Osteochondritis Dissecans Knee Clinical Trial
— MAIOCDOfficial title:
Triphasic Osteochondral Scaffold for the Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Observational Study
NCT number | NCT05332288 |
Other study ID # | MAIOCD |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | April 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date | April 2029 |
The objective of the present study is to evaluate the clinical results of reconstructive treatment of knee OCD defects treated with osteochondral scaffolds implanted with specific instrumentation.The evaluation will be performed through clinical, subjective and objective assessments.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | April 2029 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 15 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria - Male or female patients, aged 15-40 years; - Single symptomatic osteochondral injury from OCD classified as ICRS OCD III or IV at the level of the femoral condyles; - Failure of conservative treatment - Lesion size between 1 and 10 cm2; - BMI = 30; - Ability and consent of patients to actively participate in the rehabilitation protocol and clinical and radiological follow-up. Exclusion Criteria: - -Additional grade III or IV cartilage injury on the knee being treated; - Advanced osteoarthritis - Systemic or localized infection - Systemic (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) or local (e.g. synovitis) inflammatory diseases and cardiovascular diseases - Immune system disorders - Degenerative or vascular bone pathology (e.g. osteonecrosis) - Coagulation disorders - Systemic conditions that alter wound healing - Established allergy to equine collagen and calcium phosphate salts - Presence of ligamentous/patellofemoral instability/malignment, varus or valgus malalignment = 3° that cannot be treated/corrected simultaneously; - Previous tendon repair, ligamentous reconstruction, or realignment procedures within the past 12 months; - Presence of any known human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis, syphilis, malignant neoplasms and ongoing anti-neoplastic chemotherapy and radiation treatment; Uncontrolled diabetes; Uncontrolled thyroid function changes; Uncontrolled metabolic disorders; Renal disease and hypercalcemia - Uncooperative patients, including those with a history of alcohol and drug abuse; Participation in another clinical trial or medical device trial that clinically interferes with the present pilot study; - Incapacitated patients; - Pregnant or lactating women. In particular, in the case of a suspected pregnancy in a patient of childbearing age, this will be excluded by serological testing (hCG). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Italy | Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli | Bologna |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli |
Italy,
Andriolo L, Candrian C, Papio T, Cavicchioli A, Perdisa F, Filardo G. Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee - Conservative Treatment Strategies: A Systematic Review. Cartilage. 2019 Jul;10(3):267-277. doi: 10.1177/1947603518758435. Epub 2018 Feb 22. — View Citation
Andriolo L, Crawford DC, Reale D, Zaffagnini S, Candrian C, Cavicchioli A, Filardo G. Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: Etiology and Pathogenetic Mechanisms. A Systematic Review. Cartilage. 2020 Jul;11(3):273-290. doi: 10.1177/1947603518786557. Epub 2018 Jul 12. — View Citation
Andriolo L, Di Martino A, Altamura SA, Boffa A, Poggi A, Busacca M, Zaffagnini S, Filardo G. Matrix-assisted chondrocyte transplantation with bone grafting for knee osteochondritis dissecans: stable results at 12 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jun;29(6):1830-1840. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06230-y. Epub 2020 Aug 18. — View Citation
Boffa A, Solaro L, Poggi A, Andriolo L, Reale D, Di Martino A. Multi-layer cell-free scaffolds for osteochondral defects of the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical evidence. J Exp Orthop. 2021 Jul 30;8(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00377-4. — View Citation
Di Martino A, Perdisa F, Filardo G, Busacca M, Kon E, Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S. Cell-Free Biomimetic Osteochondral Scaffold for the Treatment of Knee Lesions: Clinical and Imaging Results at 10-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Aug;49(10):2645-2650. doi: 10.1177/03635465211029292. Epub 2021 Jul 20. — View Citation
Filardo G, Andriolo L, Soler F, Berruto M, Ferrua P, Verdonk P, Rongieras F, Crawford DC. Treatment of unstable knee osteochondritis dissecans in the young adult: results and limitations of surgical strategies-The advantages of allografts to address an osteochondral challenge. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1726-1738. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5316-5. Epub 2018 Dec 6. — View Citation
Kon E, Filardo G, Brittberg M, Busacca M, Condello V, Engebretsen L, Marlovits S, Niemeyer P, Platzer P, Posthumus M, Verdonk P, Verdonk R, Victor J, van der Merwe W, Widuchowski W, Zorzi C, Marcacci M. A multilayer biomaterial for osteochondral regeneration shows superiority vs microfractures for the treatment of osteochondral lesions in a multicentre randomized trial at 2 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Sep;26(9):2704-2715. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4707-3. Epub 2017 Sep 14. — View Citation
Minas T, Ogura T, Headrick J, Bryant T. Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation "Sandwich" Technique Compared With Autologous Bone Grafting for Deep Osteochondral Lesions in the Knee. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):322-332. doi: 10.1177/0363546517738000. Epub 2017 Nov 10. — View Citation
Sessa A, Perdisa F, Di Martino A, Zaffagnini S, Filardo G. Cell-Free Biomimetic Osteochondral Scaffold: Implantation Technique. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019 Aug 14;9(3):e27. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.18.00089. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | IKDC-Subjective Score | This is a subjective, knee-specific rating scale that is considered one of the most reliable assessment tools in the evaluation of knee pathologies. All questions examines 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function | 24 months | |
Secondary | IKDC-Subjective Score | This is a subjective, knee-specific rating scale that is considered one of the most reliable assessment tools in the evaluation of knee pathologies. All questions examines 3 categories: symptoms, sports activity, and knee function | baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 60 months | |
Secondary | IKDC-Objective Score | The objective rating scale has seven parameters related to knee function. The presence of effusions and degree of knee motion are assessed; the worst value of any of these parameters determines the final IKDC grade. There are four grades (A, B, C, D) that identify a knee rated as normal, near normal, abnormal, and severely abnormal, respectively; | baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 60 months | |
Secondary | KOOS Score | KOOS SCORE consists of 5 subscales and covers: pain (9 items), symptoms (7 items, two of which are related to stiffness), functions and activities of daily living (17 items), physical function, sports and leisure activities (5 items) and quality of life in relation to the knee (4 items). | baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 60 months | |
Secondary | TegnerActivity Level Scale | Tegner activity level scale allows to know the level of physical activity carried out by the patients. Tegner's activity scale classifies the activity according to work and sports activities on a scale from 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents soccer a national or international level | baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 60 months | |
Secondary | EQ-5D (EuroQoL) Current Health Assessment | The EQ-5D profile, asks patients to classify their health based on self-assessed levels of problems ("no", "some", "extreme") on five dimensions. | baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 60 months | |
Secondary | Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS | A tool to assess patient satisfaction in consideration of their current degree of pain, function, and daily activity. Patients can express if their state of health will be satisfying, answering "yes" or "no" | baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 60 months | |
Secondary | Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score | The MOCART score 2.0 is a data point of interest because it allows for the assessment of both the repair of the specific cartilage tissue and the structures surrounding it. The MOCART score 2.0 is based on nine variables measured on a standard MRI and summed to a score, ranging from 0 to 100, where 100 represents the best score and a score of 0 represents the worst score. The underlying factors that may influence the MOCART 2.0 score are the severity of the defect prior to cartilage repair surgery; | 12 months, 24 months, 60 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04649905 -
Psychological Response and Readiness Associated With OCD of the Knee
|