View clinical trials related to Pancreatic Cyst.
Filter by:The purpose of the Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection (PRECEDE) Consortium is to conduct research on multiple aspects of early detection and prevention of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by establishing a multisite cohort of individuals with family history of PDAC and/or individuals carrying pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in genes linked to PDAC risk for longitudinal follow up.
The aims of this study are to determine the natural history of pancreatic cysts and to propose and prospectively validate a diagnostic approach and model for prediction of mucinous versus non-mucinous, and malignant versus non-malignant, pancreatic cysts using a combination of clinical, radiologic, and biomarker characteristics.
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are a common incidental finding in cross sectional imaging (up to 27% on CT scan and 41% on MRI) and pose a management challenge to physicians. According to society guidelines, PCLs with specific features should prompt additional workup with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for cyst characterization as well as cyst sampling. This can help determine if the cyst is mucinous or non-mucinous which has implications for its malignant potential. Cyst fluid has traditionally been sampled using EUS with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and sent for fluid analysis and cytology. More recently, the adjunctive use of the through-the-scope micro forceps (Moray micro forceps, US Endoscopy, Mentor, OH) biopsy (EUS-MFB) has shown promise for diagnosis of PCLs. This technology utilizes a micro forceps through a 19-gauge needle to biopsy the cyst wall for histology, in addition to collecting cyst fluid for CEA level and cytology. More recently, the adjunctive use of the Moray® through the needle micro forceps biopsy (EUS-MFB) has shown promise for diagnosis of PCLs. This technology utilizes a micro forceps through a 19-gauge needle to biopsy the cyst wall for histology, in addition to collecting cyst fluid for CEA level and cytology. Only a few small retrospective reports have been published regarding the use of MFB. The results of this study will hopefully help increase diagnostic yield by obtaining a histopathologic diagnosis of these PCLs, and potentially affect practice patterns of gastroenterologists and the endoscopic community, specifically those physicians who perform EUS in these patients. Furthermore, the results will help determine whether there is reason to continue this line of research to obtain a definite histologic tissue diagnosis of PCLs.
This multicenter randomized trial aims to primarily assess and compare the functional recovery of patients who undergo open versus robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the head of the pancreas.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether quantitative contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) improves the evaluation of pancreas tumors and precursor lesions, including cysts, compared to conventional endoscopic ultrasound.
Pancreatic cysts are found incidentally on 15-50% of CT and MRIs for all indications and their prevalence is increasing. Many of these cysts may be precursors to pancreatic cancer, and thus pose a substantial risk, however, the vast majority are benign. Increased detection of pancreatic cysts provides an opportunity to diagnose pancreatic malignancy at an early, curable stage yet also increases the potential to over-treat clinically insignificant lesions. This presents a clinical challenge to prevent unnecessary resection of indolent disease, with associated risks of infections, bleeding, diabetes, and costly disability. Unfortunately, there is little information on the epidemiology and natural history of pancreatic cysts to help guide management.
The Florida Pancreas Collaborative wants to partner with individuals who are known to have, or are suspected to have a pancreatic lesion, tumor, cyst, mass, cancer, or pancreatitis and are undergoing diagnosis and treatment at a participating institution. The goals of this project are to build a large database of information obtained from blood, tissue, medical images, surveys and information from routine care to develop noninvasive diagnostic approaches that could be used as decision-making tools to effectively personalize clinical care.
The purpose of this study is to compare the two approaches for monitoring pancreatic cysts. The study doctors want to compare more frequent monitoring vs less frequent monitoring in order to learn which monitoring method leads to better outcome for patients with pancreatic cysts.
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) is increasing due to improvements of cross-sectional imaging. It is mandatory, for appropriate management, to make an accurate diagnosis and risk stratification, since some of these lesions may harbor malignancy or have potential for malignant transformation and hence surgical resection is required. Diagnostic evaluation of PCLs can be challenging, requiring a combination of different methods. Usually PCLs are been initially detected by cross-sectional imaging. However, imaging alone has not been shown to reliably identify the underlying pathology in PCLs with a high degree of accuracy. Hence, Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is routinely performed. EUS-FNA plays an important role in cyst characterization since allows morphological examination (EUS-B mode), aspiration for cytology and cyst fluid analysis for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), amylase and glucose levels; and allows to tissue sample in case of mural nodules o wall thickness. Even though EUS-FNA has been shown to be the test of choice for select lesions with high-risk features, has its limitations related to low sensitivity and specificity. The morphological characterization by EUS of PCL, as well as with the cross-sectional images, depends most of the time, on the subjective interpretation of the operator, which can be very difficult sometimes and depend on experience. A cyst fluid CEA cutoff of 192 ng/mL has been commonly accepted for differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous cysts. However, has the limitation of requiring at least 0.5 mL of cyst fluid for CEA analysis, has a relatively low sensitivity (75%) and specificity (84%), cannot differentiate cyst histotypes, and controversial results have been reported. Finally targeted cyst wall with the tip of the FNA needle can increase the diagnostic accuracy, yet the cytological yield with EUS-FNA remains low due to the relatively small tissue sample. Hence, diagnostic accuracy of currently available tools for evaluation of PCLs including cross-sectional imaging, EUS morphologic features, EUS-FNA for cyst fluid analysis and cytology is not perfect, leading to possible misdiagnosis.
Researchers are trying to find out whether new tests ("biomarkers") of blood, stool, pancreas cyst fluid, or pancreas juice can be used to diagnose malignant or pre-malignant changes in pancreas cysts.