Orbital Fractures Clinical Trial
Purpose to compare the orbital fracture size measured by orbital CT scan and compare it to
the actual orbital fracture size intraoperatively in patients who needed surgical
intervention to correct the fracture.
Hypothesis: there is difference between the CT measure fracture size and the actual
intraoperative size.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 20 |
Est. completion date | August 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - With orbital fracture (trauma) proved by CT scan and need operative repair. - Agree to participate. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients that refuse to be included in the study. - Under the age of 18 years. - CT not performed or not available. - Not qualified to sign the consent form. |
Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Israel | HaEme Medical center, Dept of Ophthalmology | Afula | |
Israel | HaEmek medical center | Afula | North |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
HaEmek Medical Center, Israel |
Israel,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Patients with orbital fractures that require surgical repair will have their fracture"s" size measured intraoperatively by a ruler and/or a caliper in millimeters and compare it to the size measured by the CT scan. | Patients with orbital fractures that need to be operated. Their intraoperative fracture size will be measured by the orbital surgeon by a ruler or/and a caliper in millimeters. Size on CT scan is determined by counting the number of slides that show the fracture (for anteropsterior fracture we measure the number of coronal sections that show the fracture multiply X1-each section is 1millimeter thickness, and so on for mediolateral fractures we measure saggital sections number and for superoinferior fractures the axial sections that show the fracture. | 2 years | Yes |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03057405 -
Intra-operative (IO) Navigation and IO-CBCT for 3D Orbital Reconstruction
|
||
Terminated |
NCT03673865 -
The Use of 3D Printing in Orbital Fractures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00584506 -
Computer Aided Evaluation of Orbital Volume
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03887988 -
Orbital Fractures Registry
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04271137 -
Correction of Enophthalmos and Orbital Volume Using Pre-bent Mesh Versus 3d Printed Onlay in Orbital Fracture Cases
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02736461 -
Factors Associated With Postoperative Strabismus After Floor Fracture Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00233922 -
Reconstruction of the Orbit With a Bioresorbable Polycaprolactone Implant
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01504568 -
The Use of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Isolated Blowout Fractures
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03813732 -
Using the Transconjuctival Approach Alone Versus Using it Together With Lateral Canthotomy in Orbital Fractures
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01432964 -
Use of a Low Profile Titanium Mesh in Orbital Reconstruction
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06294535 -
The Accuracy of Reconstruction of Orbital Walls Fracture Using Prebent Mesh Versus Patient Specific Implant
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04704414 -
Exophthalmometry With 3D Face Scanners
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05439512 -
Orbital Floor Fracture Repair by Titanium Mesh Via Transantral Approach.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06369129 -
Accuracy& Orbital Volume Using Patient Specific Titanium Implant Vs Zirconia for Orbital Floor Reconstruction
|
N/A |