Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04015518
Other study ID # 1368-0016
Secondary ID 2018-003078-28
Status Completed
Phase Phase 2
First received
Last updated
Start date July 31, 2019
Est. completion date July 28, 2021

Study information

Verified date June 2022
Source Boehringer Ingelheim
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary objective is to provide dose-ranging data for 4 dose regimens of BI 655130 compared to placebo on the primary endpoint of percentage change from baseline in PPP ASI at Week 16. The target dose(s) will be estimated from the model by incorporating information on the minimum clinically relevant effect and accounting for safety. Supportive dose-ranging assessments will also be done on pre-specified secondary endpoints.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 152
Est. completion date July 28, 2021
Est. primary completion date August 6, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - 18 to 75 years of legal age (according to local legislation) at screening. - Diagnosis of Palmoplantar Pustulosis defined as presence of primary, persistent (>3 months duration), sterile, macroscopically visible pustules on the palms and/or soles, without or with plaque psoriasis elsewhere on the body. - PPP PGA of at least moderate severity (=3) at screening and baseline. - A minimum PPP ASI score of 12 at screening and baseline. - Male or female patients. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2). - Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with ICH GCP and local legislation prior to admission to the trial. - Further criteria apply. Exclusion Criteria: - Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial. - Severe, progressive, or uncontrolled condition such as renal, hepatic, haematological, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurologic, cerebral, or psychiatric disease, or signs and symptoms thereof. - Presence or known history of anti-TNF-induced PPP-like disease. - Patient with a transplanted organ (with exception of a corneal transplant >12 weeks Prior to screening) or who have ever received stem cell therapy (e.g., Prochymal). - Known history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma, or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly. - Further criteria apply.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Spesolimab
Subcutaneous injections of Spesolimab starting at week 16, for a total treatment time until week 52.
Placebo
Subcutaneous injections of placebo matching Spesolimab from week 0 to 16.
Spesolimab
Subcutaneous injections of Spesolimab in a low dose scheme for a total treatment time of 52 weeks.
Spesolimab
Subcutaneous injections of Spesolimab in a medium-low dose scheme for a total treatment time of 52 weeks.
Spesolimab
Subcutaneous injections of Spesolimab in a medium-high dose scheme for a total treatment time of 52 weeks.
Spesolimab
Subcutaneous injections of Spesolimab in a high dose scheme for a total treatment time of 52 weeks.

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Skin Health Institute Inc Carlton Victoria
Australia Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville Victoria
Australia Woden Dermatology Phillip Australian Capital Territory
Australia Westmead Hospital Westmead New South Wales
Australia Veracity Clinical Research Wooloongabba Queensland
Belgium Brussels - UNIV Saint-Luc Bruxelles
Belgium UZ Leuven Leuven
Canada SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Centre Barrie Ontario
Canada Dr. Irina Turchin PC Inc. Fredericton New Brunswick
Canada The Guenther Dermatology Research Centre London Ontario
Canada Innovaderm Research Inc. Montreal Quebec
Canada CARe Clinic Red Deer Alberta
Canada York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre Richmond Hill Ontario
Canada K. Papp Clinical Research Inc. Waterloo Ontario
Czechia CCBR Czech a.s. Pardubice
Czechia Sanatorium Prof. Arenebergera Prague
Czechia CCBR Czech Prague s.r.o. Prague 3
France HOP l'Archet Nice
France HOP Saint-Louis Paris
France HOP Larrey Toulouse
Germany Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin
Germany Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen
Germany Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main
Germany Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg
Germany Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel Kiel
Hungary CRU Hungary Ltd, Private Practice, Miskolc Miskolc
Hungary University of Pecs Pecs
Hungary Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital Szombathely
Hungary Veszprem County Csolnoky Ferenc Hospital Veszprem
Japan Nagoya City University Hospital Aichi, Nagoya
Japan Fujita Health University Hospital Aichi, Toyoake
Japan Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital Chiba, Ichikawa
Japan Ehime University Hospital Ehime, Toon
Japan Fukuoka University Hospital Fukuoka, Fukuoka
Japan Gifu University Hospital Gifu, Gifu
Japan Asahikawa Kosei General Hospital Hokkaido, Asahikawa
Japan Asahikawa Medical University Hospital Hokkaido, Asahikawa
Japan Takagi Dermatological Clinic Hokkaido, Obihiro
Japan Hosui General Medical Clinic Hokkaido, Sapporo
Japan Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital Kagawa, Takamatsu
Japan Sagamihara National Hospital Kanagawa, Sagamihara
Japan Kumamoto University Hospital Kumamoto, Kumamoto
Japan University Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto, Kyoto
Japan Tohoku University Hospital Miyagi, Sendai
Japan Shinshu University Hospital Nagano, Matsumoto
Japan Okayama University Hospital Okayama, Okayama
Japan University of the Ryukyus Hospital Okinawa, Nakagami-gun
Japan Nakatsu Dermatology Clinic Osaka, Osaka
Japan Osaka City University Hospital Osaka, Osaka
Japan Kindai University Hospital Osaka, Osaka-sayama
Japan Osaka University Hospital Osaka, Suita
Japan Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital Shiga, Otsu
Japan Jichi Medical University Hospital Tochigi, Shimotsuke
Japan Nihon University Itabashi Hospital Tokyo, Itabashi-ku
Japan Teikyo University Hospital Tokyo, Itabashi-ku
Japan Seibo Hospital Tokyo, Shinjuku
Japan Tokyo Medical University Hospital Tokyo, Shinjuku-ku
Japan Shirasaki Dermatology and Neurology Clinic Toyama, Takaoka
Japan Wakayama Medical University Hospital Wakayama, Wakayama
Korea, Republic of Gachon University Gil Medical Center Incheon
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Hospital Seoul
Netherlands Amphia Ziekenhuis Breda
Poland Barbara Rewerska Diamond Clinic, Krakow Krakow
Poland Dermoklinika medical center, Lodz Lodz
Poland Independent Public Clin.Hosp.no1 Lublin Lublin
Poland Municipal Hospital Complex in Olsztyn Olsztyn
Poland Dermmedica Sp. z o.o., Wroclaw Wroclaw
Russian Federation SBHI Chelyabinsk Reg.Clin.Derma.Dispen. Chelyabinsk
Russian Federation LLC "Medical Center Azbuka Zdorovia" Kazan
Russian Federation Dermatovenereological Dispensary #10, St. Petersburg Saint-Petersburg
Taiwan National Taiwan University Hospital Taipei
United Kingdom Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital Exeter
United Kingdom Guy's Hospital London
United States Wallace Medical Group Beverly Hills California
United States Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center, PC Birmingham Alabama
United States University of Missouri Health System Columbia Missouri
United States Menter Dermatology Research Institute Dallas Texas
United States The Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey East Windsor New Jersey
United States University of Utah Health Murray Utah
United States Virginia Clinical Research, Inc. Norfolk Virginia
United States Skin Specialists, P.C. Omaha Nebraska
United States Epiphany Dermatology of Kansas, LLC Overland Park Kansas
United States Paddington Testing Co., Inc. Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Washington University School of Medicine Saint Louis Missouri
United States Therapeutics Clinical Research San Diego California
United States Advanced Medical Research PC Sandy Springs Georgia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Boehringer Ingelheim

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Belgium,  Canada,  Czechia,  France,  Germany,  Hungary,  Japan,  Korea, Republic of,  Netherlands,  Poland,  Russian Federation,  Taiwan,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary The Percentage Change in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPP ASI) at Week 16 From Baseline The percentage change in PPP ASI at Week 16 from baseline. The PPP ASI is a tool that provides a numeric scoring for patients overall PPP disease state, ranging from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). It is a linear combination of the percent of surface area of skin that is affected on the palms and soles of the body and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation): The percent change from baseline is calculated as (PPP ASI current - PPP ASI baseline) / PPP ASI baseline * 100%.
Least square (LS) means, differences and confidence intervals were estimated by (Restricted maximum likelihood)-based Mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit, region and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit as well as random effects of subject. Values post rescue medication or 6 weeks following last study treatment before discontinuation were censored. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
week 0 (baseline) and week 16
Secondary Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 4 Change from baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at Week 4. The PPP Pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity due to palmoplantar pustulosis on palms and/or soles. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal or vertical line, 10 centimeters (cm) in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end (score ranges from "no pain" at 0 cm to "very severe pain" at 10 cm). The patient was asked to place a vertical ( | ) mark on the horizontal line to indicate the severity of the pain.
Least square (LS) means, differences and confidence intervals were estimated by (Restricted maximum likelihood)-based MMRM including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit, region and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit as well as random effects of subject. Values post rescue medication or 6 weeks following last study treatment before discontinuation were censored. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
week 0 (baseline) and week 4.
Secondary Change From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score at Week 16 Change from baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at Week 16. The PPP Pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity due to palmoplantar pustulosis on palms and/or soles. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal or vertical line, 10 centimeters (cm) in length, anchored by word descriptors at each end (score ranges from "no pain" at 0 cm to "very severe pain" at 10 cm). The patient was asked to place a vertical ( | ) mark on the horizontal line to indicate the severity of the pain.
Least square (LS) means, differences and confidence intervals were estimated by (Restricted maximum likelihood)-based MMRM including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit, region and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit as well as random effects of subject. Values post rescue medication or 6 weeks following last study treatment before discontinuation were censored. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
week 0 (baseline) and week 16.
Secondary Palmoplantar Pustulosis Severity Index (PPP SI) Change From Baseline at Week 16 PPP SI change from baseline at Week 16. The PPP SI is based on the severity score of individual components (erythema, pustules, and scaling/desquamation) of PPP ASI assessments. The most severely affected area based on pustules was identified by the investigator at baseline and assessed at all subsequent visits. The PPP SI was calculated by summing up the individual components of PPP ASI assessment (range 0 (best) to 12 (worst)) at each visit for the identified location.
Least square (LS) means, differences and confidence intervals were estimated by (Restricted maximum likelihood)-based Mixed effect model for repeated measurements (MMRM) including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit, region and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit as well as random effects of subject. Values post rescue medication or 6 weeks following last study treatment before discontinuation were censored. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
week 0 (baseline) and week 16.
Secondary Number of Patients Achieving a 50% Decrease From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index Score at Week 16 (PPP ASI50) Number of patients achieving a 50% decrease from baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index score at week 16 (PPP ASI50). The PPP ASI is an investigator assessment of the extent and severity of palmoplantar pustulosis lesions on the palms and soles in PPP patients. This tool provides a numeric scoring for patients overall PPP disease state, ranging from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). It is a linear combination of the percent of surface area of skin that is affected on the palms and soles of the body and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation). When (PPP ASI baseline - PPP ASI current)/ PPP ASI baseline * 100% >= 50%, PPP ASI50 = 1. week 0 (baseline) and week 16
Secondary Number of Patients Achieving a 75% Decrease From Baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index Score at Week 16 (PPP ASI75) Number of patients achieving a 75% decrease from baseline in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index score at week 16 (PPP ASI75). The PPP ASI is an investigator assessment of the extent and severity of palmoplantar pustulosis lesions on the palms and soles in PPP patients. This tool provides a numeric scoring for patients overall PPP disease state, ranging from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). It is a linear combination of the percent of surface area of skin that is affected on the palms and soles of the body and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation). When (PPP ASI baseline - PPP ASI current)/ PPP ASI baseline * 100% >= 75%, PPP ASI75 = 1. week 0 (baseline) and week 16
Secondary Number of Patients With Palmoplantar Pustulosis Physician Global Assessment (PPP PGA) Clear/Almost Clear (0 or 1) at Week 16 Number of patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Physician Global Assessment (PPP PGA) clear/almost clear (0 or 1) at Week 16. The PPP PGA relies on investigator assessment of the patient's skin presentation on the palms and soles. The investigator scored the individual components (erythema, pustules, and scaling/crusting) from 0 (best) to 4 (worst) as clear, almost clear, mild, moderate or severe. PPP PGA categorization is based on the mean of the four individual components. week 0 (baseline) and week 16
Secondary Number of Patients With Palmoplantar Pustulosis Physician Global Assessment (PPP PGA) Pustules Clear/Almost Clear (0 or 1) at Week 16 Number of patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis Physician Global Assessment (PPP PGA) pustules clear/almost clear (0 or 1) at Week 16. The PPP PGA relies on investigator assessment of the patient's skin presentation on the palms and soles. The investigator scored the pustules from 0 (best) to 4 (worst) as clear, almost clear, mild, moderate or severe. week 0 (baseline) and week 16
Secondary The Percentage Change in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPP ASI) at Week 52 From Baseline The percentage change in PPP ASI at Week 52 from baseline. The PPP ASI is an investigator assessment of the extent and severity of palmoplantar pustulosis lesions on the palms and soles in PPP patients. This tool provides a numeric scoring for patients overall PPP disease state, ranging from 0 (best) to 72 (worst). It is a linear combination of the percent of surface area of skin that is affected on the palms and soles of the body and the severity of erythema, pustules, and scaling (desquamation).
LS means, differences and confidence intervals were estimated by (Restricted maximum likelihood)-based MMRM including the fixed, categorical effects of treatment at each visit, region and the continuous effect of baseline at each visit as well as random effects of subject. Values post rescue medication or 6 weeks following last study treatment before discontinuation were censored. Unstructured covariance matrix was used.
week 0 (baseline) and week 52
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04451720 - Study of Subcutaneous Risankizumab Injection to Assess Change in Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index [PPPASI] in Adult Japanese Participants With Palmoplantar Pustulosis Phase 3

External Links