View clinical trials related to Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Filter by:The cause of cardiac arrest mostly determines outcomes of cardiac arrest survivors. Identifying and treating the cause of cardiac arrest constitute a critical part in post-arrest care. However, the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest often encompasses multiple organ systems. Thus, forming accurate diagnosis for each case presents a daunting challenge, especially for unexperienced physicians. This study aims to evaluate whether a standardized protocol would improve the diagnostic proficiency for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Sixteen Emergency Medicine Residents from National Taiwan University Hospital participated in this study. The cause classification of OHCA (CCCA) protocol was developed by an expert cardiac arrest committee, and a lecture concerning the Utstein's template, the epidemiology of cardiac arrest and the CCCA protocol was addressed. Pre-/post-lecture questionnaires regarding self-assessed diagnostic certainty and knowledge of cardiac arrest were obtained and compared to evaluate participants' learning effectiveness. To validate the efficiency of protocol, medical records of 586 non-traumatic OHCA adults with successful resuscitation and ICU admission were reviewed retrospectively, and the OHCA cause of each patient was identified by the trained residents following CCCA protocol. The primary outcome was the diagnostic consistency between protocolized diagnosis, expert diagnosis and the discharge diagnosis
Cardiogenic shock is associated with a high mortality. The microbiome is a double-edged sword which can convey protective and detrimental cardiovascular effects. The significance of the enteral micobiome on cardiovascular mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock is still not known. This study aims to provide a deeper understanding of the role of the enteral microbiome and microbiome dependent metabolites in mortality and disease progression of patients with cardiogenic shock.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health problem, with around 40,000 victims each year in France. Their survival rate remains dramatically low, at less than 10%. In the event of pre-hospital cardiac arrest, rescuers perform resuscitation techniques using equipment for which they have been trained. They perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by alternating 30 chest compressions with 2 insufflations (30/2) with a manual insufflator bag. In basic life supports, insufflations should result in chest rise, but guidelines do not specify a precise volume. Recently, medical devices have been developed that enable precise measurement of ventilatory volumes. In simulation, these devices show hyperventilation in volume and frequency in mannequins. But no clinical study has analyzed insufflator bag ventilation maneuvers in real-life situations on pre-hospital cardiac arrest patients. The aim of this study is to analyze ventilation parameters in current practice in relation to standards, and the factors influencing the quality of ventilation maneuvers.
The First responder Airway & Compression rate Trial (FACT) Study will address basic life support (BLS) treatments administered by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) first responders to patients who suffer a sudden circulatory (pulseless) collapse, referred to as sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (SCA). The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial among persons who suffer SCA to compare these two rescue breathing approaches (standard Bag Valve Mask vs i-gel) along with evaluating a more precise chest compression rate within the range of 100-120 compressions per minute during CPR. Importantly, each of these treatments fall within established resuscitation guidelines and are already administered as part of standard care in clinical practice. Thus this proposed trial will essentially be comparing one standard-of-care treatment against another standard-of-care treatment. The study will address two primary aims: Aim 1: To compare survival to hospital discharge between SCA patients randomized to BVM versus the i-gel for rescue breathing. The hypothesis is that treatment with i-gel will result in a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge than BVM. Aim 2: To compare survival to hospital discharge between SCA patients randomized to chest compression rates of 100 versus 110 versus 120 per minute. The hypothesis is that treatment with 100 chest compressions per minute will result in a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge than compression rates of 110 or 120 per minute.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has multiple etiologies. In the absence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is delayed. This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Coronary Calcium Score (CCS) and Coronary CT Angiogram (CCTA) to rule out a coronary artery disease (CAD) in the first days after an OHCA.
Purpose: This study aims to find out if the current way of performing chest compressions during resuscitation for patients who have suffered a cardiac arrest outside of the hospital is affecting their chances of recovery. Recent research suggests that more than half of these patients receive chest compressions near their aortic valve, which might block blood flow and make their condition worse. We will use a special imaging technique called transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during resuscitation to see if compressions near the aortic valve impact patient outcomes. Methods: We will conduct a study with patients who have suffered a cardiac arrest outside of the hospital and are receiving TEE during resuscitation in the emergency department. Some patients will not be included in the study, such as those who recover quickly before the TEE is done, those who need other treatments before they recover, those with an unclear compression site, or those with poor or missing TEE images. We will divide the patients into two groups: those with compressions near their aortic valve and those without. We will collect information on the patients, the TEE recordings, the resuscitation process, and important time points. We will mainly look at whether the patients recover and maintain a steady heartbeat. We will also examine other factors like their carbon dioxide levels, whether they recover at all, if they survive to be admitted to the hospital, if they survive to be discharged, and if they have good brain function when they leave the hospital. We plan to have 37 patients in each group for accurate results.
An out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a sudden event where the heart stops beating and a person becomes unresponsive. During this event, vital organs in the body receive no blood flow, causing them to shut down. Without intervention to restart the heart, a person effectively dies. In the UK, around 60,000 people experience cardiac arrests each year, with most occurring at home. Despite prompt emergency service response, survival rates are typically low. There is technology available that has the potential to improve survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The intervention involves three devices used together: head-up position CPR (Elegard), active compression-decompression mechanical CPR (Lucas-3), and the Impedance Threshold device (Resqpod-16). When combined, these devices can enhance blood flow during resuscitation, potentially leading to improved initial resuscitation rates and higher rates of survival with normal brain function after a cardiac arrest. A pilot study is planned to test the feasibility of using these devices. The results will inform the design of a larger study to determine if this technology can indeed improve survival rates in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
Specific Aim : The specific aim is to conduct a randomized prospective clinical trial to determine whether no antibiotics in OHCA patients in the ED with very low likelihood of infection is non-inferior to early antibiotic treatment. Hypothesis a: 28-day all-cause mortality will be non-inferior in OHCA patients with very low likelihood of infection who do not receive antibiotic therapy compared with those who receive early antibiotic therapy Hypothesis b: There will be no difference in subsequent incidence of proven infections in the no antibiotics vs, early antibiotics groups Hypothesis c: There will be no difference in the length of ICU stay and overall hospital stay in the early antibiotics vs. no antibiotics groups
This study aims to report mortality and neurological outcome 180 days after drowning incident in patients with accidental hypothermia vs normothermia following drowning-related OHCA in Denmark during a six-year period from 2016-2021.
The goal of this prospective trial is to compare CPR skill and attitudes in adolescent students. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: - Does a gamified CPR experience improve CPR skill retention compared to standard classroom CPR training? - Does a gamified CPR experience improve attitudes/knowledge relating to barriers for women and minorities receiving CPR? Participants will - Answer pre-training questionnaires - Participate in CPR training - Participate in CPR skills testing on the day of training, and at 4-6 months - Answer post-training questionnaires Researchers will compare standard CPR classroom training to the novel gamified CPR training experience, which includes an interactive film, a CPR Trainer spring, and a mobile device app.