Incidence of POPF in the Resection of the Left Pancreas With RFAT

Pancreas Cancer Clinical Trial

— RFATPancreas  

Official title:

Incidence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in the Resection of the Left Pancreas With a Radiofrequency Assisted Transection Device (RFAT-Pancreas)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03570502
• Other study ID #: 2017/7697/I
• Status: Recruiting
• Start date: November 2016
• Est. completion date: April 2021

Study information

• Verified date: June 2018
• Source: Hospital del Mar
• Contact: Ignasi Poves, Phd, MD
• Phone: 93 248 32 07
• Email: ipoves[@]parcdesalutmar.ca
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluates the impact of the Radiofrequency assisted transection on the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after performing distal pancreatectomies, central pancreatectomies and pancreatic enucleation

Description:

Among the different methods for sealing the remaining pancreas, resection and sealing devices assisted by radiofrequency energy (RF) have been used, both in experimental studies and in clinical trials, in order to try to reduce the POPF rate. One of these devices is the Coolinside®, which is approved for this indication and is currently used in selected cases, at the Hospital del Mar, among other centers.

Although there are several published studies based on similar technology, the existing publications on the use of Coolinside® in the pancreas have been made in rat and pig animal models. In particular, the most recent study published by Dorcaratto et al. compares the Coolinside device vs. the mechanical stapler in porcine model when performing distal pancreatectomies. The results suggest that the Coolinside device was more efficient in the control of the POPF than the stapler with a POPF index of 12% vs. 36%.

Therefore, this study aims to obtain more clinical evidence about the use of Coolinside in pancreatic resections within a clinical context.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 38
• Est. completion date: April 2021
• Est. primary completion date: April 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients with benign or malignant lesions of the pancreas

• Subjected to distal, central pancreatectomy or enucleations of the left pancreas

• Patients ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III

• Open or laparoscopic approach.

Exclusion Criteria:

• ASA =IV patients

• Patients with limitrophic or neuroendocrine lesions

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Adenocarcinoma
• Benign Pancreas Tumor
• Pancreas Cancer
• Pancreas Neoplasm
• Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
• Pancreatic Neoplasms

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital del Mar	Barcelona

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital del Mar

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (11)

Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13. Review. — View Citation

Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Review. — View Citation

Burdío F, Dorcaratto D, Hernandez L, Andaluz A, Moll X, Quesada R, Poves I, Grande L, Cáceres M, Berjano E. Radiofrequency-induced heating versus mechanical stapler for pancreatic stump closure: in vivo comparative study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016 May;32(3):272-80. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1136845. Epub 2016 Jan 29. — View Citation

Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I, Kleeff J, Glanemann M, Butturini G, Tomazic A, Bruns CJ, Busch OR, Farkas S, Belyaev O, Neoptolemos JP, Halloran C, Keck T, Niedergethmann M, Gellert K, Witzigmann H, Kollmar O, Langer P, Steger U, Neudecker J, Berrevoet F, Ganzera S, Heiss MM, Luntz SP, Bruckner T, Kieser M, Büchler MW. Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1514-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60237-7. — View Citation

Dorcaratto D, Burdío F, Fondevila D, Andaluz A, Quesada R, Poves I, Caceres M, Mayol X, Berjano E, Grande L. Radiofrequency is a secure and effective method for pancreatic transection in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results of a randomized, controlled trial in an experimental model. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3710-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2952-1. Epub 2013 Apr 13. — View Citation

Ecker BL, McMillan MT, Allegrini V, Bassi C, Beane JD, Beckman RM, Behrman SW, Dickson EJ, Callery MP, Christein JD, Drebin JA, Hollis RH, House MG, Jamieson NB, Javed AA, Kent TS, Kluger MD, Kowalsky SJ, Maggino L, Malleo G, Valero V 3rd, Velu LKP, Watkins AA, Wolfgang CL, Zureikat AH, Vollmer CM Jr. Risk Factors and Mitigation Strategies for Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: Analysis of 2026 Resections From the International, Multi-institutional Distal Pancreatectomy Study Group. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug 29. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002491. [Epub ahead of print] — View Citation

Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Riall TS, Lillemoe KD. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Dec;8(8):951-9. — View Citation

Malleo G, Vollmer CM Jr. Postpancreatectomy Complications and Management. Surg Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;96(6):1313-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2016.07.013. Review. — View Citation

Quesada R, Andaluz A, Cáceres M, Moll X, Iglesias M, Dorcaratto D, Poves I, Berjano E, Grande L, Burdío F. Long-term evolution of acinar-to-ductal metaplasia and ß-cell mass after radiofrequency-assisted transection of the pancreas in a controlled large animal model. Pancreatology. 2016 Jan-Feb;16(1):38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Nov 18. — View Citation

Quesada R, Burdío F, Iglesias M, Dorcaratto D, Cáceres M, Andaluz A, Poves I, Castiella T, Sánchez P, Berjano E, Grande L. Radiofrequency pancreatic ablation and section of the main pancreatic duct does not lead to necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2014 Aug;43(6):931-7. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000156. — View Citation

Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, Wang WM, Wan YL, Huang YT. Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Apr 28;11(16):2456-61. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Postoperative pancreatic fistula according the 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS)	"Grade A postoperative pancreatic fistula" is now redefined and called a "biochemical leak," because it has no clinical importance and is no longer referred to a true pancreatic fistula. Postoperative pancreatic fistula grades B and C are confirmed but defined more strictly. In particular, grade B requires a change in the postoperative management; drains are either left in place >3 weeks or repositioned through endoscopic or percutaneous procedures. Grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula refers to those postoperative pancreatic fistula that require reoperation or lead to single or multiple organ failure and/or mortality attributable to the pancreatic fistula.	1 month
Secondary	Sex	Gender or the patient (Male/Female)	Inclusion of the patient in the study
Secondary	Age	Age of the patient (expressed in years) at the moment of the intervention	Inclusion of the patient in the study
Secondary	Consistency of the pancreas	It can be defined as "normal", "soft" or "fibrotic"	Inclusion of the patient in the study
Secondary	Level of jaundice	Bilirubin level at the moment of the intervention and during the first week of postoperative period	At the moment of the intervention and during the first week of postoperative period
Secondary	Type of surgical procedure	Enucleation, central pancreatectomy or distal pancreatectomy	Inclusion of the patient in the study
Secondary	Laparoscopic or open surgery	Laparoscopic or open surgery	Inclusion of the patient in the study
Secondary	Total bleeding	Measured during the procedure	During the intervention
Secondary	Size of the pancreatic duct	Size of the main pancreatic duct expressed in mm, measured on the last CT before the procedure	CT scan prior to surgery
Secondary	Type of tumour	Serous cystadenoma Acinar cystadenoma Ductal adenocarcinoma Acinar cell carcinoma Cystadenocarcinoma of acinar cells Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia associated with invasive carcinoma Mixed carcinoma (ductal-neuroendocrine or acinar-neuroendocrine) Cystic mucinous neoplasia associated with invasive carcinoma Pancreatoblastoma Serous cystadenocarcinoma Pseudopapillary-solid neoplasia	Diagnosis
Secondary	Postoperative follow-up	Months of follow-up since the pancreatic procedure	1 year
Secondary	Type of the postoperative complication	Description of the type of complication	1 month
Secondary	Body Mass Index (BMI)	Measured such as: BMI in kg/m^2	Prior the surgery and during the PO follow-up (1 and 6 months)
Secondary	Diabetes	Does the patient has diabetes before or after the precedure?	Before the precedure and during the PO follow-up (1 and 6 months)