callery et al. proposed a pancreatic fistula risk score (The fistula risk score, FRS) based on the pancreatic fistula standard defined by the International Pancreatic Fistula Study Group, which included pancreatic texture, pathological type, pancreatic duct diameter, and intraoperative blood loss. This model can be used to systematically and quantitatively evaluate the risk of POPF. Previous studies did not have a clear stratification for patients undergoing pancreatic duct stent external drainage, which may have included too many patients with a low risk of pancreatic fistula, resulting in inaccurate results. Therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent external drainage in preventing clinically relevant pancreatic fistula based on stratification of pancreatic fistula risk and disease type. At the same time, pancreatic juice contains a variety of digestive enzymes, of which pancreatic lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin all need to be activated by bile to play a role in digesting and decomposing fat and protein. Theoretically, biliary and pancreatic juice diversion may be able to reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula and its related complications in PD patients. Thus, the investigators design the present study to evaluate the impact of main pancreatic duct and biliary duct external drainage on postoperative complication, especially POPF.
This observational study was conducted in patients undergoing elective pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy. It mainly answers the following two main questions: 1. What are the risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in different pancreatic surgeries? 2. What is the correlation between perioperative blood and interstitial fluid glucose level and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in different pancreatic surgeries？ Participants were not required to perform additional research work other than the usual postoperative follow-up within 30 days after surgery. No control group was set in this study, and no additional clinical intervention was performed.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the standard surgical operation for benign or malign pancreatic lesions. Pancreatic Fistula (PF) or Postpancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis (PPAP) are the major complications associated with that type of surgery. We need to develop preventive measures for these complications, which requires a better understanding of their physiopathology. The aim of this prospective monocentric and observational study is to identify predictive biomarkers and/or risk factors for PF or PPAP using metabolomics. The Profiling of circulating metabolites is indeed an original and promising approach for this purpose. We will also investigate the patient's immune status and its association with the occurrence of post-surgical complications. Participants will be adult patients scheduled to undergo elective pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery and patient's management will be as usual. During surgery, a fragment (0.1-0.2 g) of non-tumoral pancreatic tissue will be removed and frozen at -80°C for metabolomic analysis. For immunological assessment, 4 blood samples will be collected (before surgery and then 7 days, 1 and 3 months after, blood sampling).
The aim of this prospective, randomized, blinded clinical superiority trial is to establish intraoperative placement of biodegradable stents in the pancreatojejunostomy as a safe, effective, and feasible preventive measure against pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy. The investigators hypothesize that intraoperative placement of biodegradable stents in the pancreatojejunostomy is safe and can reduce the risk of pancreatic leakage following pancreatoduodenectomy in patients who have not undergone PBD.
Objective: To compare the outcomes after elective pancreatic resections using cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) and selective closure of small blood vessels and branch pancreatic ducts versus surgical scalpel or stapler for the transection of pancreatic tissue. Study design: A randomized controlled, single centre trial. Study population: Two groups of 80 patients (160 in total) scheduled for elective open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for any indication. Intervention: Transection of pancreatic tissue with CUSA. Control: Standard transection of pancreatic tissue with surgical scalpel (in PD) or stapler (in DP)
The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate if prolonged antibiotics after pancreatoduodenectomy can prevent the development of a pancreatic fistula and related complications. Participants who are at high risk of pancreatic fistula will be administered an extended course of antibiotics. While inpatient, the patient will receive these antibiotics through the vein, and after discharge, the antibiotics will be taken by mouth.
Distal pancreas resection is a relatively rare procedure with a known risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Until quite recently, no valid risk prediction models for this have been available. In 2022 two different risk scores DISPAIR and D-FRS were published. The aim of this study is to compare, validate and possibly improve those scores in a international retrospective multicenter cohort.
The prognostic value of external vs internal pancreatic duct stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of external and internal stents using the Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score in both high-risk and low-risk patients with regard to the incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.
The aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the efficacy of biodegradable internal pancreatic stenting versus no stenting in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), focusing on a possible superiority association of the device in preventing clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). Patients undergoing PD will be randomized into two arms: - arm 1: a biodegradable internal pancreatic stent will be placed at the level of the pancreatic anastomosis - arm 2: no pancreatic stent will be placed at the level of the pancreatic anastomosis The rate of occurrence of CR-POPF will be compared between the two arms.
To confirm the time point of CR-POPF of grade-B that patients with biochemical leak after PD or LPD turned into.