Open Bite Clinical Trial
Official title:
Short-term Soft and Hard Tissue Changes Following Skeletal Anterior Open Bite Treatment Using the Rapid Molar Intruder
Verified date | December 2022 |
Source | Damascus University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study evaluated the efficacy of rapid molar intruder (RMI) in treating anterior open bite in the mixed dentition. The study sample consisted of 40 patients who had a skeletal anterior open bite. The sample was allocated randomly into two groups: the RMI group and the control group. The skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes occurring after treatment were assessed by using lateral cephalometric images.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 40 |
Est. completion date | January 20, 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | April 20, 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 8 Years to 12 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients in the mixed dentition 2. Chronological age between 8 and 12 years 3. skeletal class I or II malocclusion 4. Skeletal anterior open bite was assessed clinically and then confirmed radiographically: SN/GoMe was greater than 33°, MM was greater than 27 5. No general problems 6. Good oral health Exclusion Criteria: 1. Presence of periodontal diseases 2. Presence of general diseases, syndromes or cleft lip and palate 3. Patients with previous orthodontic treatment |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Syrian Arab Republic | University of Damascus | Damascus |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Damascus University |
Syrian Arab Republic,
Cinsar A, Alagha AR, Akyalcin S. Skeletal open bite correction with rapid molar intruder appliance in growing individuals. Angle Orthod. 2007 Jul;77(4):632-9. doi: 10.2319/071406-292. — View Citation
Feres MF, Abreu LG, Insabralde NM, de Almeida MR, Flores-Mir C. Effectiveness of open bite correction when managing deleterious oral habits in growing children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2017 Feb;39(1):31-42. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw005. Epub 2016 Feb 3. — View Citation
Meibodi SE, Fatahi Meybodi S, Samadi AH. The effect of posterior bite-plane on dentoskeletal changes in skeletal open-bite malocclusion. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009 Oct-Dec;27(4):202-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.57653. — View Citation
Pisani L, Bonaccorso L, Fastuca R, Spena R, Lombardo L, Caprioglio A. Systematic review for orthodontic and orthopedic treatments for anterior open bite in the mixed dentition. Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0142-0. Epub 2016 Sep 19. — View Citation
Turkkahraman H, Cetin E. Comparison of two treatment strategies for the early treatment of an anterior skeletal open bite : Posterior bite block-vertical pull chin cup (PBB-VPC) vs. posterior bite block-high pull headgear (PBB-HPH). J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jul;78(4):338-347. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0095-z. Epub 2017 May 9. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change in the SNA angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the position of the upper jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the SNB angle. | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the position of the lower jaw in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the ANB angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the spatial relationship between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the MM angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the amount of vertical divergence between the upper and lower jaws in the cephalometric analysis. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the SN-OCP angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the relationship between the occlusion plane and the cranial base in the cephalometric analysis in the vertical direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the SN-MP angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the relationship between the lower jaw plane and the cranial base in the cephalometric analysis in the vertical direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the SN-SPP angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the relationship between the upper jaw plane and the cranial base in the cephalometric analysis in the vertical direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the overbite (Ovb) | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres vertically from the upper to the lower central incisors. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the overjet (Ovj) | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres Horizontally from the upper to the lower central incisors. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the Bjork sum (NS-Ar + S-Ar-Go +Ar-Go-Me) | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the UI- LI angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the relationship between the upper and the lower incisor axis in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the NS-GN angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the growth pattern of the mandible in the cephalometric analysis in the vertical direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the posterior facial height (S-Go) | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres vertically from S point to GO point. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the anterior facial height (N-Me) | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres vertically from N point to Me point. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the U1-Palatal plane measurement | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres vertically from the upper central incisor apex and the palatal plane. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the U6-Palatal plane measurement | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres vertically from the tip of the mesial cusp of the upper first molar and the palatal plane. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the L1-GoMe measurement | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres vertically from the lower central incisor apex and the mandibular plane. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Primary | Change in the L6-GoMe measurement | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres vertically from the tip of the mesial cusp of the lower first molar and the mandibular plane. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Secondary | Change in the Li-Esth measurement | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres from the Labrale inferius and E-Line of Ricketts. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Secondary | Change in the Ls-Esth measurement | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient. This was measured in millimetres from the Labrale superius and E-Line of Ricketts. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Secondary | Change in the Nasolabial angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the relationship between the nose and the upper lip in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. | |
Secondary | Change in the Mentolabial angle | Lateral cephalometric images were taken for each patient, and this angle was measured in degrees. This angle represents the relationship between the chin and the lower lip in the cephalometric analysis in the anteroposterior direction. | Time 1: One week before the beginning of the treatment, Time 2: after nine months from the beginning of active treatment. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06140849 -
Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Models for Diagnosis of Anterior Open Bite Malocclusion
|
||
Completed |
NCT06233188 -
Effect of Customized Lateral Nasal Wall Osteotomy on the Pterygomaxillary Separation During le Fort I Down-fracture
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05792553 -
Effects of Tongue Tamers as an Early Treatment of Anterior Open Bite
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03702881 -
Anterior Open Bite Treatment With Bonded Spurs Associated With Build-ups Versus Conventional Bonded Spurs
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04338217 -
Early Treatment of Skeletal Anterior Open Bite by Two Appliances
|
N/A |