Old Age Clinical Trial
Official title:
Feasibility of a Physical Activity Programme Embedded Into the Daily Lives of Older Adults Living in Nursing Homes: a Randomised Controlled Pilot Feasibility Study
Older people living in nursing homes spend the majority of their time inactive. The current study has designed a physical activity intervention for older people living in nursing homes whereby the participants will incorporate more physical activity throughout their daily activities. Each participant's physical activity programme will be tailored to their physical abilities and to a pre-defined goal. The aim of this pilot feasibility study is to explore the feasibility and acceptability of this physical activity programme and to examine the preliminary effects of this on physical mobility and health-related quality of life, when compared to a usual care control group.
Physical inactivity is a global health pandemic and is one of four leading contributors to
premature mortality. Although there is evidence that physical activity improves short-term
function and is safe among older adults of long-term care, the optimum contents of a physical
activity programme or how best to implement it remain unclear. Few studies in nursing homes
have attempted to increase physical activity levels by incorporating more usual activities
into the resident's everyday routine. The proposed pilot feasibility study will implement a
person-centred physical activity programme into the participant's daily routine, based on
increasing duration and repetitions of everyday functions including walking and rising from a
chair. It incorporates key constructs of social cognitive theory and is monitored by nursing
home staff who will receive training and support.
Research questions:
This pilot feasibility study will have the following primary research questions:
1. Is the intervention feasible and acceptable to staff and participants?
- Is the time commitment required for staff to monitor the intervention and
participants to partake in the intervention feasible?
- Are there any environmental barriers to completion of the intervention?
- Is the content of the intervention acceptable to participants and staff?
- Do the participants adhere to the intervention and what adherence issues arise?
2. Are the outcome measures feasible and acceptable to participants?
- What is the required time and number of visits required to collect each outcome
from participants?
- Are the outcome measures acceptable to participants?
- What is the level of missing data within the self-reported outcome measures?
3. What is the required sample size for a definitive randomised?
- What is the baseline score and variability of the primary outcome measure among
participants?
- What is the estimated effect size and variance for the primary outcome measure?
- What are the recruitment and attrition rates for nursing homes and participants? Do
these rates differ between the intervention and control groups?
The secondary research questions of the pilot study are:
4. What are the preliminary clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the intervention
compared to the control group?
- What are the components of usual care for participants allocated to the control
group?
- What are the estimated outcomes of the intervention in comparison with the control
group and are these sustained at 12 month follow-up?
- What are the costs of the intervention in comparison to costs in the control group?
- What is the feasibility of collecting health economic data (i.e. sources used and
time taken)?
Design:
A randomised controlled pilot feasibility study, including a qualitative and economic
component will be carried out. Two randomly selected nursing homes will take part in the
study; participants (n=20) in one nursing home will receive the physical activity
intervention and participants (n=20) in the other will receive usual care. In order to avoid
contamination between intervention and control groups, randomisation will take place at
nursing home level. The pilot feasibility study will not be an exact scale model of a
definitive RCT, the difference being that outcome assessment will not be blinded as a full
analysis of outcome data is not intended. However, the recruitment, randomisation, assessment
and intervention conditions will be similar to a definitive RCT in order to answer the
feasibility research questions. Quantitative outcome data will be collected in an unblinded
manner from participants at T1 (baseline, pre-intervention), T2 (directly after completion of
the intervention at 4 months) to examine the immediate intervention outcomes and T3 (12
months following the start of the intervention) to examine if the outcomes are sustained
beyond intervention completion.
Qualitative component:
A qualitative descriptive approach will be taken for the qualitative component of the study.
Qualitative data will be collected from participants and staff of the intervention group
within 1 month following intervention completion and again with the participants at 7 months
following intervention completion. Data will be collected via audio-recorded semi structured
one-to-one interviews. The aim of the interviews with participants will be to explore the
participant's experiences of receiving the intervention, the feasibility and acceptability of
the intervention, the perceived effects of the intervention, including potential adverse
effect, and issues around maintenance of the participants' physical activity over time,
following intervention completion. The staff interviews will explore the staffs' role and
experiences of being involved in the study, including their participation in the staff
education sessions and the delivery of the physical activity programmes. Semi-structured
qualitative interviews will be conducted with small subset of participants from the control
group on two occasions. The first interviews will take place immediately following the
recruitment and consent stage of the study, in order to maximise the feasibility data
obtained for these study processes. The second interviews will take place upon completion of
the 4 month intervention with the objective being to define and describe usual care.
Economic component:
A preliminary estimate of the costs and outcomes of the intervention relative to the usual
care control will be assessed using a cost effectiveness analysis and cost utility analysis.
Resource use associated with delivery of the physical activity intervention will be measured
and costed. Resources used by participants over the course of the study will be recorded in
both groups, for example health service usage, medication usage and private expenses relating
to the intervention. Data collected from the primary outcome measure, the Timed Up and Go
test, at each time point will be used alongside resource usage to provide the basis for the
cost effectiveness analysis. For the cost utility analysis, effectiveness will be evaluated
on the basis of the Quality Adjusted Life Year which will be estimated using the EuroQol 5
Dimensions 5 Levels instrument, assessed at baseline, 4 month and 12 month follow-up.
Statistical analysis:
SPSS Statistics (24.0 for Windows, Chicago, USA) will be use to analyse quantitative data.
Demographical information in both groups will be tabulated and summarised. The effect of the
intervention on clinical outcomes will be examined using suitable numerical and graphical
summaries. The statistical analysis will serve primarily to provide an estimation of likely
effect size and variance of effect size rather than statistical significance. Qualitative
data will be analysed using NVivo (QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 11, 2015). Interviews
will be transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06085248 -
Responders to Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation in Individuals Post-Stroke and Older Adults
|
Phase 1 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04103827 -
Qoos Use Sustaining Health Among patIents hOspitalized in Geriatric mediciNe (QUSHION)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04751032 -
Chinese Nutritional Risk Screening and Intervention Registration Study in Geriatric Patients
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06382740 -
Selection Protocol for Liver Transplantation in Patients Aged Over 70 Years
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04636645 -
Effects of Lower Limb Positive Pressure on the Balance of Community-dwelling Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05950646 -
Mini-dose Dexmedetomidine-Esketamine Infusion and Perioperative Sleep Quality
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03704441 -
ED50 and ED95 of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine With Fentanyl for Transurethral Prostatectomy in Elderly Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04783103 -
Neuromodulation in the Elderly Depressed: a Brain Imaging Pilot Study
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06296719 -
The Chit-Chat Educational Intervention to Promote Advance Care Planning in the Community
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05246007 -
Nocturnal Low-dose Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Perioperative Sleep Quality
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06421246 -
Activity in Geriatric Patients and Validation of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06407726 -
Comparative Effects of Virtual Reality and Vestibular Exercises on Balance Gait in Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04321265 -
Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in COVID-19
|
||
Completed |
NCT03549585 -
End-of-Life Patient Identification Assistance in Acute GEriatric Medicine
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT03978182 -
Accelerated Deep TMS in the Elderly Depressed: A Brain Imaging Approach
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06444061 -
The Balance Recovery Confidence (Brc) Scale
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04038983 -
Risk for Short-term Adverse Events in Older Users in the Emergency Department
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03962985 -
Effects of Montreal Museum of Fine Arts Visits and Older Community Dwellers With a Precarious State
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03978650 -
Risk Factors for Falls and Fall-related Injuries Associated With Mild Neurocognitive Disorders
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06252025 -
Immersive VR Reminiscence System for Facilitating Memory Retrieval Among Nursing Home Older Adults
|
N/A |