Orthodontics Clinical Trial
Official title:
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment - A Randomized Controlled Trial About Stability and Patients' Perceptions
Verified date | August 2022 |
Source | Region Gävleborg |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate and compare stability after orthodontic treatment with an Essix retainer and a bonded cuspid-to-cuspid retainer (CTC), respectively in the mandibular arch and longitudinally follow these patients over time up to 5 years. The patients' perceptions of the two methods are also evaluated with questionnaires during the follow-up period. A further aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between diagnosis, treatment outcome, treatment time, age at start of treatment and stability with an Essix retainer in the maxilla. The null hypotheses are: - that there is no difference in retention capacity between Essix retainer and cuspid-to-cuspid retainer - that there is no difference in patients' perception between Essix retainer and cuspid-to-cuspid retainer - that there is no difference in retention capacity for Essix retainer in the maxilla concerning diagnosis before treatment, treatment outcomes, treatment time and age at start of treatment
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 104 |
Est. completion date | June 18, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | January 14, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Patients treated with fixed appliances in both the maxilla and the mandible Exclusion Criteria: - Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) for patients with severe transversal malocclusion - Treatment with segmented appliances - Patients with craniofacial anomalies and patients requiring orthognatic surgery - Patients with missing mandibular incisor |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Region Gävleborg | Umeå University |
Atack N, Harradine N, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ. Which way forward? Fixed or removable lower retainers. Angle Orthod. 2007 Nov;77(6):954-9. — View Citation
Bennett ME, Tulloch JF. Understanding orthodontic treatment satisfaction from the patients' perspective: a qualitative approach. Clin Orthod Res. 1999 May;2(2):53-61. — View Citation
Feldmann I, List T, Bondemark L. Orthodontic anchoring techniques and its influence on pain, discomfort, and jaw function--a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Feb;34(1):102-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq171. Epub 2011 Feb 7. — View Citation
Feldmann I, List T, John MT, Bondemark L. Reliability of a questionnaire assessing experiences of adolescents in orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2007 Mar;77(2):311-7. — View Citation
Hichens L, Rowland H, Williams A, Hollinghurst S, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland A, Sandy J. Cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction: Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Eur J Orthod. 2007 Aug;29(4):372-8. — View Citation
Jäderberg S, Feldmann I, Engström C. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Aug;34(4):475-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr040. Epub 2011 Apr 20. — View Citation
Kumar AG, Bansal A. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study. Aust Orthod J. 2011 May;27(1):52-6. — View Citation
Lindauer SJ, Shoff RC. Comparison of Essix and Hawley retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1998 Feb;32(2):95-7. — View Citation
Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;(1):CD002283. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub4. Review. — View Citation
Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1967 Oct;53(10):721-45. — View Citation
Renkema AM, Al-Assad S, Bronkhorst E, Weindel S, Katsaros C, Lisson JA. Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Aug;134(2):179e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.003. — View Citation
Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):730-7. — View Citation
Sheridan JJ, LeDoux W, McMinn R. Essix retainers: fabrication and supervision for permanent retention. J Clin Orthod. 1993 Jan;27(1):37-45. — View Citation
Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp061. Epub 2009 Oct 14. — View Citation
Yu Y, Sun J, Lai W, Wu T, Koshy S, Shi Z. Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 6;(9):CD008734. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008734.pub2. Review. — View Citation
* Note: There are 15 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Changes in Tooth Position | Analyses of changes in tooth position on dental casts Little's Irregularity Index (in mm) 0=no crowding/irregularity, higher scores= more crowding/irregularity (worse outcome) | Changes in tooth position (Little's Irregularity Index) were analysed 5 years (T4) after debonding (T1) | |
Secondary | Patients' Perception | Analyses of patients' perception by validated self-report questionnaires to evaluate experiences of the retention techniques VAS (visual analog scale, 0-100) 0= low satisfaction 100= high satisfaction | T4 (5 years follow up) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02918240 -
How Often Should We See Our Orthodontic Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04105491 -
Patient's Expectations, Preferences, Experiences Before, During and After the Treatment With Invisalign® Aligners
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03967002 -
Treatment of the Mandibular Dental Crowding With and Without Corticotomy Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02796911 -
Comparative Study of Different Bone Grafts in Accelerating Tooth Movement
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05650359 -
Study of the Use of Orthopulse Photobiomodulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03765151 -
The Effectiveness of Low-level Laser Therapy in Orthodontic Retention for Periodontal-compromised Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02901678 -
The Effect of Different Force Magnitudes on Maxillary Posterior Segment Intrusion
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01475773 -
Psychological Assessment of Adults Seeking Orthodontic Treatment
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05814991 -
A Cohort Prospective Study of Predictors Influencing the Quality of Visualization of the Operating Field During Orthognathic Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT03924726 -
Osseous Evidence Behind Micro-osteoperforation in Accelerating Tooth Movement.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06380790 -
Effect of Laser-aided Csf on the Rate of Leveling and Alignment of Mandibular Anterior Crowding
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00871026 -
Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) - Based Planning and Creation of Orthodontic Appliances
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05562986 -
Impacts of Oral Irrigation in Orthodontic Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06167278 -
Indirect Bonding Accuracy of 3D Printed Digital Transfer Trays
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03421886 -
Assessment of the Efficacy of the Aerodentis System
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03714087 -
Occlusal Outcomes by OGS After a Finishing Protocol
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03332082 -
A Commercial Available Tooth Positioner for the Treatment of Simple Orthodontic Relapse
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01246830 -
The Use of 2D and 3D Imaging Modalities and Its Influence on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning in Orthodontics
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00871091 -
Study Investigating Tooth Movements With Conventional and Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Supported Fixed Appliances
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06199674 -
Effects of PBM on Fixed-appliance Orthodontic Patients
|
N/A |