Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Open-label, Dose-escalation to Rash Study to Assess the Effect of Tarceva in Combination With Gemcitabine on Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
Verified date | January 2015 |
Source | Hoffmann-La Roche |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Italy:National Institue of Health |
Study type | Interventional |
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of escalating versus standard doses to rash of Tarceva, in combination with gemcitabine, in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. During a 4 week run-in period, all patients will receive Tarceva 100mg/day po plus gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8,15 and 22. After 4 weeks, patients who have not developed rash, or only develop grade 1 rash, will be randomized to one of 2 groups. Group 1 will receive a starting dose of Tarceva 150mg po daily, increased in steps of 50mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 250mg/day po, until development of grade 2 rash or other dose-limiting toxicity. Group 2 will continue to receive Tarceva 100mg/day po. All patients will continue to receive gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 467 |
Est. completion date | February 2012 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2012 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - adult patients, >=18 years of age; - histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic cancer with measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease; - ECOG performance status of 0-1. Exclusion Criteria: - local, or locally advanced, pancreatic cancer; - prior systemic treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer; - <=6 months since last adjuvant chemotherapy; - other malignancies within last 5 years, except for adequately treated cancer in situ of the cervix, or basal or squamous cell skin cancer. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hoffmann-La Roche |
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Died Assessed From Point of Randomization | Overall survival (OS) assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. | Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months. | No |
Primary | OS Assessed From Point of Randomization | OS assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the median time, in months, from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology. | Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From Point of Randomization | Progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or death due to any cause. For target lesions (TLs), PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. | Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | PFS Assessed From Point of Randomization | PFS assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the median time, in weeks, from randomization to disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology. | Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST | BOR was defined as a confirmed CR or PR for at least 4 weeks. CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline (BL) SLD. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using Pearson-Clopper method. | BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a CR, PR, Stable Disease (SD), or PD According to RECIST | CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL SLD SD was defined as neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method. | BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With SD (Maintained for at Least 8 Weeks) or CR or PR (Maintained for at Least 4 Weeks) According to RECIST | Disease control was defined as a participant with a response of CR or PR for at least 4 weeks at any time during treatment, or SD that was maintained for at least 8 weeks after the start of treatment. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method. | BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Died as Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In | OS assessed from the start of the 4-week run in period was defined as the time from BL to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. | BL and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | OS Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In | OS assessed from the start of the 4-week run in period was defined as the median time, in months, from BL to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology. | BL and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In | PFS as assessed from the start of 4-week run-in was defined as the time from BL to the first occurrence of PD according to RECIST or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. | BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death for up to 46 months. | No |
Secondary | PFS Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In | PFS assessed from the start of 4-week run-in was defined as the median time, in weeks, from BL to disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology. | BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death for up to 46 months. | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT05305001 -
Germline Mutations Associated With Hereditary Pancreatic Cancer in Unselected Patients With Pancreatic Cancer in Mexico
|
||
Completed |
NCT02526017 -
Study of Cabiralizumab in Combination With Nivolumab in Patients With Selected Advanced Cancers
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04927780 -
Perioperative or Adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06054984 -
TCR-T Cells in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05919537 -
Study of an Anti-HER3 Antibody, HMBD-001, With or Without Chemotherapy in Patients With Solid Tumors Harboring an NRG1 Fusion or HER3 Mutation
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT03140670 -
Maintenance Rucaparib in BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 Mutated Pancreatic Cancer That Has Not Progressed on Platinum-based Therapy
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT00529113 -
Study With Gemcitabine and RTA 402 for Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05168527 -
The First Line Treatment of Fruquintinib Combined With Albumin Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04383210 -
Study of Seribantumab in Adult Patients With NRG1 Gene Fusion Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05391126 -
GENOCARE: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Genotype-Guided Dosing Versus Usual Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03300921 -
A Phase Ib Pharmacodynamic Study of Neoadjuvant Paricalcitol in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer A Phase Ib Pharmacodynamic Study of Neoadjuvant Paricalcitol in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT03153410 -
Pilot Study With CY, Pembrolizumab, GVAX, and IMC-CS4 (LY3022855) in Patients With Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03175224 -
APL-101 Study of Subjects With NSCLC With c-Met EXON 14 Skip Mutations and c-Met Dysregulation Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05679583 -
Preoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04183478 -
The Efficacy and Safety of K-001 in the Treatment of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT03600623 -
Folfirinox or Gemcitabine-Nab Paclitaxel Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04584008 -
Targeted Agent Evaluation in Digestive Cancers in China Based on Molecular Characteristics
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05351983 -
Patient-derived Organoids Drug Screen in Pancreatic Cancer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04290364 -
Early Palliative Care in Pancreatic Cancer - a Quasi-experimental Study
|