Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05754320 |
Other study ID # |
94/13 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 10, 2012 |
Est. completion date |
November 1, 2017 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2023 |
Source |
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Background: While the tension band wiring (TBW) technique is commonly used for simple,
displaced olecranon fractures, it is associated with complications such as hardware
prominence. To date, studies comparing between the efficacy and safety of TBW and plate
fixation for these fractures have not provided a conclusive answer.
Purposes: To investigate which of the two techniques provide better functional and
radiological outcomes for simple displaced Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures, Which technique
provides better patient-reported outcomes, What are the complication rates associated with
each technique
Description:
Background: While the tension band wiring (TBW) technique is commonly used for simple,
displaced olecranon fractures, it is associated with complications such as hardware
prominence. To date, studies comparing between the efficacy and safety of TBW and plate
fixation for these fractures have not provided a conclusive answer.
Purposes: To investigate which of the two techniques provide better functional and
radiological outcomes for simple displaced Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures, Which technique
provides better patient-reported outcomes, What are the complication rates associated with
each technique Methods: A long-term, prospective, randomized study on 50 adult patients who
underwent surgery to treat acute, simple, displaced olecranon fractures in a Hand and Upper
Extremity Surgery Unit at a tertiary care center between November 2012 and October 2017.
Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to either tension band or plate fixation and were
evaluated at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Evaluation of
long-term complications continued after 1 year as clinically indicated. The primary outcome
measure was the 1-year postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.
Additional outcome measures included patient-reported Oxford elbow score, functional (i.e.,
range of motion) and radiographic assessments and complication rates.