View clinical trials related to Organ Donation.
Filter by:The most common reason for not obtaining donation after brain death (DBD) or donation after controlled circulatory death (DCD) in France is refusal of consent by the relatives. Many observational studies suggest that consent rates may increase when the request is made by specially trained and highly experienced professionals. One technique that may maximize the consent rate is collaborative requesting made jointly by the physician in charge of the patient and an organ procurement coordinator (OPC). Although the general principles are the same for DCD as for DBD, several differences and specificities exist. First, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments (WLST) decisions should be entirely independent from organ-donation considerations, in order to eliminate potential conflicts of interest. However, separating conversations about WLST and donation may not always be possible. Potential DCD situations often occur after an extended ICU stay with the development of close ties between families and staff. The ICU physician may therefore feel that suggesting donation during the WLST conversation serves the family-ICU staff relationship. An unblinded multicenter randomized controlled trial tested the null hypothesis of no difference in organ-donation consent rates between collaborative requesting (clinical team and OPC together) vs. the clinical team only (routine requesting). The potential donors met criteria for brain-stem death or had impending brain-stem death; none were candidates for DCD. Collaborative requesting did not increase the consent rate. The PRODON study will test whether collaborative requesting by the ICU team and OPC decreases the rate of DCD refusal by families compared to routine requesting by the ICU team only.
The purpose of this study is to describe the use of methods confirming brain death in the real clinical practice of the transplant program in the Czech Republic.
Every year, thousands of Canadians receive life-saving, cost-effective organ transplants, while thousands more still wait or die because not enough organs are available. Patients with non-recoverable illnesses, who are undergoing withdrawal of life sustaining measures, can donate their organs when they die by a process called donation after circulatory determined death (DCD). However, over 30% of all DCD attempts are unsuccessful because patients do not die within the time frame required for healthy organ retrieval and prolonged exposure to low oxygen during the dying process renders organs unsuitable for transplantation. Predicting successful DCD is difficult and leads to uncertainty in the clinical community. To address this issue, the investigators have developed a clinical decision support tool called Donation Advisor (DA) that will assist the healthcare team in identifying successful DCD donors and will provide an improved assessment of the health of their organs. The investigators are ready to implement DA and evaluate its impact in 7 hospitals in Ontario. The investigators believe use of DA will reduce unsuccessful DCD attempts, enhance family experience of donation, optimize system costs, and improve transplant outcomes
Older Hispanics (age 50+ years) are disproportionately overrepresented on the transplant waitlist, but underrepresented as deceased donors and transplant recipients. This application proposes the formative research to design and empirically test an eLearning module, Promotoras de Donación, to train community health workers (i.e., Promotoras), who already provide culturally and linguistically sensitive services to their communities, to discuss and promote organ donation with older Hispanic women in 3 geographically distinct communities across the U.S. The proposed intervention leverages the established and evidence-based Promotoras program to increase rates of donor designation within Hispanic communities across the U.S. and reduce disparities in access to transplantation for this population.
Given how central Substitute Decision Makers (SDMs) are to the process leading to end of life decisions and sometimes, organ donation, it is striking how poorly understood this decision-making process is. A 2017 scoping review on the topic of soliciting SDM consent to organ donation reported on more than 168 studies covering a broad range of topics, including: SDM characteristics and predictors of consent; the process of soliciting consent; and the effect of the decision on subsequent process of care and on family well-being. An unexplored area, however, is factors - including modifiable factors - that influence SDM decision making at the end of life, which organ donation is part of, such as: responses to stress, support from extended families and friends, and personal beliefs about the ongoing medical conditions. This project seeks to fill this clear and important gap. In the ICU, at the end of life, SDMs are under incredible emotional distress, have often not eaten or slept properly for days preceding discussions about end of life and organ donation, and are also in the midst of grieving for their loved one. The time pressure poses challenges for SDMs' decision making. Thus, this study will investigate novel, potentially modifiable reasons for end of life decision so that we may better support this personally challenging and important decision, especially if organ donation decision interferes with the decision process. Primary objective: To investigate beliefs and experiences of SDMs involved in the decision-making process around withdrawal of life sustaining therapies . Secondary objective: To inform efforts to improve support for SDMs with the aim of improving the decision-making process end-of-life decisions, including when organ donation is involved.
As part of a larger study, participants are told to read 1 out of 4 anecdotes depicting an organ donation scenario where they are required to make a decision on behalf of their mother who has just suffered an accident. The participants are then surveyed on their attitudes towards organ donation.
Kidney and liver transplantation are the treatment of choice and are often the last therapeutic option offered to patients with chronic renal and liver failure. More than 70% of kidneys and liver available for transplantation are obtained from donors following neurological death. Unfortunately, compared to living donation, transplant function, graft survival, and recipient survival are consistently inferior with kidneys and liver from neurologically deceased donors. This difference lies with the exacerbated pro-inflammatory state characteristic of deceased donors. Indeed, when neurologic death occurs, the immune system releases substances in the blood that could harm organs and particularly the liver and the kidneys. We believe that achieving a better understanding of the inflammatory processes of organ donors could be greatly informative to design future randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of personalized immunosuppressive therapy on organ donors to ultimately improve the care provided to donors so as to increase the number of organs available for transplantation and enhancing the survival of received grafts
6 to 18 months after organ donation request a next of kin survey using a standardized questionnaire was conducted.
The primary goal of this study is to assess whether ventilation of deceased organ donors with an open lung protective ventilatory strategy will improve donor lung utilization rates and donor oxygenation compared to a conventional ventilatory strategy.
This study evaluates the effects of using reception staff to prompt patients by providing a pamphlet and an opportunity to register in the waiting room via a mobile tablet on deceased organ donor registration rates.