Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02243215
Other study ID # TABLT 2 Offsite
Secondary ID REG-68-2014
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received September 16, 2014
Last updated October 19, 2015
Start date September 2014
Est. completion date July 2015

Study information

Verified date October 2015
Source Zealand University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study is a randomized study exploring the difference between off-site vs. on-site training in laparoscopic skills. The study will be performed using fifty surgical trainees from the departments of urology, surgery and gynecology. The participants will be recruited, enrolled and randomized during the introductory course in basic laparoscopic techniques held six times annually at Center of Clinical Education(CEKU).

Participants will be able to train laparoscopic skills on a Box Trainer(BT) and on a Virtual Reality Simulator(VRS). They will practice until they reach a predefined level of proficiency on seven basic modules, the procedure module; "salpingectomy" on the LapSimâ„¢ and reach the passing level of 358pts on the Training and Assessment of Basic Laparoscopic Techniques(TABLT) technical test.

The intervention group will have a portable trainer available to allow training at their convenience, be it at home or at work. The control group will only practice on-site at CEKU and at their local hospital.

Participants will be asked to keep a training log with details of time spend on training and number of training sessions. The training log will contain information on any type practice involving laparoscopy be it on a BT or a VRS at the local hospital, at home on the tablet trainer or training at CEKU. Also time spend in the operation room, assisting or performing laparoscopic surgery will be registered.

To pass the TABLT all participants will book a test session at CEKU for their final test at the end of their training. At the test sessions TABLT test scores will be established on site by the Chief Investigator and afterwards using video recordings of the test. A blinded rater will give scores based on the video recordings and this will be the decisive rating to determine whether the participant has passed the test.

To pass the VRS training an employee at CEKU will monitor a VRS practice session in which proficiency level is reached.

The enrollment of participants is expected to finish June 2015 a data analysis will be performed in July 2015.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 46
Est. completion date July 2015
Est. primary completion date July 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

- hey have performed more than 50 laparoscopic procedures.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Access to a portable trainer for laparoscopic skills
Participants will have a portable trainer available to allow training at their convenience, and will be able practice on-site at Center of Clinical Education and at their local hospital.

Locations

Country Name City State
Denmark Center for Clinical Education Copenhagen Capital Region

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Zealand University Hospital Region Capital Denmark

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

References & Publications (6)

Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004 Oct;79(10 Suppl):S70-81. Review. — View Citation

Gallagher AG, Jordan-Black JA, O'Sullivan GC. Prospective, randomized assessment of the acquisition, maintenance, and loss of laparoscopic skills. Ann Surg. 2012 Aug;256(2):387-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318251f3d2. — View Citation

Kahol K, Leyba MJ, Deka M, Deka V, Mayes S, Smith M, Ferrara JJ, Panchanathan S. Effect of fatigue on psychomotor and cognitive skills. Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.004. — View Citation

Korndorffer JR Jr, Bellows CF, Tekian A, Harris IB, Downing SM. Effective home laparoscopic simulation training: a preliminary evaluation of an improved training paradigm. Am J Surg. 2012 Jan;203(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.001. — View Citation

Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT. Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;66(4):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.07.007. — View Citation

Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Winkel P, Larsen CR, Ringsted C, Gluud C, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL. Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2013 May;257(5):839-44. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827eee6e. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Difference in number of laparoscopic surgeries in 6 month period after having passed the TABLT test and reached a defined proficiency level on seven basic tasks and the salpingectomy module on the Lap Sim(R). 6 months
Other Difference in test score on the TABLT technical test. 6 months
Other Difference in number of laparoscopic surgeries during the training period, from enrollment to having passed the TABLT test 6 months
Primary Difference in time(days) to reach a defined proficiency level(358pts) on the TABLT technical test. 6 months
Primary Trainees use of off-site training in laparoscopic surgery Qualitative focus group interviews, individual interviews and log-books 6 months
Secondary Difference in time(mins.) used on training to reach a defined proficiency level(358pts) on the TABLT technical test. 6 months
Secondary Difference in the number of training sessions used to reach a defined proficiency level(358pts) on the TABLT technical test. 6 months
Secondary Difference in time(days) to reach a defined proficiency level on seven basic tasks and the salpingectomy module on the Lap Sim(R). 6 months
Secondary Difference in time(mins.) used on training to reach a defined proficiency level on seven basic tasks and the salpingectomy module on the Lap Sim(R). 6 months
Secondary Difference in number of training sessions used to reach a defined proficiency level on seven basic tasks and the salpingectomy module on the Lap Sim(R). 6 months
Secondary Correlation between participants rating of pre-tests and a blinded rater 6 months