View clinical trials related to Pain Relief.
Filter by:Venipuncture is one of the painful procedures most frequently performed in children. Pain and distress management in children, during needle related procedures, is warranted. The base for pain management starts with behavioural and environmental support and distraction. Distraction is a cognitive strategy trying to divert the child's attention from a noxious stimulus. Active distraction involves the child in a different performance, e.g. playing, during pain procedures. Passive distraction redirects the child's attention to visual or auditory stimuli using toys, songs, movies or blowing bubbles. Blood-drawing centre is a peculiar setting in which many procedures have to be performed in a limited time. Patients usually arrive without a pharmacological premedication and go away immediately after procedure. In this context distraction is an excellent pain relief tool. The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of an active distraction (playing a videogame using a computer tablet) with a passive distraction technique in pain relief during venipuncture in a blood-drawing centre.
Needle procedures are the most common and important source of pain and distress in children in the health care setting. Children with intellectual disability from any cause experience pain more frequently than healthy children. They often require venipuncture or IV cannulation for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. Pain in this population is often unrecognised because these patients are frequently unable to self-report their pain. Now it's possible to measure pain in children with intellectual disability with specific pain scales, like NCCPC-PV (Non-Communicating Children's Pain Checklist, Post-operative Version). The efficacy of a device combining vibration and cold for pain relief during venipuncture or IV cannulation has been recently reported in children. The device's actions are based on the Gate Control Theory, whereby cold and vibrations stimulate large fiber and inhibitory neurons to interrupt nociception. This non-pharmacologic technique for pain relief could be useful in this kind of patients in emergency department. To date, there is no study that validated Buzzy device for pain relief in children with intellectual disability. The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of Buzzy® (a device that provides cold and vibration), in reducing the pain during venipuncture or IV cannulation, in children with intellectual disability.
Preterm infants undergo very frequent painful procedures during neonatal care particularly during the first few days. The support for the pain of the preterm is a priority for nurses and neonatologists. Previous studies showed that non-nutritive sucking combined with sucrose ensures effective pain-relief for preterm (28-32 weeks GA). Unfortunately, the use of sucrose is limited to 4 administrations per day which is insufficient compared to the average of daily painful procedures. So, validation of an effective non-pharmacological intervention to relieve or avoid pain is essential. Facilitated tucking alone has been validated for preterm less than 37 GA during heel stick procedure with the PIPP score but no study looks for the benefit for pain relief of the association of non-nutritive sucking and facilitated tucking during heel stick procedure.
The objective of this study is to assess the utility of benzocaine spray versus a placebo spray in alleviating pain during and after hysterosalpingogram (HSG).
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in success outcome of the combined spinal epidural labor analgesia between air versus saline when used to identify the epidural space.
The study is exempt from informed consent by the MetroHealth Medical Center institutional review board (IRB), because two standards of care are used and there is no increased clinical risk to the patient due to the study. The researchers randomize either fentanyl or morphine to be given to trauma patients and record how their pain scale is treated along with observing for adverse events. They are looking to see if the hypothesized benefits of fentanyl (which is much more expensive than morphine) actually exist.