View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Shoulder.
Filter by:Prospective Multi-Center Registry on study subjects with implanted devices marketed and legally commercialized in the USA by FX Shoulder Solutions.
Subjects implanted with the shoulder replacement medical devices manufactured by FX Shoulder Solutions and distributed by FX Shoulder Solutions.
The goal of the Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study is to collect safety and performance data on the commercially available Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid device. The study will learn about standard device use in adult patients who have a functional deltoid muscle and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear. The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the average improvement in patient-reported shoulder function after 2 years when compared to before the surgery, and - What is the rate of surgical revisions needed over a 10 year period Patients will be asked to will be asked to regularly attend their check-up visits with their surgeon (including having x-rays or CT images taken to check their shoulder and implant), to complete questionnaires to report how their shoulder is doing, and to tell their surgeon when they notice any changes.
Rationale: Although most patients experience significant pain relief after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), pain persists for some patients even after surgery. The endogenous pain system may be involved in persisting postoperative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients, but this has never been studies for TSA patients. Furthermore, psychological factors and coping strategies may also be of interest but have not yet been extensively studied in TSA patients. Objective: The primary objective is to explore whether central sensitization and/or abnormal CPM responses are present in (a subgroup of) patients who will receive shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, and whether shoulder arthroplasty produces change in these measures of the endogenous pain modulatory system. The secondary objective, in case patients with altered endogenous pain modulation are found, is to explore if change in pain over time, psychological factors and coping strategies differ between patients with and without altered pain modulation. Study design: An exploratory prospective observational cohort study. Study population: Patients (age 18 years or older) who are scheduled to undergo shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, at the Reinier Haga Orthopaedic Centre. Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameters are CPM and TS values at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after surgery, as well as the absence/presence of allodynia at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The burden of participation will consist of completing questionnaires at baseline and at three and six months after surgery. In addition, subjects will undergo psychophysical testing at 3 moments, which can lead to redness or a burning sensation of the skin during the first 24 hours after testing. The investigators do not expect any additional risks associated with participation. There is no direct benefit for the subjects.
The objective of this study is to collect and evaluate long-term clinical outcomes data in order to better understand the safety and performance of the Equinoxe Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis in shoulder arthroplasty over time. This study will follow subjects for a period of up to 10 years post-surgery.
This study will compare total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with an augmented glenoid component and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures, in participants with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis aged 65 years and older, who also present with greater than 15 degrees of glenoid retroversion, in the context of a prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal treatment in this patient population.
This is a multicenter, retrospective and prospective, non-controlled post market surveillance study. The objectives of this study are to confirm safety, performance and clinical benefits of the T.E.S.S.® Version 3 Anatomic and Reverse Modular Total shoulder prosthesis and its instrumentation.
Evaluation of the performance and safety of the Catalyst CSR Shoulder System with clinical and radiographic results at multiple time points through 24 months postoperatively This study will be a prospective multi-center study conducted in the United States.
This is a non-surgical trial comparing the clinical and functional outcomes of patients with osteoarthritis treated with Intra-articular injection of Micro Fragmented Adipose Tissue versus conventional therapy of intra-articular injection of corticosteroid.
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder is a disease resulting from the wearing down of cartilage over time. OA can produce pain and dysfunction at the affected joint and is a growing occurrence in an aging population. Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a surgical treatment used to treat patients with shoulder OA which involves replacing the worn-out ball and socket shoulder joint with prosthetic components. TSA is performed today with high success rates, however, complication rates associated with TSA remain prevalent particularly when the arthritis is associated with bone erosion on the glenoid (socket). Given the high rate of revisions associated with TSA treatment in the setting of glenoid bone erosion, a number of surgical strategies have been developed. These surgical techniques include eccentric reaming which involves removing bone from the front of the socket, augmented glenoid component implantation, and posterior bone grafting to compensate for glenoid bone loss, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Few research studies have compared these different surgical techniques to one another. Previous studies have been limited to case series with small sample sizes and respective designs. This study is being conducted to determine which approach produces better outcomes. For the purpose of this study we will be comparing total shoulder arthroplasty techniques a) augmented glenoid component and eccentric reaming and b) augmented glenoid component and bone grafting in participants with advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis.