Orthognathic Surgery Clinical Trial
Official title:
Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for the Recovery of Oral Function After Orthognathic Surgery
Verified date | May 2022 |
Source | Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Oral functions of patients are markedly diminished immediately after orthognathic surgery, and novel approaches are needed to accelerate their recovery. The aim of this study is to examine the usefulness of weekly applications of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for this purpose, based on evidence of its effectiveness in other types of patients with muscle alterations. The main objective is to determine whether weekly TENS applications can increase the bite force and jaw opening in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery and decrease their pain and inflammation
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 47 |
Est. completion date | January 15, 2020 |
Est. primary completion date | May 18, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 22 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - programing of bimaxillary or mandibular orthognathic surgery - no previous or concomitant surgery for temporo-mandibular disorders - no presence of complex syndromes - no presence of muscle or nervous disorders or receipt of medication for such disorders Exclusion Criteria: - impossibility to attend follow-up appointments - refusal of informed consent |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Faculty of Odontology, University Complutense | Madrid |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
Spain,
Bell WH, Gonyea W, Finn RA, Storum KA, Johnston C, Throckmorton GS. Muscular rehabilitation after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983 Sep;56(3):229-35. — View Citation
Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CGT, Liebano RE, Amrit AS, Bush HM, Lee KS, Lee JE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain, fatigue and hyperalgesia while restoring central inhibition in primary fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2554-2562. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.043. Epub 2013 Jul 27. — View Citation
Dowswell T, Bedwell C, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD007214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007214.pub2. Review. — View Citation
Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R. How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 27. Review. — View Citation
Hidaka O, Iwasaki M, Saito M, Morimoto T. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure. J Dent Res. 1999 Jul;78(7):1336-44. — View Citation
Iwase M, Ohashi M, Tachibana H, Toyoshima T, Nagumo M. Bite force, occlusal contact area and masticatory efficiency before and after orthognathic surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Dec;35(12):1102-7. Epub 2006 Nov 9. — View Citation
Jung HD, Jung YS, Park JH, Park HS. Recovery pattern of mandibular movement by active physical therapy after bilateral transoral vertical ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jul;70(7):e431-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.02.033. — View Citation
Liebano RE, Rakel B, Vance CGT, Walsh DM, Sluka KA. An investigation of the development of analgesic tolerance to TENS in humans. Pain. 2011 Feb;152(2):335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.10.040. Epub 2010 Dec 8. — View Citation
Matsui Y, Ohno K, Michi K, Suzuki Y, Yamagata K. A computerized method for evaluating balance of occlusal load. J Oral Rehabil. 1996 Aug;23(8):530-5. — View Citation
Mendell LM. Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain. 2014 Feb;155(2):210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 12. Review. — View Citation
Moran F, Leonard T, Hawthorne S, Hughes CM, McCrum-Gardner E, Johnson MI, Rakel BA, Sluka KA, Walsh DM. Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity. J Pain. 2011 Aug;12(8):929-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.02.352. Epub 2011 Apr 9. — View Citation
Nagai I, Tanaka N, Noguchi M, Suda Y, Sonoda T, Kohama G. Changes in occlusal state of patients with mandibular prognathism after orthognathic surgery: a pilot study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Dec;39(6):429-33. — View Citation
Oh DW, Kim KS, Lee GW. The effect of physiotherapy on post-temporomandibular joint surgery patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2002 May;29(5):441-6. — View Citation
Ohkura K, Harada K, Morishima S, Enomoto S. Changes in bite force and occlusal contact area after orthognathic surgery for correction of mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Feb;91(2):141-5. — View Citation
Oliveira Sierra S, Melo Deana A, Mesquita Ferrari RA, Maia Albarello P, Bussadori SK, Santos Fernandes KP. Effect of low-level laser therapy on the post-surgical inflammatory process after third molar removal: study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Nov 6;14:373. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-373. — View Citation
Sato KL, Sanada LS, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Increasing intensity of TENS prevents analgesic tolerance in rats. J Pain. 2012 Sep;13(9):884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Aug 1. — View Citation
Teng TT, Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR. The Effect of early physiotherapy on the recovery of mandibular function after orthognathic surgery for Class III correction: part I--jaw-motion analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan;43(1):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.025. Epub 2014 Nov 1. — View Citation
Throckmorton GS, Ellis E 3rd, Buschang PH. Morphologic and biomechanical correlates with maximum bite forces in orthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 May;58(5):515-24. — View Citation
Tong KC, Lo SK, Cheing GL. Alternating frequencies of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: does it produce greater analgesic effects on mechanical and thermal pain thresholds? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Oct;88(10):1344-9. — View Citation
Trawitzki LV, Silva JB, Regalo SC, Mello-Filho FV. Effect of class II and class III dentofacial deformities under orthodontic treatment on maximal isometric bite force. Arch Oral Biol. 2011 Oct;56(10):972-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Mar 25. — View Citation
Ueki K, Marukawa K, Hashiba Y, Nakagawa K, Degerliyurt K, Yamamoto E. Assessment of the relationship between the recovery of maximum mandibular opening and the maxillomandibular fixation period after orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Mar;66(3):486-91. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.044. — View Citation
Wen-Ching Ko E, Huang CS, Lo LJ, Chen YR. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;70(2):e158-68. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.10.002. — View Citation
Yaedú RYF, Mello MAB, Tucunduva RA, da Silveira JSZ, Takahashi MPMS, Valente ACB. Postoperative Orthognathic Surgery Edema Assessment With and Without Manual Lymphatic Drainage. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Oct;28(7):1816-1820. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003850. — View Citation
* Note: There are 23 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Bite force | Bite force will be measured using Dental Prescale Fuji® film placed between the occlusal surfaces of the two arches, and the patient will be asked to bite as strongly as possible for 5 sec and the best-defined tooth print will be photographed with a Canon® EOS 500 camera (RAW format, F32, and annular Flash) at the minimum distance permitted by the 75-macro lens. The image will be processed in a Mac computer to obtain the color value according to the Cie L*a*b* (CIELAB) scale, which gives the color a numerical value.The corresponding pressure units (Megapascals, MPa) will be calculated according to Dental Prescale specifications, and the bite force (in Newtons [N]) will be obtained by using the following formula:
Bite Force= Bite Pressure (MPa) x mm2 print surface. |
Measurements will be taken baseline (before surgery) | |
Primary | Bite force | Bite force will be measured using Dental Prescale Fuji® film placed between the occlusal surfaces of the two arches, and the patient will be asked to bite as strongly as possible for 5 sec and the best-defined tooth print will be photographed with a Canon® EOS 500 camera (RAW format, F32, and annular Flash) at the minimum distance permitted by the 75-macro lens. The image will be processed in a Mac computer to obtain the color value according to the Cie L*a*b* (CIELAB) scale, which gives the color a numerical value.The corresponding pressure units (Megapascals, MPa) will be calculated according to Dental Prescale specifications, and the bite force (in Newtons [N]) will be obtained by using the following formula:
Bite Force= Bite Pressure (MPa) x mm2 print surface. |
Measurements will be taken at 7 days after surgery | |
Primary | Bite force | Bite force will be measured using Dental Prescale Fuji® film placed between the occlusal surfaces of the two arches, and the patient will be asked to bite as strongly as possible for 5 sec and the best-defined tooth print will be photographed with a Canon® EOS 500 camera (RAW format, F32, and annular Flash) at the minimum distance permitted by the 75-macro lens. The image will be processed in a Mac computer to obtain the color value according to the Cie L*a*b* (CIELAB) scale, which gives the color a numerical value.The corresponding pressure units (Megapascals, MPa) will be calculated according to Dental Prescale specifications, and the bite force (in Newtons [N]) will be obtained by using the following formula:
Bite Force= Bite Pressure (MPa) x mm2 print surface. |
Measurements will be taken at 14 days after surgery | |
Primary | Bite force | Bite force will be measured using Dental Prescale Fuji® film placed between the occlusal surfaces of the two arches, and the patient will be asked to bite as strongly as possible for 5 sec and the best-defined tooth print will be photographed with a Canon® EOS 500 camera (RAW format, F32, and annular Flash) at the minimum distance permitted by the 75-macro lens. The image will be processed in a Mac computer to obtain the color value according to the Cie L*a*b* (CIELAB) scale, which gives the color a numerical value.The corresponding pressure units (Megapascals, MPa) will be calculated according to Dental Prescale specifications, and the bite force (in Newtons [N]) will be obtained by using the following formula:
Bite Force= Bite Pressure (MPa) x mm2 print surface. |
Measurements will be taken at 21 days after surgery | |
Primary | Bite force | Bite force will be measured using Dental Prescale Fuji® film placed between the occlusal surfaces of the two arches, and the patient will be asked to bite as strongly as possible for 5 sec and the best-defined tooth print will be photographed with a Canon® EOS 500 camera (RAW format, F32, and annular Flash) at the minimum distance permitted by the 75-macro lens. The image will be processed in a Mac computer to obtain the color value according to the Cie L*a*b* (CIELAB) scale, which gives the color a numerical value.The corresponding pressure units (Megapascals, MPa) will be calculated according to Dental Prescale specifications, and the bite force (in Newtons [N]) will be obtained by using the following formula:
Bite Force= Bite Pressure (MPa) x mm2 print surface. |
Measurements will be taken at 28 days after surgery | |
Primary | Jaw opening | Jaw opening will be evaluated with patients seated vertically upright in the dental chair, using a digital dental caliber (Model R 100110, Mestra®) to measure the maximum opening from the incisal margin of upper central incisors to the incisal margin of lower incisors, adding the amount (in mm) of overbite or subtracting the amount (in mm) of open bite in occlusion. | Measurements will be taken baseline (before surgery) | |
Primary | Jaw opening | Jaw opening will be evaluated with patients seated vertically upright in the dental chair, using a digital dental caliber (Model R 100110, Mestra®) to measure the maximum opening from the incisal margin of upper central incisors to the incisal margin of lower incisors, adding the amount (in mm) of overbite or subtracting the amount (in mm) of open bite in occlusion. | Measurements will be taken at 7 days after surgery | |
Primary | Jaw opening | Jaw opening will be evaluated with patients seated vertically upright in the dental chair, using a digital dental caliber (Model R 100110, Mestra®) to measure the maximum opening from the incisal margin of upper central incisors to the incisal margin of lower incisors, adding the amount (in mm) of overbite or subtracting the amount (in mm) of open bite in occlusion. | Measurements will be taken at 14 days after surgery | |
Primary | Jaw opening | Jaw opening will be evaluated with patients seated vertically upright in the dental chair, using a digital dental caliber (Model R 100110, Mestra®) to measure the maximum opening from the incisal margin of upper central incisors to the incisal margin of lower incisors, adding the amount (in mm) of overbite or subtracting the amount (in mm) of open bite in occlusion. | Measurements will be taken at 21 days after surgery | |
Primary | Jaw opening | Jaw opening will be evaluated with patients seated vertically upright in the dental chair, using a digital dental caliber (Model R 100110, Mestra®) to measure the maximum opening from the incisal margin of upper central incisors to the incisal margin of lower incisors, adding the amount (in mm) of overbite or subtracting the amount (in mm) of open bite in occlusion. | Measurements will be taken at 28 days after surgery | |
Primary | Pain (VAS) | Pain perceived by patients while autonomously opening and closing their jaws will be evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (least pain value) to 10 (value of greater pain). | Measurements will be taken baseline (before surgery) | |
Primary | Pain (VAS) | Pain perceived by patients while autonomously opening and closing their jaws will be evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (least pain value) to 10 (value of greater pain). | Measurements will be taken at 7 days after surgery | |
Primary | Pain (VAS) | Pain perceived by patients while autonomously opening and closing their jaws will be evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (least pain value) to 10 (value of greater pain). | Measurements will be taken at 14 days after surgery | |
Primary | Pain (VAS) | Pain perceived by patients while autonomously opening and closing their jaws will be evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (least pain value) to 10 (value of greater pain). | Measurements will be taken at 21 days after surgery | |
Primary | Pain (VAS) | Pain perceived by patients while autonomously opening and closing their jaws will be evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (least pain value) to 10 (value of greater pain). | Measurements will be taken at 28 days after surgery | |
Primary | Inflammation | Inflammation will be measured (in mm) with patients seated upright in the dental chair, using a soft ruler to obtain a horizontal measurement from the lower border of the earlobe to the corner of the mouth and a vertical measurement from the gonial angle to the outer canthus of the eye. The soft ruler will be adapted to the contour of the patient's face without exerting any pressure. | Measurements will be taken baseline (before surgery) | |
Primary | Inflammation | Inflammation will be measured (in mm) with patients seated upright in the dental chair, using a soft ruler to obtain a horizontal measurement from the lower border of the earlobe to the corner of the mouth and a vertical measurement from the gonial angle to the outer canthus of the eye. The soft ruler will be adapted to the contour of the patient's face without exerting any pressure. | Measurements will be taken at 7 days after surgery | |
Primary | Inflammation | Inflammation will be measured (in mm) with patients seated upright in the dental chair, using a soft ruler to obtain a horizontal measurement from the lower border of the earlobe to the corner of the mouth and a vertical measurement from the gonial angle to the outer canthus of the eye. The soft ruler will be adapted to the contour of the patient's face without exerting any pressure. | Measurements will be taken at 14 days after surgery | |
Primary | Inflammation | Inflammation will be measured (in mm) with patients seated upright in the dental chair, using a soft ruler to obtain a horizontal measurement from the lower border of the earlobe to the corner of the mouth and a vertical measurement from the gonial angle to the outer canthus of the eye. The soft ruler will be adapted to the contour of the patient's face without exerting any pressure. | Measurements will be taken at 21 days after surgery | |
Primary | Inflammation | Inflammation will be measured (in mm) with patients seated upright in the dental chair, using a soft ruler to obtain a horizontal measurement from the lower border of the earlobe to the corner of the mouth and a vertical measurement from the gonial angle to the outer canthus of the eye. The soft ruler will be adapted to the contour of the patient's face without exerting any pressure. | Measurements will be taken at 28 days after surgery |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05536596 -
Pharmacological Treatment on the Recovery of Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03318757 -
Bupivacaine Liposomal Injectable Suspension, Pain and Narcotic Use After Elective Orthognathic Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03486951 -
Outpatient Orthognathic Surgery: "AMBOST" a One Year Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05009056 -
Functional Appliance for Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01989715 -
Body Posture Assessment Considering Jaws Position Before and After Orthognathic Surgery on Adult Patient.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01461031 -
Effect of Nefopam on Acute Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03986723 -
3D Printed Models in 3D Virtual Treatment Planning of Orthognathic Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT05316545 -
Retrospective Analysis of Anesthesia Procedure in Orthognathic Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT06233188 -
Effect of Customized Lateral Nasal Wall Osteotomy on the Pterygomaxillary Separation During le Fort I Down-fracture
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03843138 -
Feasibility and Performance of a Novel 3D Virtual Treatment Planning Software: an International, Multi-centric, Prospective Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06338982 -
Fracture Pattern Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy With or Without Impacted Third Molars
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06188403 -
Comparison Between Prebent Plates and Custom Plates After le Fort 1 in Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06400355 -
Effect of Mannitol on Recovery Pattern After Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06301204 -
Effectiveness Of Tranexamic Acıd Application Wıth Different Doses On Bleeding, Edema And Physician Comfort In Orthognathıc Surgery Patients
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06093893 -
Hypotensive Anesthesia for Orthognathic Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04353635 -
Prediction Accuracy of Dolphin 3D in Bimax Surgery for Class III
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03433144 -
The Effects of Tranexamic Acid on Blood Loss During Orthognathic Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT06103422 -
Change in Taste Sensation After Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT04910074 -
LLLT Effects on Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IAN) Recovery Post-orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05717322 -
TENS and Orthognathic Surgery
|
N/A |