Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04494282 |
Other study ID # |
INCMNSZ |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
August 2015 |
Est. completion date |
May 2020 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2024 |
Source |
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) present as a complication that occurs in 5-15% of acute
pancreatitis and 26-40% of chronic pancreatitis (1-3). To date the endoscopic drainage with
endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has replace the surgical treatment due to the similar success and
complication rate but with a lower cost and short hospital stay (4-6). Regarding recurrence,
it is important to know the anatomy of the main pancreatic duct (MPD). For this purpose, the
endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) has been describe as a useful tool. In fact, many
authors perform it before the endoscopic drainage while others wait several weeks after the
drainage (7-9) with similar technical success (5,8). However, there are no studies that
compare the technical difficulty and the total cost between these two approaches.
Description:
METHODS: Random control trial between two groups. Group 1 the ERP will be performed the same
day of the endoscopic drainage of PP. Group 2 the ERP will be performed 6 weeks after the
endoscopic drainage of PP. Each ERP will be performed by an expert in ERP in patients who
fulfilled the Atlanta criteria for PP. The patients will be enrolled and informed consent
will be explained and signed. In those patients who ERP fails, a second attempt will be
performed 6 weeks after the endoscopic drainage of PP (Group 1) or a magnetic resonance
cholangiopancreatography will be performed (Group 2).