Oral Mucositis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Laser Therapy Associated With Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Oral Mucositis Induced by Chemotherapy in Young Patients: Randomized Blind Clinical Trial
The aim of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic action through the diameter of the lesion, of low level laser (LLL) associated to photodynamic therapy (PDT) in oral mucositis (OM) lesions, in young patients. A randomized clinical trial blinded, split-mouth was performed. The study sample consisted of 15 cancer patients (3-16 years old) of Aldenora Bello Hospital (São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil). Random allocation by lot of treatments (PDT + LLL and LLL) to quadrants of the oral cavity was performed, and the patient was his own control. Patients were masked about therapy performed on each side of the arch. The evaluation period of both therapeutic regimens was 8 days, and the outcome assessed was the lesion size (measured in cm²). Friedman and Wilcoxon tests were applied and the effect magnitude calculated. The significance level was 5%. Statistically significant difference was observed between the groups for the lesion diameter of the 6th to the 8th day (greater regression of lesion size for the PDT + LLL group), which was confirmed by a difference magnitude moderated. Based on the findings, it is concluded that PDT + LLL showed greater therapeutic effect when compared to LLL in reducing the severity of OM lesions.
The blind randomized clinical trial included 18 young patients, between 3 and 16 years old,
undergoing chemotherapy or chemo/radiological the pediatric ward of Aldenora Bello Hospital
in São Luís (Maranhão, Brazil). The study was conducted from October/2014 to January/2015.
It was adopted as inclusion criteria patients between 3 and 18 years old, in the inductive
phase of chemotherapy, with oral mucositis (OM) and bilateral lesions.
A mouth split model was conducted, and the patients were their own controls. The entry of
the patients in the study occurred consecutively. To each patient, the operator/examiner
drafted an envelope containing treatments to either side, being masked patient about the
treatment of each side: PDT (photosensitized and low level laser) + low level laser; Low
level laser].
The following parameters were used for the calculation of sample size: 95% confidence level,
80% statistical power and minimal difference of 0.82 point in the lesions diameter detected
between paired samples. A "n" sample minimum of 14 was determined for each treatment. In
order to compensate for possible losses, 18 patients were treated.
The treatments (PDT and low level laser; Low level laser) were performed in a hospital bed.
Prior to treatment, the OM lesions were evaluated and a lesion on each side was chosen.
Lesions should be located at the same site on both sides. The chosen site was the lip
mucosa. Before the procedure, the patient was instructed as to brushing and not using
mouthwashes, followed by cleaning of the oral cavity with gauze and distilled water. Two
days before the laser treatment, the side of the oral cavity chosen for the experimental
treatment (PDT and low level laser) was pigmented with the photosensitizer (aqueous solution
of 0.005% methylene blue). A ball of sterile cotton was soaked in the dye solution and
placed in the center of the lesion. Photosensitizer remained in the place for 5 minutes
(pre-irradiation period). Then, to activate the dye, the lesion was irradiated with red
light (InGaAlP / phosphide and Indium, Gallium and potassium) (Flash Laser III, DMC, São
Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil), with a wavelength of 660 nm, for a period 90 seconds, with a
power of 100mW, to 1cm away, according to the manufacturer's specifications. The lesion on
the opposite side was treated with ball of sterile cotton soaked in distilled water and the
laser unit placed on the lesion without activation of the light. This procedure aimed to
mask the patient about the side that received the experimental therapy (PDT and low level
laser). This masking was possible because the experimental solution is insipid, very soluble
and thus leaves no residue.
From the 3rd to the 10th day (total of 8 days) was carried out only laser therapy on both
sides. Lesions were evaluated until the 8th day. After the 8th day of assessment, the
lesions were only treated to a complete remission as well as other lesions present in the
oral cavity. For laser therapy was first used infrared emitter laser unit with active medium
AsGaAl (Gallium Arsenide and Aluminium), with wavelength of 808nm, for analgesia. Then, the
investigators used the red emitter, whose active medium was the InGaAlP (phosphide and
Indium, Gallium and Potassium), with wavelength of 660nm to photobiomodulation. For both
units emitting laser, the tip of the device was closed against the edges of the lesion,
perpendicular to the tissue. A irradiation was continuous and the application punctual (10
seconds). The distance between the points of irradiation was about 1cm. The energy delivered
was 4J per point of application. The interval between sessions was 24 hours.
The tip of the laser was disinfected with 70% alcohol solution and wrapped with a plastic
film. Patients and operators wore glasses for eye protection.
A questionnaire containing demographic, socioeconomic and type of treatment for cancer was
applied to parents and children. White blood cell count and platelets (beginning and end of
the inductive phase of QT) were extracted from medical records.
The assessed outcome measure was the diameter of the lesion (in cm2). The areas of the
lesions were measured with a flexible ruler (record made in cm2) by the operator/examiner
from the start of treatment with exclusive laser therapy (3rd day). This procedure was
repeated on subsequent days until the 8th day of laser treatment. The measurement of the
lesions occurred prior to laser therapy applications.
The Friedman test was used for multiple comparisons within groups (different times of
treatment). Paired evaluation between each two moments was evaluated using the Wilcoxon
test, with significance corrected by Bonferroni test (p = 0.0071). The Wilcoxon test was
used to compare the diameter of the lesion, every day, between the PDT + Low level laser and
Low level laser groups (dependent samples/split-mouth). It calculated the effect magnitude
(d) of standardized differences between averages of two groups. The level of significance
for analysis was 5%.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02229136 -
Miracle Mouthwash Plus Hydrocortisone vs Prednisolone Mouth Rinse for Mouth Sores Caused by Everolimus
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03843554 -
Commensal Oral Microbiota in Head and Neck Cancer
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT02662374 -
Oral Hygiene Regimen in Patients on HCT
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00938080 -
Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of AG013 in Oral Mucositis in Subjects Receiving Induction Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Cancers of the Head and Neck
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00756951 -
Dose Ranging Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of SCV-07 for the Delay to Onset of Severe Oral Mucositis in Patients Receiving Chemoradiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00701688 -
Dose Escalation Study Of Palifermin in Pediatric Research Participants Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05059613 -
Thalidomide With or Without Probiotics in Radioactive Oral Mucositis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04440930 -
White Tea for Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Mucositis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05705622 -
The Effect of Nursing Education on Oral Mucositis in Bone Marrow Transplant Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02399228 -
A Trial of a Botanical Drug Containing East Indian Sandalwood Oil (EISO) for the Treatment of Oral Mucositis
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02589860 -
Analysis of Oral Mucositis in Patient's Undergoing Melphalan Conditioning and Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01772706 -
Laser Mucite ORL : Effectiveness of Laser Therapy for Mucositis Induced by a Radio-chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06122636 -
Efficacy of a Probiotic and Microbiological Analysis on Oral Complications Induced by Antineoplastic Therapies in Patients With HNC
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03689712 -
ROMAN: Phase 3 Trial Investigating the Effects of GC4419 on Radiation Induced Oral Mucositis in Head/Neck Cancer Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT02539342 -
Caphosol Study: Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults Receiving Chemotherapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01789658 -
Cryotherapy for Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Children Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00790322 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of SBG vs Placebo in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00549952 -
Observational Study of Anti-Cancer Therapy Induced Oral Mucositis in Korean Cancer Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00289003 -
The Protective Effect of Soluble Beta-1,3/1,6-Glucan Compared to Placebo in Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT05635929 -
Oral Mucositis and Quality of Life With a Mucosa Topical Composition in Head & Neck Cancer Patients.
|
N/A |