Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05637567 |
Other study ID # |
DKFZ-2022-006 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
Phase 2
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 2024 |
Est. completion date |
March 2029 |
Study information
Verified date |
November 2023 |
Source |
German Cancer Research Center |
Contact |
Sebastian Schoelch, MD |
Phone |
+49621383 |
Email |
s.schoelch[@]dkfz.de |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This randomized, controlled clinical trial compares the perioperative treatment with
acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) in patients with cancer of the pancreatic head. The main
question it aims to answer is: Do patients treated perioperatively with aspirin develop less
metastasis after curative resection of pancreatic head tumors?
Participants will be asked to :
- take a daily aspirin tablet starting 1-4 weeks before surgery until 6 months after
surgery
- participate in regular follow-up visits.
Description:
With few symptoms, rapid progression and early metastasis pancreatic cancer (pancreatic
ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In early
stages of PDAC, surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the mainstay of
treatment. Unfortunately, the majority of patients develop tumor recurrence (most frequently
in the liver) despite complete resection and adjuvant treatment. This early postoperative
recurrence is a result of preoperatively present, undetected micrometastases, and, most
importantly, iatrogenic dissemination of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by surgical
manipulation of the tumor during resection. CTCs can be detected in the majority of PDAC
patients and correlate with worse overall survival.
Survival of CTCs in the hostile environment of circulation requires resistance to physical
forces (i.e., turbulence, shear stress), but also immune escape mechanisms to avoid clearance
by immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells. CTCs are highly heterogeneous and, by the
majority, non-tumorigenic. The number of other nucleated blood cells such as leukocytes
greatly exceeds the number of CTCs; in many solid tumors including PDAC, the average number
of (detectable) CTCs is less than 10 cells / mL of whole blood. This demonstrates the
inefficiency of the metastatic process, which is at least partially a result of early
clearance of CTCs after entering the blood stream.
After entering circulation, the first cells that CTCs come in direct contact with are
platelets. This leads to activation of platelets and aggregation on the CTCs, which are thus
enveloped and protected from the hostile environment in the circulation. This effect is seen
in many, but not all CTCs, the underlying molecular mechanisms are currently being
investigated. It is conceivable that not only shear forces and turbulence have less influence
on CTCs enveloped by platelets, but also that immune cells (e.g. NK cells) in the bloodstream
are less likely to detect and eliminate CTCs and therapeutic antibodies have fewer binding
sites.
Arguably the most decisive days in the lives of cancer patients are when they undergo surgery
for tumor resection. For most solid tumors, surgery is part of all curative treatment
regimens. However, the occurrence of distant metastases often brings surgery to its limits,
either because not all metastatic lesions are resectable, or due to rapidly recurring
metastatic disease after surgery. Many patients develop disseminated disease early after
curative resection of an initially non-metastatic tumor. There are several potential reasons
behind this phenomenon, most prominently the immunosuppression resulting from major surgery
and the iatrogenic dissemination of CTCs during surgery. Surgery-related immunosuppression is
addressed by continuous improvement of perioperative medicine such as prehabilitation or
early recovery / fast-track programs as well as minimally invasive surgical procedures,
whenever possible. However, only few measures have been taken so far to reduce iatrogenic
dissemination of tumor cells during PDAC surgery.
During cancer surgery, the tumor is inevitably touched, manipulated or even squeezed as it
has to be mobilized from its surroundings while limiting the damage to neighboring
structures. This manipulation of the tumor leads to iatrogenic CTC dissemination. The only
clinically used measure to reduce tumor cell dissemination during surgery is currently an
early ligation of tumor-draining veins prior to manipulation and mobilization of the tumor
mass. This method can only be employed in tumor entities that are drained by one or few
well-defined veins such as lung cancer or colorectal cancer, in which this method is
successfully applied. In other tumors, which are drained by multiple small and/or initially
inaccessible vessels (e.g., hepatic tumors) or in which the tumor-draining vein cannot be
occluded for prolonged periods of time (e.g., the portal vein draining tumors of the
pancreatic head), this "vein first" or "no touch" approach is not applicable. Since
especially in pancreatic tumors, hepatic recurrence often occurs after curative resection and
inevitably leads to the death of the patient, this represents a major clinical problem.
Approximately 5% of cancer patients are on permanent medication with platelet inhibition
(PI), most prominently acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) for a cardiac indication. ASA is
usually taken orally at a dosage of 100 mg once a day and several studies and meta-analyses
have shown that perioperative ASA intake at this standard dosage leads only to a slightly
increased risk of bleeding. Therefore, platelet aggregation inhibition with aspirin alone is
continued perioperatively nowadays and is classified as safe.
ASA medication leads to increased overall survival in several cancer entities. A
meta-analysis of 22 studies evaluating survival of colorectal cancer patients in dependence
of ASA treatment revealed a significant survival advantage for patients with continuous ASA
treatment in comparison with patients who did not take ASA or terminated ASA intake prior to
or at the time point of tumor diagnosis.
So far, despite ample preclinical evidence, only few clinical studies have investigated the
effect of ASA treatment on PDAC. Recently published, retrospective data indicates a
significantly improved survival after curative resection of PDAC for patients with
perioperative low-dose ASA medication, which is directly attributable to a reduced
postoperative incidence of distant metastases. A preliminary meta-analysis (incorporating a
second study investigating ASA treatment in PDAC) confirms the significantly improved
disease-free survival after resection of PDAC in patients under permanent platelet inhibition
with ASA. There is also evidence of a reduced incidence of distant metastases under ASA
treatment in other tumor entities.
The investigators hypothesize that the reason for the reduced incidence of distant metastases
achieved by ASA is the inhibited platelet-mediated protection of CTCs.
In conclusion, perioperative platelet inhibition with ASA may drastically reduce the
postoperative incidence of hematogenous metastases with very low toxicity and risk to the
patients with PDAC. Despite this favorable benefit-risk ratio, no prospective,
randomized-controlled trials investigating this treatment have been conducted. As a result
and despite its potential benefits, perioperative ASA treatment in patients undergoing
resection of the pancreatic head for malignant indications is currently not generally
recommended.
The aim of this multicentric randomized-controlled trial is therefore to investigate the
impact of perioperative ASA treatment on the occurrence of hematogenous metastases, survival
and perioperative complications in patients undergoing pancreatic head resection
(pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy / Traverso-Longmire procedure) for PDAC.