Clinical Impact of Different Duration Prone Postition Treatment for Patients With ARDS.

Oxygenation Clinical Trial

Official title:

Clinical Impact of Different Duration Prone Postition Treatment for Patients With ARDS.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04391387
• Other study ID #: VGHKS109-084
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 9, 2020
• Est. completion date: July 31, 2023

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening disease, patients with ARDS usually need mechanical ventilation. The treatment of ARDS include low tidal volume ventilation, steroid, extracorporeal membraneous oxygenator, inhaled nitric oxide or prone position . Some studies showed prone position had beneficial effect of oxygenation and mortality for severe ARDS patients, the duration of prone position should be at least 10 hours. It is unknown the optimal duration of prone position which is better for severe ARDS patients. This study will compare the clinical differences of 16-hour and 24-hour prone position for severe ARDS patients.

Description:

This is a prospective randomized controlled study. All severe ARDS patients were eligible for screening from January 2020 to December 2022. Inclusion criteria include: Patient above 20 year-old with diagnosis of severe ARDS under protective lung ventilation( tidal volume 4-8 ml/kg, plateau pressure < 30cm H2O、PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg、PEEP ≥ 5 cmH2O、FiO2 > 60%）. Patients were excluded if patients were not intubated and mechanically ventilated or contraindication for prone position ventilation (intracranial hemorrhage, massive hemoptysis, unstable hemodynamic status, recent pacemaker implantation, severe facial laceration, open abdominal wound, spine, femur or pelvis fracture or pregnancy). Patients will divide into 2 groups, one is patients supported by 16-hour prone position; another group is patients with 24-hour prone position, each group enrolled 30 patients. The medical records of these patients were analyzed for age, gender, body weight, diagnosis, pulmonary or extrapulmonary ARDS, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱscore, days between ARDS to prone position, ICU day, hospital day, ventilator day, pre and post prone position vital signs, laboratory data including arterial blood gas, lactate, respiratory parameters included PaO2/FiO2, peak inspiratory pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, ventilator mode, steroid treatment, complications (tube dislodge, pressure sore, infection), and mortality outcomes. The primary endpoint is the difference of oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2), the secondary endpoint are other respiratory parameters, vital signs, ICU day, hospital day, ventilator day, complications and survival.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 45
• Est. completion date: July 31, 2023
• Est. primary completion date: July 31, 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 20 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patient above 20 year-old with diagnosis of severe ARDS under protective lung ventilation (tidal volume 4-8 ml/kg, plateau pressure < 30cm H2O?PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg?PEEP = 5 cmH2O?FiO2 > 60%).

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients were not intubated and mechanically ventilated or contraindication for prone position ventilation (intracranial hemorrhage, massive hemoptysis, unstable hemodynamic status, recent pacemaker implantation, severe facial laceration, open abdominal wound, spine, femur or pelvis fracture or pregnancy).

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Driving Pressure
• Oxygenation

Intervention

Procedure:
• prone position
a position with the patient lying face down with arms bent comfortably at the elbow and padded with the armboards positioned forward

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Taiwan	Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital	Kaohsiung

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Taiwan, 

References & Publications (11)

Alessandri F, Pugliese F, Ranieri VM. The Role of Rescue Therapies in the Treatment of Severe ARDS. Respir Care. 2018 Jan;63(1):92-101. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05752. Epub 2017 Oct 24. — View Citation

Beitler JR, Shaefi S, Montesi SB, Devlin A, Loring SH, Talmor D, Malhotra A. Prone positioning reduces mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome in the low tidal volume era: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar;40(3):332-41. doi: 10.1007 — View Citation

Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Larsson A, McAuley DF, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld G, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A; LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, — View Citation

Drahnak DM, Custer N. Prone Positioning of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit Care Nurse. 2015 Dec;35(6):29-37. doi: 10.4037/ccn2015753. — View Citation

Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):698-710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907. — View Citation

Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, Hodgson CL, Munshi L, Walkey AJ, Adhikari NKJ, Amato MBP, Branson R, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Gajic O, Gattinoni L, Hess D, Mancebo J, Meade MO, McAuley DF, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Rubin E, Seckel M, Slutsky AS — View Citation

Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girar — View Citation

Lee JM, Bae W, Lee YJ, Cho YJ. The efficacy and safety of prone positional ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated study-level meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1252-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.00 — View Citation

Scholten EL, Beitler JR, Prisk GK, Malhotra A. Treatment of ARDS With Prone Positioning. Chest. 2017 Jan;151(1):215-224. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.06.032. Epub 2016 Jul 8. — View Citation

Sweeney RM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2416-2430. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00578-X. Epub 2016 Apr 28. Erratum In: Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2354. — View Citation

Tonelli AR, Zein J, Adams J, Ioannidis JP. Effects of interventions on survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome: an umbrella review of 159 published randomized trials and 29 meta-analyses. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jun;40(6):769-87. doi: 10.1007/s00 — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	oxygenation	PaO2/FiO2	Change from baseline PaO2/FiO2 at 24-hour after prone position
Secondary	respiratory parameters	driving pressure	Change from baseline driving pressure at 24-hour after prone position
Secondary	vital sign	blood pressure	Change from baseline driving pressure at 24-hour after prone position
Secondary	duration of stay	length of ICU stay	up to 3 months
Secondary	complication	sliding out of tube	up to 3 months
Secondary	survival	survival or death	one year

External Links

•   Valera, S. (2017). Mobilizing the ECMO patients: Prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane Oxygenation (vv ECMO). In C. Mossadegh & A. Combes (Eds.), Nursing care and ECMO (pp. 75-82). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.